2015 (10) TMI 1137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the supplier manufacturer is to the quantum of duty already determined by the jurisdictional Revenue officers of the supplier unit, cannot be contested or challenged by the officers in charge of recipient unit. In view of that, I do not find any reason to interfere the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). - Decided against Revenue. - Appeal No. : E/1418,1419/2008 - ORDER No. A/10388-10389/2015 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he amount, they initially availed the credit. So, the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of ₹ 8,63,938/- alongwith interest and imposed penalty of equal amount of duty on Respondent No.1 and also imposed penalty of Rs. Two lakh on Shri Dhiresh Shashikant Gosalia, Managing Director of the Respondent No.1 (herein Respondent No.2). Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeals filed by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X