Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Master Share & Stock Brokers Ltd. Versus Master Share & Stock Brokers Ltd.

Penalty for Violation of SEBI Circular read with Clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct; Regulation 15 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 Whether 4 terminals, out of terminals granted, at 3 locations were allotted to ultimate clients in contravention to said regulations? Held That:- Terminals under issue not managed by authorized employee or by sub-broker himself - Appellant found guilty of violating the Circular as well as the Code of Con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich penalty of ₹ 3 lac has been imposed on the Appellant for violation of Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ) Circular dated 22nd October, 2001 read with Clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct as prescribed under Schedule II, Regulation 15 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 (for short Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers Regulations, 1992 ). 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Appellant namely, Master Share & St .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tock Brokers and Sub-Brokers Regulations, 1992 along with the provisions of SEBI Circular dated 22nd October, 2001. SEBI accordingly appointed an Adjudicating Officer to conduct detailed enquiry into the matter as per the SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995 and adjudge under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992. Accordingly, a show-cause notice dated 18th October, 2013 was issued to the Appellant and it filed a reply dated 30th November, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2nd October, 2001 thereby violating the provisions of the Code of Conduct and the Regulations in question. 4. The learned counsel for the Appellant, Shri Prakash Shah, vehemently argued that 4 terminals at 3 locations in dispute were being run by the professionals who were appointed on contract basis and there was no bar in having terminals fixed at other locations. 5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the pleadings and provisions of law in detail. Para 2 of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ses and it should be within the knowledge of the Stock Exchange as well as SEBI that the terminals are being run at the office of the broker or its branch office or at the registered sub-broker s office. No other place is authorized to have a trading terminal. The relevant portion of the said Circular dated 22nd October, 2001 is reproduced hereinbelow for facility of reference: Grant of trading terminals It has further come to the notice of SEBI that the trading terminals granted to the stockbro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ir trading terminals of unregistered sub-broking activities. Stock Exchanges are also advised to amend their bye-laws suitably to prohibit their members from dealing with sub-brokers who are not registered with SEBI. 6. We find from the contents of the show-cause notice and the impugned order that crux of the allegations against the Appellant is that he allotted trading terminals to the ultimate clients, which is prohibited by SEBI. The legality of the Circular is not in dispute. Therefore, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ect control of the trading member and be managed either by an authorized employee or by a registered sub-broker of the trading member. In the present case, admittedly, the 4 terminals at 3 locations in dispute were managed by a consultants/persons engaged on contract basis and not by authorized employee or by the sub-broker himself. 7. Turning to the point urged by Shri Prakash Shah that the penalty is unjustified and any minor punishment would have sufficed the purpose. In this context, we woul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version