Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Star Industries Versus Commissioner of Customs (Imports) , Raigad

Exemption from payment of CVD - Manufacture of Ferro-Alloys - Whether the 'Ore Concentrate' imported by the assessee is eligible for complete exemption from payment of additional duty of custom/CVD under Notification No.4/2006-CE? Appellant submits that entire exercise is Revenue neutral and assessee can avail CENVAT credit of the duty paid.

Held That:- Tribunal has rightly arrived at the conclusion that by virtue of Note 4, concentrate has to be necessarily treated as different fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rictly and even if there is some doubt, benefit thereof shall not enure to the assessee but would be given to the Revenue. - Decision made in the case of IVRCL Infrastructure & Projects Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai [2015 (4) TMI 562 - SUPREME COURT] followed

Contention of Revenue is held correct - Assessee being appellant and exercise of Revenue is neutral; no need to file the appeal arises Be that as it may, if that is so, it is always open to the assessee to claim such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The assessee has been regularly importing the aforesaid material i.e. Roasted Molybdenum Ore/Concentrate (hereinafter referred to as the 'Ore Concentrate'). 2. It is not in dispute that the import of Ore Concentrate is, otherwise, subject to additional duty of custom i.e. countervailing duty (CVD) in addition to normal custom duty. However, vide Notification No. 4/2006-CE dated March 01, 2011, which is a general exemption notification, various items, either fully or partially, exempted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m payment of additional duty of custom/CVD under Notification No.4/2006-CE dated March 01, 2006. The answer to the aforesaid question would depend upon the answer to another incidental question, namely, whether the 'Ore Concentrate' imported by the assessee can be treated as 'Ores' mentioned in Notification No.4/2006. To put it otherwise, whether Molybdenum Ore after it undergoes the process of being roasted and comes to be known as Ore Concentrate still remains Ores. 3. Before w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ceived some information indicating that the assessee was misdeclaring the product as 'Molybdenum Ore' or 'Roasted Molybdenum Ore' and on that basis, seeking benefit of exemption under Notification No.4/2006-CE. According to them, Roasted Molybdenum Ore was, in fact, Ore Concentrate which was different from 'Ores' and, therefore, benefit of said Notification No.4/2006-CE was not available to the assessee. Based on the above intelligence, two consignments of the assessee im .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

importation were drawn and sent for chemical examination to Chemical Examiner, CRCL, Vadodara. On that basis, the goods/consignment was seized on September 26, 2011 under the provisions of Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the reasonable plea that they are liable to confiscation under Section 111 of the said Act. 5. Statement of Shri Babu Khandelwal, Partner of the assessee-firm was recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, wherein, he, inter alia, admitted that the goods under impor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

agreed with the test reports given by the Chemical Examiner. As regards CVD exemption under Notification 4/2006-CE, Shri Khandelwal stated that since ores include concentrates, he had claimed the exemption. He also agreed to pay the CVD involved in respect of the imports made under the aforesaid Bills of Entry. The seized goods valued at ₹ 6,12,60,943/- were released provisionally to the assessee on execution of a bond for the said value and bank guarantee of ₹ 61,26,200/-. The asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

