New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1133 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (10) TMI 1133 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (343) E.L.T. 645 (Tri. - Del.) - Denial of CENVAT Credit - whether the glass bottles which were used for filling/packing of the aerated waters and which in course of manufacture of aerated waters were broken, and were cleared as glass scrap are excisable - Held that:- Since, CENVAT Credit had been taken in respect of the glass bottles, at the time of clearance of glass scrap, duty would be payable. However, we find that during the period of dispute th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 2 (d) of the Central Excise, Act, 1944. In view of this, we hold that the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of C. EX., Delhi Vs. Dhillon Kool Drinks & Beverages Ltd. (2000 (9) TMI 550 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI) the civil appeal against which has been dismissed by the Apex Court vide judgment reported in [2001 (5) TMI 942 - SUPREME COURT] and also judgments of Tribunal in the cases of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. Of EX., Mumbai reported in [2003 (6) TMI 346 - C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Mohanty, Member (J),JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri B L Narsimhan, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri M S Negi, DR ORDER Per: Rakesh Kumar: The appellants are manufacturers of Aerated Water. One of the inputs is glass bottles in respect of which input duty CENVAT Credit has been taken. Some glass bottles, during use get broken and the same are cleared as glass scrap. The department was of the view that the glass scrap in the form of broken glass bottles would attract Central Excise Duty. It is on thi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r (appeals), this appeal has been filed. 2. Heard both the sides. 3. Shri B.L. Narsimhan, Advocate, ld. Counsel for the appellant pleaded that the issue involved in this case has been decided in the favour of the appellant by series of judgments of the Tribunal in the case of CCE-Delhi Vs. Dhillon Kool Drinks & Beverages Ltd. reported in 2001 (130) ELT 475 (Tri-Del.), Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. Of EX., Mumbai reported in 2003 (159) ELT 938 (Tri-Mumbai), Ponna Bottling .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

payable. He, therefore, pleaded that in view of this the impugned order is not sustainable. 4. Shri M.S. Negi, ld. DR defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner (appeals). He pleaded that glass waste is specifically covered by heading 7001.10 of the tariff and hence, is excisable and under CENVAT Credit Rules, final products means, the excisable goods manufactured or produced from inputs. He also pleaded that the Tribunal's judgment cited by ld. counsel for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version