Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Kalpit realty & services Limited Versus The I.T.O., Ward-4 (2) , Ahmedabad

2015 (10) TMI 1874 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Disallowance of advances given to transporters - whether it is provision and not actual written off in books of account though advances given during the normal course of business? - Held that:- It is an undisputed fact that during the year under consideration, the Assessee had debited a sum under the head “provision for bad debts” and had claimed it as deduction. It is also an undisputed fact that the amount were not written off in the books of accounts in the year under consideration. According .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct to allowing the deduction in subsequent years, Before us, ld. A.R. has submitted that the amount which were claimed as “provision for bad debts” were in fact have been written off in subsequent years and in subsequent year, when the same have been written off in A.Y. 08-09, Assessee has not claimed the deduction in A.Y. 08-09 and therefore Assessee should not be denied the claim altogether. The aforesaid submission of the Assessee needs a factual verification. We therefore restore the issue b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T(A)-VIII, Ahmedabad dated 01-07-2011 for A.Y. 2006-07. 2. The relevant facts as culled out from the material on record are as under. 3. Assessee is a company stated to be engaged in the business of transportation, construction and development. Assessee electronically filed its return of income for A.Y. 2006-07 on 28.12.2006 declaring total loss of ₹ 12,30,846/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and thereafter the assessment was framed under section 143(3) and the total loss was determin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

en off in books of account though advances given during the normal course of business. 4. During the course of assessment proceedings and on perusing the details furnished by the Assessee, A.O noticed that Assessee has debited a sum of ₹ 3,74,860/- under the head provisions for bad debts . Assessee was asked to justify its claim to which Assessee submitted that during the course of transport business, Assessee had given advances to the contractors for the expenses which was also a normal p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. He accordingly disallowed the claim of ₹ 3,74,860/-. Aggrieved by the order of A.O., Assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) who upheld the disallowance by holding as under:- 3.3 I have carefully considered the facts of the case, findings of the A.O as well as submission of the appellant. During the assessment proceedings, the A.O observed that the assessee has debited sum of ₹ 374860/- under the head 'Provisions for bad debts'. The A.O has disallowed the claim of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubmitted that the appellant is in the business of transportation. During the course of business of transportation , the appellant had to give the advances to the contractors at the beginning of the trip for on the way expenses. As per the normal practice of profession of transportation business, every time such type of advances given to the drivers. After completion of the trip or periodically, the concern contractor made the bills and accordingly the advances given are adjusted against the sum .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

" and it has not written off the advances in the books of account. Meaning thereby the advances have really not become bad during the year under consideration. It is settled legal position that any " provision with reference to debt or advances is not allowable unless it is written off in the books of account. Therefore the addition of ₹ 3,74,860/- is confirmed. 5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of ld. CIT(A), Assessee is now in appeal before us. 6. Before us, ld. A.R reiterate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted the sum as bad debts. The ld. A.R. placed on record the copy of the computation of income for A.Y. 2008-09, grouping of bad and doubtful debts and the audited accounts in her support. She further placed reliance on the decision of Ahmedabad Tribunal in the case of Perfect Equipments vs. DCIT 85 ITD 50 (Ahmedabad) for the proposition that the Hon ble Tribunal could give direction in relation to any assessment year which is not before it but is necessary for disposal of appeal. The ld. D.R. on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version