New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1904 - DELHI HIGH COURT

2015 (10) TMI 1904 - DELHI HIGH COURT - [2016] 380 ITR 197 - Settlement application - whether the petitioner in each of these petitions is a related party of the respective specified person under section 245C(1)(ia)? - Held that:- Admittedly, neither M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its directors individually or their relatives individually hold any substantial interest in the applicant companies. The finding of the Settlement Commission is that there is no shareholder having substantial .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

constitute substantial interest, then it would have specified so. Since the legislature has not provided for clubbing of the shareholding of different persons to determine substantial interest, the same cannot be considered. The fact that the legislature has catered for a situation of beneficial ownership of shares shows that the omission of clubbing of shareholding is not unintentional.

The alleged fact that four directors of the specified person (M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd.) hold 5 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spitals Ltd.)is of no avail. As elucidated hereinabove, under clause (a)(v), only if a director of the Petitioner companies had a substantial interest in the specified person (M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd.), then, the petitioner companies, their directors and relatives of their directors qualify as related parties. Under clause (a)(vi), the petitioner companies would qualify as related parties, if the specified person (M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd.) or any of its directors or any relative of any of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Advocate with Mr S.R.Wadhwa, Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni and Ms Kavita Jha, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan, Mr Akash Vajpai and Mr Zoheb Hussain, Advocates JUDGMENT Sanjeev Sachdeva, J 1. These 13 Writ Petitions arise out of a common Judgment dated 23.04.2014 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission), in a batch of 25 settlement applications filed under section 245C (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itions is whether the petitioner in each of these petitions is a related party of the respective specified person under section 245C(1)(ia) of the Act ? 3. Before adverting to the facts of each of the cases, it would be expedient to examine the provisions of section 245C of the Act to ascertain as to who qualifies as a related party in terms of clauses (a)(v) and (a)(vi)(B) of the Explanation to sub-section (1) to section 245C. Since the petitioners in these petitions claim themselves to be rela .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he additional amount of income-tax payable on such income and such other particulars as may be prescribed, to the Settlement Commission to have the case settled and any such application shall be disposed of in the manner hereinafter provided : Provided that no such application shall be made unless,- (i) in a case where proceedings for assessment or reassessment for any of the assessment years referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153A or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153A or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153B in case of the applicant, being a person referred to in section 153A or section 153C, have been initiated, the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds ten lakh rupees, (ii) in any other case, the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds ten lakh rupees, and such tax and the interest thereon, which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

idual, any relative of the specified person; (ii) where the specified person is a company, firm, association of persons or Hindu undivided family, any director of the company, partner of the firm, or member of the association or family, or any relative of such director, partner or member; (iii) any individual who has a substantial interest in the business or profession of the specified person, or any relative of such individual; (iv) a company, firm, association of persons or Hindu undivided fam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion or family or any relative of such director, partner or member; (vi) any person who carries on a business or profession,- (A) where the specified person being an individual, or any relative of such specified person, has a substantial interest in the business or profession of that person; or (B) where the specified person being a company, firm, association of persons or Hindu undivided family, or any director of such company, partner of such firm or member of the association or family, or any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y per cent of the voting power; and (B) in any other case, such person is, on the date of search, beneficially entitled to not less than twenty per cent of the profits of such business or profession. (1A) For the purposes of sub-section (1) of this section , the additional amount of income-tax payable in respect of the income disclosed in an application made under sub-section (1) of this section shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the provisions of sub-sections (1B) to (1D). (1B) W .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch aggregate were the total income. (1C) The additional amount of income-tax payable in respect of the income disclosed in the application relating to the previous year referred to in sub-section (1B) shall be,- (a) in a case referred to in clause (i) of that sub-section, the amount of tax calculated under that clause; (b) in a case referred to in clause (ii) of that sub-section, the amount of tax calculated under that clause as reduced by the amount of tax calculated on the total income returne .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct of the income disclosed in the application. (2) Every application made under sub-section (1) shall be accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed. (3) An application made under sub-section (1) shall not be allowed to be withdrawn by the applicant. (4) An assessee shall, on the date on which he makes an application under sub-section (1) to the Settlement Commission, also intimate the Assessing Officer in the prescribed manner of having made such application to the said Commission. (highlight .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

