Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle 37 (1) , New Delhi Versus Mr. Rajneesh Chopra And Vica-Versa

Determination of Income from profession - Held that:- It is an undisputed position that certain registers incorporating month-wise professional receipts and expenses in cash and cheques along with month-wise profit were impounded during the course of survey. Such registers pertained to various years. In so far as the assessment year under consideration is concerned, total income was computed by the AO from such registers to the tune of ₹ 54.00 lac. In the absence of any worthwhile objectio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mistakes to the AO in his calculation of professional receipts and expenses for the year in question but the AO chose not to adversely comment the same, the natural presumption is that the assessee’s calculation was correct. Under these circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that the ld. CIT(A) was justified in sustaining the addition at ₹ 40,17,517/-. We are unable to comprehend the rationale behind the assessee’s assailing the addition to the extent sustained in the first appea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

702611 maintained with ABN Amro Bank, were transfer entries from one account to another. Even entry-wise details were also furnished which the AO refused to accept for want of any further corroboration. When the current account and savings bank account were available with him, the AO was obliged to cross check the entries. The ld. CIT(A) has examined this aspect and found the assessee’s contention correct. The ld. DR failed to controvert the position ascertained by the ld. CIT(A) in this regard. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

interest - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- it is noticed that bank interest of ₹ 15,490/- emanating from the savings bank account which was not disclosed by the assessee and other credit entries in this bank account, except the transfer entries, have been separately added, for which we have sustained an addition of ₹ 2,82,838/-. Since the bank interest of ₹ 15,490/- is part of such addition sustained in the first appeal, any further addition for the bank interest wou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Revenue - arise out of the order passed by the CIT(A) on 26.12.2012 in relation to the assessment year 2005-06. This is a recalled matter. 2. First two grounds of the Revenue s appeal are against reducing the Income from profession from ₹ 54,00,899/- as determined by the Assessing Officer (AO) to ₹ 40,17,517/-. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an Advocate by profession, who filed his original return declaring a total income of ₹ 3,43,550/-. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y operations, certain diaries, registers, loose papers, data from computer copied in hard disk etc. were impounded. These documents were marked as Annexure A-1 to A-27. Entries in these registers were confronted to the assessee during the course of recording of his statement at the time of survey on 1.2.2010. Vide question no. 10, the assessee was required to produce his books of account for the assessment year 2005-06 to 2009-10, in response to which it was stated that the same will be produced .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e prepared details of cash receipts from these registers which were not declared in the income for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2010-11. Although the assessee admitted that these entries were reflected in the register, but, showed ignorance about their non-reflection in the returns of income. On a further query as to whether these entries represented any other receipts such as loan, gift, etc., the assessee replied in negative. After examining the entire impounded material, it was observed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has been incorporated on pages 5 and 6 of the assessment order. On appreciation of the entire material before him, the AO noticed that only cheque receipts were offered for taxation by the assessee and the fee collected in cash was not shown as income. The assessee was given ample opportunity to produce his books of account, bills and vouchers for the expenses during the course of assessment proceedings. No such details were furnished. The AO noticed that the impounded register transpired that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed during the month in cash or through cheques. Month-wise working of profit from 1.4.2004 to 31.3.2005 as recorded in the register A-7 has been tabulated by the AO on page 9 of assessment order as under:- S. No. Month Name of annexure of impound ed material Receipts recorded from pages (in Rs.) Total amount of receipts during the month (in Rs.) Expenses of cheque Expenses of cash (by other name) Net profit for the month Page No. 1 April, 2004 A-7 77-74 4,94,580 50,583 76,711 3,67,286 74 2 May,, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9/- 5,35,806 30 10 Jan, 2005 -do- 29-23 7,87,609/- 2,03,546/- 1,13,949/- 4,70,114 23 11 Feb., 2005 -do- 22-17 6,16,706/- 1,56,924/- 88,700/- 3,71,082 17 12 March, 2005 -do- 16-10 10,05,307/- 1,89,077/- 1,21,143/- 6,95,087 10 Total 88,13,906/- 13,33,395/ 13,14,147/- 61,66,364 4. The AO noticed that the above calculation of net profit from the register maintained by the assessee for the period relevant to the assessment year under consideration divulged income of ₹ 61,66,364/-, which was muc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

egisters impounded during the course of survey were not properly maintained. The assessee filed a chart to reflect the effect of discrepancies in the register as under:- Month As per AO Brought forward difference Cash difference Other differences Balance Amount June, 2004 416680 9425 55800 351455 July, 2004 605259 3045 114546 487668 Aug, 2004 1699797 341329 1358468 Sept., 2004 861399 158687 702712 Oct, 2004 491775 7000 169515 315260 Nov, 2004 593113 176860 416253 Dec, 2004 714291 50000 88649 575 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

months, namely, April and May, 2004 because this was earned by the partnership firm in which the assessee was a partner at the material time. After deducting net profit of April and May, 2004 amounting to ₹ 3,67,286/- and ₹ 3,98,189/- respectively, from the total net profit as per Register A-7 amounting to ₹ 61.66 lac as reproduced above, the AO determined the amount of professional income at ₹ 54,00,889/-. Since this was the amount of month-wise net profit as per the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ate proceedings, the assessee filed, inter alia, a summary of recordings in the impounded register containing infirmities in the calculation of income as made by the AO. The same was sent by the ld. CIT(A) to the AO for comments. The AO vide his letter dated 15.10.2012 concurred with the view of his predecessor and did not mention anything further refuting the claims/objections made by the assessee. The assessee was also given an opportunity to file his comments against the AO s remand report, w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the extent of ₹ 13,83,372/-. The Revenue is contesting such relief allowed by the ld. first appellate authority and the assessee is assailing the confirmation of addition made in the first appeal. 6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material available on record. It is an undisputed position that certain registers incorporating month-wise professional receipts and expenses in cash and cheques along with month-wise profit were impounded during the course of su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it submitted by the assessee with any cogent material. When the position is such, we fail to appreciate as to how a different view can be taken from the one canvassed by the ld. CIT(A). It is palpable that when the assessee pointed out mistakes to the AO in his calculation of professional receipts and expenses for the year in question but the AO chose not to adversely comment the same, the natural presumption is that the assessee s calculation was correct. Under these circumstances, we are of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal. 7. Ground no. 3 is against restricting the addition of income from undisclosed sources from ₹ 4,99,266/- to ₹ 2,82,838/-. The assessee has also challenged the sustenance of addition. 8. Succinctly, the facts of this ground are that the assessee also maintained a savings bank account No.702611 with ABN Amro Bank (Now RBS) during the year under consideration, which was not disclosed for income-tax purpose. The AO extracted deposits in the said savings account from 1.4.2004 to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

representing deposits in this bank account to the tune of ₹ 36,295/-. He further observed that the assessee was a partner in Costa & Chopra, Advocates in April, 2004 and drew a salary of ₹ 7,500/- for each month, which was not separately shown as taxable. In the absence of submitting any proof about the claim of transfer entries from another bank account to this bank account, the AO held that the entire amount of ₹ 4,99,266/- (Rs.5,35,560 - ₹ 36,295/-) was undisclose .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccount to another. The ld. CIT(A) found correct the assessee s contention about the transfer of money from current account to savings bank account. The Revenue is not happy with the deletion of addition to this extent and the assessee is opposing the sustenance of pro tanto addition. 9. Having heard both the sides on the point and perused the relevant material on record, it is observed that the assessee categorically stated before the AO that certain deposits in saving bank account no. 702611 ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version