TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 1180X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inst the payment of interest consequent to the earlier Order-in-Appeal, would not lie before this Tribunal as per the first proviso to Section 35 B(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as not maintainable. - Decided against Revenue. - Appeal No. : E/97/2012, E/CO/15/2012 - ORDER No. A/10679 / 2015 - Dated:- 26-5-2015 - Mr. P.K. Das, J. F ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntral Excise Customs, HQ, Rajkot, addressed to the Assistant Commissioner (AR), CESTAT before the Bench. In this letter, it is stated that Revision application filed by the department against OIA dated 13.12.2010 has been decided by the Joint Secretary (Revision Application), Government of India, New Delhi, vide order No. 867-868/2013-CX dated 05.07.2013, in favour of the assessee and the same h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
