Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Sujag Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (3) , Baroda

2015 (10) TMI 1613 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Disallowance of depreciation on goodwill - Held that:- Respectfully following the decision of CIT Vs. SMIFS Securities [2012 (8) TMI 713 - SUPREME COURT] wherein the doctrin of ejusdem generic is applied and held that the Goodwill is of like nature of intangible asset as prescribed, therefore, we hereby hold that under the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case the assessee is entitled for the claim of depreciation on the DWV of the goodwill for the year under consideration. - Decid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nfirming the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill. 3. The brief facts of the case are that assessee has filed its return of income on 23-12-2006 declaring total income of ₹ 5,39,660/-. An assessment order was passed u/s. 143(3) on 22-12-2008 determining total income at ₹ 90,90,889/-. On verification of depreciation claimed, it revealed to the Ld. Assessing Officer that, assessee has claimed depreciation of ₹ 1,09,810/- @ 25% written down value of goodwill. According to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

goodwill was allowed to the assessee. He placed on record the copy of the Tribunal s order passed in ITA No. 2087/Ahd/s2012. Ld. Departmental Representative was unable to controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the assessee. 6. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances, we find that issue in dispute is squarely covered by the order of ITAT passed in Assessment Year 2003-04. The discussion made by the Tribunal in Assessment Year 2003-04 on this issue reads as under:- 6. We .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

company had taken over the erstwhile firm. He has also placed reliance on Vyomit Shares, Stocks & Investments P. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, 106, ITD 408 (Mum). 7. On the other hand, from the side of the respondent assessee, learned AR, Mr. Sunil Toloti appeared and placed reliance on SMIFS Securities, 348 ITR 302 (SC), B. Raveendran Pillai Vs. CIT, 332 ITR 531 (2011) (Ker) and CIT Vs. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. (Delhi), 331 ITR 192 (2011). 8. Facts of the case have revealed that the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

after for A.Y. 1999-00, 2000-01 and 2001-02, the assessee company had claimed depreciation @ 25% as informed by learned AR, Mr. Sunil Talati. The WDV for the year under consideration is ₹ 10,47,157/- over which the depreciation @ 25% amounting to ₹ 2,60,289/- was claimed. On account of these facts, we hereby hold that the goodwill was acquired after 1st day of April, 1998 as required u/s. 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Now the only question left for our consideration is that whether goodwill .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version