Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Salem Versus M/s. Mohan Engineering Works

2015 (10) TMI 1055 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Penalty under Section 77 Revenue contends that concessional penalty should not have been granted and penalty under section 77 should have been imposed Respondent contends that service tax liability with all the penalties imposed was discharged. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- 30-9-2015 - Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member Shri L. Paneerselvam, AC (AR) : for the Petitioner Smt. T. Mary : For the Respondent ORDER: Revenue has come in appeal with the precise submission that Commissioner (Appeals) should not have dismissed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assed order, within three months thereof Revenue has obtained order of Reviewing Authority and come in appeal in accordance with sanction of law under sub-section (2) and (3) of section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, following the law laid d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g authority passed a very elaborate order levying service tax amount of ₹ 27,368/- which was also discharged by the respondent so also interest of ₹ 14,038/- paid thereon. When penalty of ₹ 27,368/- was imposed the adjudication auth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version