Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of the limitation u/s 275(1)(c) i.e. that no order of penalty could have been passed u/s 271-E after the expiry of the financial year in which the quantum proceedings were completed or beyond six months after the month in which they were initiated whichever was later. - HC

Income Tax - Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of the limitation u/s 275(1)(c), i.e., that no order of penalty could have been passed u/s 271-E after the expiry of the fina .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version