Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1603 - ITAT MUMBAI

2015 (10) TMI 1603 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - treatment of transactions in shares and mutual funds - whether assessable under the head 'income from short term capital gains' as declared by the assessee and whether to be assessed under the head 'income from business' - Held that:- As decided in assessee's own case relating to assessment year 2006-2007 till last assessment year the assessee was showing income from share business under the head business income, that during the ye .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision taken in quantum proceedings, it cannot be held that the assessee had concealed particulars of income. It is said that decision in the assessment proceedings do not result in automatic imposition of penalty. In the matter before us, the assessee had filed all the necessary details before the AO. There was difference of opinion between the assessee and the AO about the treatment to be given to the share transactions undertaken by the assessee. The admission of the appeal by the Hon'ble juri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome-tax (Appeals), dated 13.08.2013, relating to assessment year 2007-2008 against levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The Revenue has raised following grounds of appeal:- "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, observing that mere disallowance of a claim would not entail imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al gains. b) As found by the Ld.CIT(A) during quantum appeal and as subsequently upheld by the ITAT, the share trading business carried on by the assessee till A.Y. 2005-06 remained the same in A.Y. 2006-07 & 2007-08 and therefore, the short term capital gains on share trading business claimed by the assessee was a false claim. c) The Ld.CIT(A) in the order in quantum appeal found that the fact of closing stock of shares of ₹ 3,82,77,523/- as on 31.03.2005 had been concealed by the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r of the CIT(A) on the above ground be set aside and that of the A.O. be restored. 5. The appellant craves leave to amend or alter any grounds or add a new ground which may be necessary." 3. The only issue raised in the present appeal is against levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The learned AR for the assessee at the outset pointed out that the issue of levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the order of the Tribunal in assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d as business income in the hands of the assessee. Rejecting the explanation of the assessee, the A.O. assessed the said income under the head 'income from business'. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act were initiated against the assessee. The AO noted in the order levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, that the facts of the case were identical to the facts in assessment year 2006-2007 and following the same, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) was levied for filing inaccurate particulars .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt of transactions in shares and mutual funds whether assessable under the head 'income from short term capital gains' as declared by the assessee and whether to be assessed under the head 'income from business', had held as under:- "6. We have heard rival submissions and perused material before us. We find that the AO had held that assessee company was engaged trading in share and had not made investments, that First Appellate Authority (FAA) had upheld the quantum order pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version