000 kgs. of Roasted Molybdenum Ore Concentrate seized on September 26, 2011 valued at ₹ 6,12,61,048/- and 275000 kgs. of the said goods valued at ₹ 28,57,49,418/- imported earlier under 14 Bills of Entry, under the provisions of Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. The notice also proposed to demand differential duty amounting to ₹ 66,61,664/- on the seized goods and ₹ 3,10,73,035/- on the goods imported earlier, under the provisions of Section 28(1) of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re under Section 125 of the said Act and those imported earlier was liable for confiscation under the same provisions in respect of which differential duty demand of ₹ 66,61,664/- and ₹ 3,10,73,035/- were confirmed by denying the benefit of CVD exemption along with interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act. A penalty of equivalent amount was also imposed on the assessee under Section 114A of the said Act. 8. Aforesaid order was challenged by the assessee in the form of an appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d penalty under Section 112(a)/114A of the Customs Act. The outcome of the appeal is summed up in para 8, which reads as under: 8. To sum up, we uphold the duty demand and interest thereon under the provisions of Sections 28 of the Customs Act along with interest thereon under Section 28AA. However, we set aside the confiscation of the goods under Section 111 of the said Act and imposition of redemption fine under Section 125 and penalty under Section 114A ibid. 9. Before we proceed further, it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l. No.10 of the said notification from payment of excise duty. There also the adjudicating authority had taken the view that after the Molybdenum Ore was subjected to the process of Concentratic and Roasting it had become a different product, namely, Molybdenum Oxide and did not remain 'Ore' and, therefore, was not entitled to the benefit of exemption notification which applied only to the commodity 'Ore'. In an appeal, however, same Mumbai Bench of CESTAT set aside the order of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rd the finding that Concentrate is to be understood as nothing but enriched and prepared ore meaning thereby it remains the same product, namely, 'Ores' even after the aforesaid processing of Roasting. Before discussing this order and to understand the implication thereof in an appropriate manner, it is necessary to point out the tariff entries and all relevant provisions of the exemption notification. 10. Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with 'Ores, Slag and A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection XIV or XV, even if they are intended for non-metallurgical purposes. Headings 2601 to 2617 do not, however, include minerals which have been submitted to processes not normal to the metallurgical industry. 11. There was an amendment in the said Chapter in the year 2011, whereby, inter alia, Chapter Note 4 was added, which reads as under: 4. In relation to products of this Chapter, the process of converting ores into concentrates shall amount to manufacture . 12. Description of Tariff Item .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sub-section (1) of Section 5A of the Central Excise Act in the public interest, thereby exempting excisable goods of the description specified in column (3) of the table below read with the relevant List appended hereto. Item 3 thereof reads as under: S. No. Chapter or heading or sub-heading or tariff item of the First Schedule Description of excisable goods Rate Condition No. 4. 2601 to 2617 Ores Nil - We would like to point out that the amendment which was carried out in the year 2011 basical .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed position that for the purpose of determining the levy of CVD under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, it is to be deemed that the product that was imported was manufactured in India and thereafter rate of central excise duty leviable thereupon is to be determined. That duty becomes the CVD i.e. the additional duty on the import of the item. This position stands settled by the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in Hyderabad Industries Limited and another v. Union of India and others ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o obtain concentrate, does not amount to manufacture, especially because of the reason that roasting is a process by which impurities in the ore are removed and the recoverable content of metal oxide is enhanced. The Tribunal also held that the product in question attracted 'Nil' duty as it was covered by exemption notification because of the reason that Ore and Concentrate are one and the same and hence entitled to the exemption. While answering the two questions in the aforesaid manner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Concentrate also means a product of concentration i.e. enriched ore after removal of waste in a beneficiation mill. Ore. A mineral or aggregate of minerals from which a valuable constituent, especially a metal, can be recovered at a profit. 17. Having regard to the aforesaid definitions, the Tribunal opined that the term Concentrate has to be understood as nothing but enriched and prepared ore. The Tribunal, thereafter, relied upon judgment of this Court in Minerals and Metals Trading Corporati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the chemical structure of the ore should remain the same. Whether the ore imported is in powder or granule form is wholly immaterial. What has been to be seen is what is meant in international trade and in the market by wolfram ore containing 60% ore more WO3. On that there is a preponderation weight of authority both of exports and books and of writings on the subject which show that wolfram ore when detached and taken out from the rock in which it is embedded either by crushing the rock an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the recoverable content of metal oxide is enhanced thereby. Thus, ore and concentrate are one and the same as concentrate remains ore and only impurities were removed therefrom. Again, referring to the judgment of this Court in MMTC (supra), the Tribunal made the following observations: ...Therefore, 'Ore' is genus and 'Concentrate' is species. Therefore, under Central Excise exempting ore concentrates of ores would also be exempted. Sl. No.10 of Notification No. 5/98-CE grants u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

applying same principle while construing the word 'ore' appearing in the Notification No. 5/98 will call for coverage of the concentrate. It is clear from the judgment of Supreme Court in MMTC's case, that 'ore' is genus and 'concentrate' a species. Therefore, separate mention of 'ore' and 'concentrate' in Heading 26.03 ipsofacto will not imply they are different. Therefore, term 'ore' covered by Notification No. 5/98 can apply to 'concentr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ary condition of Note 2 of Chapter 26 viz. the imported goods are used for the metals of Section XV, is satisfied, the second condition of Note 2 of Chapter 26 is also satisfied inasmuch as the imported concentrate had not been subjected to process not normal to the metallurgical industry. The department, in fact, has stated in the ground of appeal that by virtue of Note 2 to Chapter 26, the goods have been classified under Heading 2613.10. Therefore, concentrate in question when it satisfies an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

