TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 1354X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arges, RPO Surcharges, Railway Siding/Shunting Charges, Airfield etc. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of duty alongwith interest and imposed penalty for the period March, 1994 to June 1996 on the ground that the appellants cleared the goods from Vadodara Refineries to Sabarmati Terminal and the expenses incurred after clearance of the goods from Vadodara Refinery would be included ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri Sameer Chitkara, Authorised Representative For the Respondent : Shri Sachin Chinta, Advocate ORDER Per: P.K. Das Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), where the adjudication order was set-aside and the appeal of the respondent was allowed. 2. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, we find that the Adjudicating Aut ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... factory gate. The commissioner (Appeals) observed as under:- The charges incurred after clearance from the factory gate are not supposed to form a part of assessable value. Even equalized freight were abatable from price towards working of the cost, further to that extent, on merits of the case, pipeline charges have to be considered as post clearance expenditure. The normal place of removal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on offered by the IOC that pipelines charges are nothing but transport charges incurred for supply of various refinery products through pipe line from the factory (refinery gate to Sabarmati Terminal. The position of law as already laid down in BPCL case; when IOC declared and demonstrated that the pipeline charges are nothing else than the transportation charges, then such charges should not have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
