TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 1535X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts seized be removed from their premises - Held That:- There is no justifiable reason for retaining goods in the premises of the Petitioner as the same does not have a license of CFS – Respondents are directed either to auction the confiscated goods or otherwise shift them from the place of the Petitioner – Decided in favour of the Assessee. - W.P.No. 5611 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 14-8-2015 - Mr. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dent, was required to periodically grant renewal of the warehouse license and the last such renewal was granted to the petitioner Company upto 22.05.2013. 2.2 The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that due to various operational reasons and practical difficulties faced by the petitioner Company in moving the cargo, they could not operate the CFS smoothly. Hence, the petiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... now, the petitioner Company does not have the CFS status and also any bonded warehouse license and hence, as per the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, the goods lying in the petitioner's premises as on date, cannot continue to remain there. 2.5 That apart, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though a number of representations were given to the respondents right from ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e said 23 consignments listed in the Annexure from the petitioner's premises forthwith. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 4. After confiscation of the goods by the authorities, the goods are kept unnecessarily in the warehouse belonging to the petitioner. Repeated representations of the petitioner have never been considered, which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
