TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 1130X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... India and Central PSUs of this country. It transpires from the minute of the Committee on Disputes under Sl.No.31 that appellant was permitted to contest appeal only on levy of penalty. It clearly demonstrates that the appellant was estopped to contest beyond the scope of decision of the Committee on Disputes on any other aspect. Further, the appellant has come after 7 years to the Tribunal for r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ROA/41931/2014 in E/471/2005, E/ROA/41932/2014 in E/472/2005 - - - Dated:- 16-4-2015 - D N Panda, Member (J) And R Periasami, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Raghavan Ramabadran, Mr Swetha, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr M Rammohan Rao, DC (AR) ORDER Per: D N Panda: Ld. Counsel vehemently opposes the action of the Tribunal through these restoration applications sub ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. (supra), the appellant has remedy to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal irrespective of the fact that Committee on Disputes had granted permission to pursue appeal on penalty aspect only. Unfortunately, there was no penalty imposed in the adjudication to be appealed. Therefore, for the reason aforesaid, appellant sh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ly demonstrates that the appellant was estopped to contest beyond the scope of decision of the Committee on Disputes on any other aspect. Further, the appellant has come after 7 years to the Tribunal for restoration of its appeal. It could not keep its appeal alive going to the higher court. It is therefore difficult to restore the appeals since the Tribunal does not have power to review its own o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
