Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Suzlon Energy Ltd Versus Commissioners of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax-VADODARA-I

2015 (10) TMI 1242 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Evasion of duty - Clearance of goods to sister concern - Duty paid under protest - Unjust enrichment - Adjustment of excess duty - Held that:- it is a case of inter-unit transfer of the goods of the appellant’s own company. In some cases, the appellant paid excess duty and there was short payment of duty of the amount of CAS-4. The Tribunal in the case of M/s Devi Thread Processors Pvt. Ltd. (2015 (3) TMI 429 - CESTAT CHENNAI) following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Bajaj Tempo Ltd .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

excess payment of duty against the short payment of duty and thereafter, the refund/demand of duty would be decided, after considering the payment of interest, if any, in accordance with law - Appeal disposed of. - Appeal No : E/1133-1134/2007 - Order No. A/ 10975-10976/2015 - Dated:- 26-6-2015 - Mr. P.K. Das and Mr. P.M, Saleem, JJ. For The Appellant (s) : Shri S.R. Dixit Advocate For The Respondent (s) : Shri L. Patra, Authorised Representative Per: P.K. Das Common issue involved in these app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed 13.02.2003, the appellants were required to pay duty as per CAS-4. Hence, the appellants, upon receipt of CAS-4 certified by Chartered Accountants, prepared a chart showing that during the period May 2005 to March 2006, as per CAS-4, they paid excess duty ₹ 16,55,983.00 and short paid duty ₹ 13,38,401.00. They requested the Department for adjustment of excess/short payment of duty. But, at the instance of Central Excise officers, the appellant paid duty ₹ 13,38,401.00 under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the refund claim on the ground of unjust enrichment. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld both the adjudication orders. 3. The Learned Advocate on behalf of the appellants submits that it is a case of inter-unit transfer of the goods and there is no sale to the independent buyer. The appellants requested to adjust the excess amount of duty against the short payment of duty and ultimately, it would be excess payment of duty, which may be refunded. He relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version