Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

WINSOME TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH

2015 (10) TMI 1323 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Denial of rebate claim - Bar of limitation - Held that:- The contention of the learned AR is not acceptable in the light of report submitted by the Range officer dated 22-9-2010 confirming that refund claim has been filed within time. Therefore, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs and in almost every document received by the departmental officer has no name and is unstamped. Therefore, the contention of the learned AR is not factual. Moreover the fact is on record that they have filed rebate claim which has been confirmed b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2015 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) Shri Rupender Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri G.R. Singh, (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order rejecting their rebate claim on the premise that rebate clai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of goods for the period January, 2008 to March, 2008 while the refund claim was filed before the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise Division, Shimla on 28-5-2008. The refund claim was rejected by the lower authorities on the premise that rebate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2008 and report was sought from the concerned authorities and vide their letter dated 28-9-2010, they have confirmed the fact that exporter has filed the rebate claim within the time prescribed in the notification claimed by the appellants. But same .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me and stamp of the department and therefore same cannot be accepted. 5. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 6. The contention of the learned AR is not acceptable in the light of report submitted by the Range officer dated 22-9-2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version