substantial interest in the business or profession of the specified person; or (iii) an association of persons, a member of which, has a substantial interest in the business or profession of the specified person; or (iv) a Hindu undivided family, a member of which, has a substantial interest in the business or profession of the specified person; or (v) any director, of such a company or (vi) any partner, of such a firm or (vii) any member, of such an association of persons; or (viii) any member, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i) the specified person (being a firm), that firm; or (iii) the specified person (being an association of persons), that association; or (iv) the specified person (being a Hindu undivided family), that family; or (v) any director of such specified person (company); or (vi) any partner of such specified person (firm); or (vii) any member of such specified person (association of persons); or (viii) any member of such specified person (Hindu undivided family); or (ix) any relative of such director .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted parties for the purposes of clause (ia) of the Proviso to sub-section 1 to section 245C of the Act. 7. So, under clause (a)(v), only if a director of the applicant company has a substantial interest in the specified person (company), then, the applicant company, its directors and relatives of its directors qualify as related parties. A company would not qualify as a related party merely because any relative of one of its directors has a substantial interest in the specified person. However, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Party (RP) Qualified Director of SP, or Director of RP - Relative of Director of SP Relative of Director of RP - (where signifies having a substantial interest) 9. We may also note that the Explanation uses the word means . It is trite to say that when in the definition clause given in any statute the word means is used, what follows is intended to speak exhaustively. When the word means is used in the definition, to borrow the words of Lord Esher, M.R. in Gough v. Gough [(1891) 2 QB 665 : 60 L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its scope would be extended to bring within it matters, which in its ordinary meaning may or may not comprise. Bharat Coop. Bank (Mumbai) Ltd. v. Employees Union, (2007) 4 SCC 685 at page 695 The words means and includes , on the other hand, indicate an exhaustive explanation of the meaning which, for the purposes of the Act, must invariably be attached to these words or expressions . (See : Dilworth v. Commissioner of Stamps [1899 AC 99, 105-106 : (1895-9) All ER Rep Ext 1576] (Lord Watson); M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it emerges that a person shall be deemed to have a substantial interest in a business or profession, where if, the business or profession is carried on by a company, then on the date of search, such person is the beneficial owner of shares (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend, whether with or without a right to participate in profits) carrying not less than twenty per cent of the voting power and in any other case, such person is, on the date of search, beneficially entitled to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e a related party to M/s Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. on the ground that both the companies are substantially controlled by the Srivastava and the Bhandari families and has common shareholding and directorship. It is also contended that more than 20% of the equity share capital of the specified person M/s Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. was held by Mrs. Mala Srivastava wife of Mr. Rajesh Srivastava a director of the petitioner. It claims to be covered by clause (a)(v) of the explanation. 14. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any Director of the applicant company should have substantial interest in the business of specified person. Holding of shares by the relatives of such Director either singly or jointly is of no significance. Accordingly, holding of more than 20% shares of M/s. Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. by Smt. Mata Srivastava and Smt. Sushmita Srivastava is of no significance. As no Director of the applicant, company holds any substantial interest in the business of M/s. Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd., it can .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ospitals Ltd. applicant is also not related to M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. Accordingly, it is held that M/s. Rockland Hotels Ltd. is not a related person either to Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. or to M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. (underlining supplied) 15. Holding a substantial interest in the specified person, by a director of the applicant, is a necessary qualifying condition. If the legislature had intended to enlarge the ambit of the qualifying condition by including a relative of the direct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

antial interest in the specified person M/s Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd.. Admittedly that is not the case and the said condition is not satisfied. None of the directors of M/s Rockland Hotels Ltd. hold substantial interest in M/s Somya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Merely because a relative of one of the directors of the applicant/petitioner is stated to be holding a substantial interest in the specified person would be of no avail. We do not find any infirmity with the reasoning of the Settlement Co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

care Pvt. Ltd.) WP(C) 3761/2014 (M/s. Aesthetica Enterprises Pvt Ltd.) 17. The Settlement Commission qua the petitioners hereinabove has held as under: The AR claims that clause (vi) of the Explanation is attracted in respect of these 9 companies. Examination of the explanation (a)(vi)(B) reveals that it is applicable to a person where the specified person being a company itself holds or any Director of such company holds or any relative of such Director holds a substantial interest in the busin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its Directors or their relative hold any substantial interest in the applicant company. Examination of the application of M/s. Radhika Surgical Pvt. Ltd. reveals that its total shareholding is of 18,72,500 shares, with M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. holding 18,62,500 shares which comes to 99% of shares. Thus, M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is the only shareholder having substantial interest in this company. Neither M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its directors .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pplicant company. Examination of the application of M/s. Hitesh Construction Pvt. Ltd. reveals that its total shareholding is of 4,44.847 shares, with M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. holding 4,34,847 shares which comes to 97% of shares. Thus, M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is the only shareholder having substantial interest in this company. Neither M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its Directors or their relative hold any substantial interest in the applicant company. Examination of the application of M/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

otal shareholding is of 15,57,500 shares, with M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. holding 15,47.500 shares which comes to 99% of shares. Thus. M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is the only shareholder having substantial interest in this company. Neither M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its Directors or their relative hold any substantial interest in the applicant company. Examination of the application of M/s. Kunal Medicare Pvt. Ltd. reveals that its total shareholding is of 20,04,250 shares, with M/s. Rockl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