This process did not amount to any manufacture and, therefore, no new item, commercially known, come into existence. 21. Mr. Adhyaru, learned senior counsel appearing for the Revenue submitted that the aforesaid decision was rendered in the context of unamended Chapter 26 and this was before the addition of Chapter Note 4. He pointed out that judgment in MMTC was also of the same vintage. According to him, addition of Note 4 to Chapter 26 made fundamental difference, thereby, rendering the decis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as emphatic in his submission that now conversion of ore into concentrate was treated as manufacture and, therefore, the concentrate could not be treated as same product as ore and it had transformed into an altogether different product. On that basis, he proceeded to build up his case by submitting that Tariff Item 2601 which describes the goods as 'iron ores and concentrates, including roasted iron pyrite' clearly treated the two items differently i.e. iron ore on the one hand and conc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ates but the exemption notification exempted only 'ores' with conspicuous absence of concentrate, such an exemption notification was to be given strict interpretation and even if two views were possible, the view which favours the Revenue had to be preferred while interpreting exemption notification. 22. On this basis, grounding his plea on Chapter note 4, he made a passionate plea that the impugned decision in appeal took into consideration the aforesaid significant change in law with t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

adings have been provided for iron ore lumps, iron ore fines and iron ore concentrates. From the above structure, it is clear that the use of the expression 'ores and concentrates' and provision of separate sub-headings of ores and concentrates wherever necessary, implies that the legislature consciously made a distinction between 'ores' on the one hand and 'concentrates' on the other. The preposition and between the two terms is conjunctive. If the legislative intention .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Legislature as disclosed from the context. (Ishwar Singh Bindra v. State of U.P., AIR 1968 SC 360, p. 363 : (1980) 1 SCC 158; R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay (1984) 2 SCC 183, pp. 224, 225 : AIR 1984 SC 684; M. Satyanarayana v. State of Karnataka (1986) 2 SCC 512, p. 515 : AIR 1986 SC 1162). As stated by SCRUTTON L.J.: You do sometimes read 'or' as 'and' in a statute. But you do not do it unless you are obliged because 'or' does not generally mean 'and' and 'and& .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntention of it requires that to be done. (Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v. Henderson Bros. (1888) 13 AC 595 (HL) p. 603. See further, Puran Singh v. State of M.P., AIR 1965 SC 1583 p. 1584, (para 5); Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Tek Chand Bhatia, supra. But if the literal reading of the words is less favourable to the subject provided that the intention of the legislature is otherwise quite clear. [A.G. v. Beauchamp (1920) 1 KB 650; R. v. Oakes (1959) 2 All ER 92] In the case before us, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d to treat 'ores' and 'concentrates' distinctly and differently. Otherwise, there was no need for the legislature to employ these two terms with a conjunctive 'and' in between. If one treats ores and concentrates synonymously, as argued by the learned counsel for the appellant, that would render the term concentrate redundant which is not permissible. 23. He also impressed upon this Court to keep in mind the purpose of treating the process of roasting a manufacturing proc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acture', still for the purpose of applying exemption notification concentrate would still be covered by umbrella term, 'ore' of which it was a specie. He reiterated that roasting of ore was only to remove impurities so that it could be used in the manufacture of Ferro-Alloys. He also argued that even 'roasted ore' was in Chapter Heading 26 and the process, as defined in the technical dictionaries, makes it only an enriched ore. He further argued that Chapter Note 2, which was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sic principle enshrined in MMTC judgment, namely, ore is genus and concentrate is specie, still remains valid even after the addition of Chapter Note 4. 25. We have thoughtfully considered the respective arguments of counsel for both the parties. 26. Before we discuss these arguments and arrive at a particular conclusion, we would like to recapitulate the salient features of the case about which there is no dispute: (a) The assessee is seeking benefit of Notification No.4/2006-CE and relies upon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee were not Molybdenum Ores in original form as mined. They had admittedly undergone the process of roasting and after the roasting, they are known as 'concentrates'. Even the assessee has described these goods as 'Roasted Molybdenum Ore Concentrate.' (d) Chapter Note 4 treats the aforesaid process of roasting Ores into Concentrate as 'manufacture'. 27. On the aforesaid facts, case of the assessee was that since ores include concentrates, assessee had claimed exempt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tire decision proceeds on the basis that roasting of an ore to obtain concentrate does not amount to manufacture specially when roasting is a process by which impurities in the ore are removed and the recoverable content of metal oxide is enhanced. In support, reference was made to Kirk-Othmer's Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Likewise, in MMTC case as well, which was relied upon by the Tribunal, this Court had held that Wolfram Concentrate which was having minimum 65% Tungsten Oxide wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

