Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1144 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2015 (10) TMI 1144 - CESTAT CHENNAI - TMI - Duty demand - Compounded levy scheme - Determination of Annual Capacity of Production - ‘Hot air Stenter' - Independent Textile Processors - Held that:- Issue has been decided by this very bench in the case of Sanoo Fashion Pvt. Ltd.(2010 (6) TMI 712 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD), where the Tribunal by relying the Hon'ble High Court of Madras and allowed the appeal. I find that the lower appellate authority has not considered the Hon'ble High court of Madras's o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er No. 40529/2015 - Dated:- 1-5-2015 - R. Periasami, Member (T),J. For the Appellant : Mr J Shankararaman, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) ORDER Per: R Periasami: Application filed by the appellant for change of cause title from M/s. Veena Processing Mills Ltd. to M/s. Superfine Bleaching Co. Ltd. is allowed. 2. The short issue involved in this appeal relates to duty demand of ₹ 7,85,943/- under compound levy scheme for the period 1996-97 on the Hot air Stenter' in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

demanded under the rules for the period where Hot air Stenter' was closed and sealed by the department for the period 24 days in January, 2001 and 15 days in February,2001. Since it was not in operation, duty payment does not arise as the closure and seal has been duly verified by the Superintendent of Central Excise and confirmed that Hot air Stenter' was not in operation. He produced a copy of the ledger under Annexure-B page-20 of appeal papers. He also submits that the Hon'ble H .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an one month they are required to pay duty and claim abatement afterwards. 4. After hearing both sides I find that the issue has been decided by this very bench in the case of Sanoo Fashion Pvt. Ltd.(supra), where the Tribunal by relying the Hon'ble High Court of Madras and allowed the appeal. I find that the lower appellate authority has not considered the Hon'ble High court of Madras's order and relied the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat's decision in the case of Ambuja Cemen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version