2015 (10) TMI 969

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the illness of mother of employee, no evidence in support of such submission were produced before the Tribunal. However, considering the delay i.e. 76 days, we are of the opinion that it would be in the interest of justice that let appeal be heard on merits. However, with imposing reasonable costs. - The orders of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and Commissioner of Central Ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... toms, City Division, Vadodara, by which, the demand of recovery of duty under the provisions of the Central Excise Act to the tune of Rs . 3 ,55,485 /- with interest was challenged. 2. We have heard Mr. U.K.Shelar , learned advocate for the appellant and Mr. R.J.Oza , learned advocate for the respondent. 3. Mr. Shelar , learned advocate for the petitioner would submit that the reasons for fi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ost may be imposed on the respondent. 5. We have heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. Perused the order impugned in the present appeal. It appears from the impugned order dated 9/4/2014 and particular observation made in para 4 of the application that though the ground was raised with regard to the illness of mother of employee, no evidence in support of such submission .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X