basic and the common thread which runs throughout the decision is that subjecting ore to the process of roasting does not amount to manufacture. This very basis gets knocked off with the amendment carried out in the year 2011 with the insertion of Note 4. Note 4 now categorically mentions that the process of converting ores into concentrates would amount to 'manufacture'. Therefore, it cannot now be argued that roasting of ores and converting the same into concentrates would not be manu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

um Ore is different from concentrate. That is inherent in treating the process as 'manufacture' inasmuch as manufacture results in a different commodity from the earlier one. Section 2(f) defines this term as under: manufacture includes any process,- (i) incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product; (ii) which is specified in relation to any goods in the Section or Chapter notes of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) as amounting t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

here was no reason to deem the process of converting ores into concentrates as manufacture. 29. Once the aforesaid legal repercussions are taken note of, as a fortiori, it becomes obvious that Notification No. 4/2006-CE which exempts only ores would not include within itself 'concentrates' also because of the reason that after the insertion of Note 4, concentrate is to be treated as a different product than ores, in law for the purposes of products of Chapter 26. 30. This brings us to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Note 4, these two Notes, namely, Note 2 and Note 4 have to be read harmoniously. If we accept the submission of the learned counsel for the assessee predicated on Note 2, then Note 4 even after its conscious inclusion, would be rendered otiose which cannot be countenanced. Therefore, Note 2, when seen along with Note 4, has to govern itself in limited territory. On the basis of deeming fiction created by Note 4, once we arrive at the conclusion that process of roasting of Ore amounts to manufact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y arrived at the conclusion that by virtue of Note 4, concentrate has to be necessarily treated as different from ores which is deemed as manufactured product after Molybdenum Ores underwent the process of roasting. Once we keep in mind that conversion of ores into concentrate is considered as manufacture and, therefore, becomes liable for central excise levy, exemption Notification No. 4/2006-CE is to be interpreted in this light as the Legislature has intended to treat ores and concentrates as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ents of this Court taking this view consistently. 32. In M/s. Navopan India Ltd., Hyderabad v. Collector of Central Excise and another 1994 (73) ELT 769 (SC), this principle of interpretation of an exemption notification was summarised in the following words: We are, however, of the opinion that, on principle, the decision of the Court in Mangalore Chemicals -and in Union of India v. Wood Papers, referred to therein -represents the correct view of law. The principle that in case of ambiguity, a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hemicals and other decisions, viz., each such exception/exemption increases the tax burden on other members of the community correspondingly. Once, of course, the provision is found applicable to him, full effect must be given to it. As observed by a Constitution Bench of this Court in Hansraj Gordhandas v. H.H. Dave, (1969) 2 SCR 253 that such a Notification has to be interpreted in the light of the words employed by it and not on any other basis. This was so held in the context of the principl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. ...We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. We find that the first argument made by Shri Lakshmikumaran can be disposed of immediately. The subject matter before us is an exemption notification issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962. The interpretative notes that have been referred to by Shri Lakshmikumaran are in the Customs Tariff Act. Note 2(a) referred to by Shri Lakshmikumaran reads as follows: 2.(a) Any reference in a heading to an article shall be taken to include a refe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Customs Act. Therefore, the fact that an unassembled plant which is incomplete but which has the essential character of a complete plant is not the test to be applied in the present case. On the other hand, the applicable test would be what has been laid down in a catena of decisions. Two such decisions will suffice. In Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. Tullow India Operations Ltd. (2005) 13 SCC 789 = 2005 (189) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.), this Court held: 34. The principles as regards constr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

G.P. Ceramics Private Limited v. Commissioner, Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh, (2009) 2 SCC 90, this Court held: 29. It is not a well-established principle of law that whereas eligibility criteria laid down in an exemption notification are required to be construed strictly, once it is found that the applicant satisfies the same, the exemption notification should be construed liberally. [See CTT v. DSM Group of Industries, (2005) 1 SCC 657 (SCC para 26); TISCO v. State of Jharkhand (2005) 4 SCC 272 (SC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bled form. Judged by this test, it is clear that the concurrent findings of fact of the Commissioner and the CESTAT requires no interference by the Court inasmuch as both authorities have held that a complete plant in an unassembled form has not in fact been imported... 34. The Tribunal in the impugned judgment has also examined the issue keeping in view the objective behind the levy of CVD. Such a discussion proceeds as under: It will be useful at this juncture to examine the object of levy of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India. In the notes to clauses to the Customs Tariff Bill 1975 with regard to clause 3 it was stated that Clause 3 provides for the levy of additional duty on an imported article to counter-balance the excise duty leviable on the like article made indigenously, or on the indigenous raw materials, components or ingredients which go into the making of the like indigenous article. This provision corresponds to section 2A of the existing Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version