Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Hemangi Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune I

2015 (10) TMI 1732 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Imposition of penalty – fabrication/alteration of TR-6/GAR-7 challans and bogus challans - fraudulent act on the part of the Consultant who had pocketed the amounts of service tax which has been paid by the appellant to him to pay into the Govt. treasury - Case of Revenue is that no criminal complaint filed against consultant by appellant – Further service tax returns were signed by appellant indicating the tax liability – penalty imposed is thus sustainable. - Manpower Recruitment or Supply Age .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. ST/239/11 - Final Order No. A/3214/2015-WZB/STB - Dated:- 30-9-2015 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. C.J. Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri Anupam Dighe, Advocate with Ms Chandani Tanna, Advocate : For The Petitioner Ms. Vinitha Sekhar, Dy. Commr. (AR) : For The Respondent ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against order-in-original No. PI/COMMR/Service Tax/14/2011 dated 25.01.2011. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are appellant herein is registere .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penalty. Adjudicating authority after following due process of law, confirmed the tax liability with interest and imposed equivalent amount of penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994. 3. Learned Counsel would submit that appellant is in fact at receiving end due to the Consultants embezzlement of the amounts. He submits that appellant had appointed one Mr. Deepak Joshi, Consultant to look into the regular activities of discharge of service tax and also for payment of the service tax. His s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has discharged the entire service tax liability and the interest thereof as has been worked out based upon the statement of Mr. Deepak Joshi. It is his submission that appellant is not contesting the service tax liability but is seeking setting aside the penalties imposed on the ground that they are in fact hurt by the action of the Consultant. He would submit that the appellant now produces the copy of the cash book for the relevant period which indicates withdrawal of cash from the bank for pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CESTAT-MUM same view was reached by the Tribunal and held that penalty is not imposable on the assessee. 4. Learned D.R. on the other hand, would submit that the appellant was in the knowledge of the activity undertaken by the Consultant. It is her submission that the statement of the Consultant Mr. Deepak Joshi clearly indicates that appellant had paid only 50% of the amount as has been recorded in the said statement. It is her submission that the cash book and the certificate of the C.A. as pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Hon ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Indsur Global Ltd. V. Commissioner of Service Tax 2015 (38) STR 14 (Guj.). It is also her submission that the vicarious liability of any payment of service tax and interest thereof lies on the appellant. For this purpose she would read Section 238 of the Indian Contract Act and submit that appellant is liable to be penalized for mis-representation or fraud by agents. It is her submission that this view has been upheld by the Hon ble Bombay High .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nts of service tax which has been paid by the appellant to him to pay into the Govt. treasury. On detailed perusal of the records, we do find that the appellant herein, in the statement recorded by the investigating authorities, has clearly recorded that he had given the amounts to Mr. Deepak Joshi who was the Consultant. It is also recorded that the appellant had insisted Mr. Deepak Joshi that they should pay the amount of service tax by cheque but Mr. Deepak Joshi, the Consultant, had convince .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the evidence available with the appellant to show that they had withdrawn the cash from the bank and given them to the said Mr. Deepak Joshi for discharging the service tax, the certificate produced today by the learned Counsel indicates that the cash book of the appellant during the period June 2006 to April 2009 indicates recording of an amount as payment of service tax. The said amounts were tallied by us with the amounts showing in paragraph 4 of the impugned order and the figures are ident .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has been done with the knowledge of the appellant herein. The fraudulent act of the Consultant seems to be driven by the greed of the Consultant to enrich himself. To our mind it cannot be attributable to the appellant as nothing is brought on record that the appellant had knowledge of such an activity undertaken by the Consultant. It is also not on record that the appellant had not paid any amount to the Consultant for the payment of service tax to the department. We find that the Consultant h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the Consultant as the Consultant has been appointed as an agent and reading of Section 238 of India Contract Act, he becomes liability on the action of the Consultant, will not carry the case of Revenue any further. As per the Indian Contract Act, the Section 238 talks about the vicarious liability only in the case if the principal is authorized an agent to do an act in the course of business for the principals. In the case in hand it is on record that the appellant had appointed an agent to d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version