99% of shares. .Thus, M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is the only shareholder having substantial interest in this company. Neither M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its directors or their relative hold any substantial interest in the applicant company. Examination of the application of M/s. Lipi Finstock Pvt. Ltd. reveals that its total shareholding is of 15,58,200 shares, with M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. holding 15,57,400 shares which comes to 99% of shares. Thus, M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is the only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y relative of Directors should hold substantial interest in the applicant company. The examination made above reveals that M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. does not hold any shares in these 9 companies. None of the Directors of M/S. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. hold any substantial interest in these 9 companies. None of the relatives of the directors of Rockland Hospitals Ltd. hold any substantial interest in these 9 companies. M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is neither a Director in M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fixed rate of dividend, whether with or without a right to participate in the profits), carrying not less than 20% of voting power, is deemed to have substantial interest. So the section envisages a situation where a shareholder has a right to participate in the profits and has voting power. It is only the equity shareholders who are normally entitled to voting power and participate in the profits. Such an equity shareholder may hold shares in his own name or in the name of his relatives or asso .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

est in the cases of 9 applicant companies also. These 3 Directors either do not have shareholdings in these 9 companies or their shareholding in less than 9%. Consequently, voting power of these Directors in 9 applicant companies is either zero or of a percentage less than 20%. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. is an independent company and exists on its own as a legal entity. The company is a legal person entirely, different from its shareholders even if there is only one shareholder. Rights and liabilities o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rofits of Rockland Pvt. Ltd., have no right of participation in profits of the companies in which Rockland Pvt. Ltd. has a substantial interest. Thus, the Directors of Rockland Hospitals neither participate in the profits of the above 9 applicant companies nor have any voting power in these companies. We are accordingly of the view that the definition of beneficial owner of the share in explanation (b) applies only to shares held in a company by a person either in his own name or in the name of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. hold practically the entire share capital of M/s. Rockland Pvt. Ltd. and therefore these 9 companies are related to Rockland Hospitals Ltd. is to be rejected as it is without any substance. The definition of related person has been provided in the Explanation (a) to proviso below section 245C(1). The words used are the applicant, in relation to specified person referred to in clause (ia), means". Thus, the definition provided in Explanation is a complete definit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the applicant company. Accordingly, conditions of clause (vi) are not satisfied. None of the Directors of these 9 companies holds substantial interest in M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd., a specified person. Accordingly, conditions of clause (v) of the Explanation are also not satisfied. Clause (i) and (iii) of Explanation are not applicable. Similarly, clauses (ii) and (iv) are also not applicable. Thus, under the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no relationship of these 9 companies wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

companies would not qualify as a related party merely because any relative of one of its directors has a substantial interest in the specified person. Further, the petitioner companies would qualify as a related party, if a specified person (company) or any of its directors or any relative of any of its directors have a substantial interest in the petitioner companies. 19. In the case of the abovementioned 9 petitioners clause (a)(vi) is stated to be applicable and they are stated to be related .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

only shareholder having substantial interest. Though, 3 directors of the specified person (M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd.) claim to have substantial interest in Rockland Pvt. Ltd. Individually, however, these 3 Directors either do not have shareholdings in the 9 petitioners or their shareholding is less than 9%. Consequently, these Directors do not have a substantial interest in either of the 9 petitioners. The plea that the directors of the specified person (M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd.) hold an in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of Explanation (b)(A). 20. Beneficial owner of the share as referred to in Explanation (b)(A) refers to shares held in a company by a person either in his own name or in the name of other, persons. A corporate entity is a separate legal entity. Merely because a director of the specified person holds shares in a company which in turn holds shares in the Petitioner would not make the director the beneficial holder of the shares of the Petitioner and thus qualify the petitioner as a related party .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in respect of these 3 companies. Examination of the explanation (a)(vi)(B) reveals that it is applicable to a person where the specified person being a company itself holds or any Director of such company holds or any relative of such Director holds a substantial interest in the business or profession of that person. In other words, first it is necessary to find out who are the persons who hold a substantial interest in the business of applicants. Examination of the application of M/s. Mona Inf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

holding have been filed with the settlement application. Examination of the shareholding details reveals that there is no shareholder having substantial interest in this company. Examination of the application of M/s. Umesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. reveals that the total shareholding of the company is of 7,40,625 shares 20% of shareholding comes to 1,48,125 shares. Examination of the shareholding details provided in the settlement application reveals that there is no shareholder having substant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in explanation (a)(vi)(B) are not satisfied. Accordingly, it cannot be held that the above 3 applicant companies are related to M/s. Rockland, Hospitals Ltd. The argument of AR that cumulative holding of the Directors of M/s. Rockland Hospitals in the above companies exceeds 20% and therefore they have substantial interest, cannot be accepted. The provisions of Explanation (a) very clearly define the relationship based on any Director or his relative having substantial interest. The provision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ons to decide whether they have substantial interest, the definition of substantial interest and also the definition of related person as provided in Explanation (a) and (b) would have suitably provided for it. The present definition is very clearly applicable only in respect of a person having a substantial interest. Two or more persons cumulatively having substantial interest cannot be read into the present definition. We accordingly find no merit in the argument that cumulative holding of Dir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e abovementioned 3 petitioners also clause (a)(vi) is stated to be applicable and they are stated to be related parties to M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd. Therefore the specified person (i.e. M/s Rockland Hospitals Ltd.) or any of its directors or any relative of any of its directors should have a substantial interest in the petitioner companies. Admittedly, neither M/s. Rockland Hospitals Ltd. nor any of its directors individually or their relatives individually hold any substantial interest in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version