Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Salem Versus M/s. Mohan Engineering Works

2015 (10) TMI 1055 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Penalty under Section 77 – Revenue contends that concessional penalty should not have been granted and penalty under section 77 should have been imposed – Respondent contends that service tax liability with all the penalties imposed was discharged. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- 30-9-2015 - Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member Shri L. Paneerselvam, AC (AR) : for the Petitioner Smt. T. Mary : For the Respondent ORDER: Revenue has come in appeal with the precise submission that Commissioner (Appeals) should not have dismissed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assed order, within three months thereof Revenue has obtained order of Reviewing Authority and come in appeal in accordance with sanction of law under sub-section (2) and (3) of section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, following the law laid d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g authority passed a very elaborate order levying service tax amount of ₹ 27,368/- which was also discharged by the respondent so also interest of ₹ 14,038/- paid thereon. When penalty of ₹ 27,368/- was imposed the adjudication auth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version