Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1924 - KERLA HIGH COURT

2015 (10) TMI 1924 - KERLA HIGH COURT - TMI - Condonation of delay - No satisfactory explanation for condonation - Held that:- Order of the 2nd respondent, in the delay condonation application preferred by the petitioner, does not reflect a consideration of the facts relevant for consideration of the issue of condonation of delay in second appeal, under a statutory scheme of litigation. The parameters for exercise of discretion, in cases involving condonation of delay, have been laid down by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was negligent or callous in pursuing the matter before the Forum, and further, the delay was not so huge as would cause substantial prejudice or harm to the opposite side, the situation would normally call for a condonation of the delay. - 2nd respondent has not considered the application for condonation of delay filed by the appellant in accordance with the decisions laid down by the Supreme Court [2015 (1) TMI 1053 - SUPREME COURT]. Accordingly, I quash Exts.P17 and P18 orders and direct the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed an appeal against the order of the 1st respondent confirming an assessment for the assessment year 2010- 11. Inasmuch as there was a delay in filing the appeal before the 2nd respondent, the petitioner had also preferred petition for condonation of delay, supported by an affidavit giving an explanation for the delay occasioned. The 2nd respondent, on a consideration of the application for condonation of delay preferred by the petitioner, proceeded to hold that the petitioner had not satisf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ses involving condonation of delay, have been laid down by the Supreme Court in a number of decisions wherein it is stated that, normally when a claim made by an applicant is legally sustainable, the delay must be condoned. It is also mandated that, when substantial justice and technicalities are pitted against each other, then the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred. There are cases where the conduct of a party must also be gone into, and where it is established that the condu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

echnicalities. It would be instructive to refer to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and others - [JT 2013 (12) SC 450], where, at paragraphs 15 and 16, the court culled out the broad principles that should govern an application for condonation of delay. They read as follows: 15. From the aforesaid authorities the principles that can broadly be culled out are: i) There should be a liberal, pragmatic, justice- oriented, non .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rations should not be given undue and uncalled for emphasis. iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel or litigant is to be taken note of. v) Lack of bona fides imputable to a party seeking condonation of delay is a significant and relevant fact. vi) it is to kept in mind that adherence to strict proof should not affect public justice and cause public mischief because the courts are required to be vigilant so that in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ix) The conduct, behavior and attitude of a party relating to its inaction or negligence are relevant factors to be taken into consideration. It is so as the fundamental principle is that the courts are required to weigh the scale of balance of justice in respect of both parties and the said principle cannot be given a total go by in the name of liberal approach. x) If the explanation offered is concocted or the grounds urged in the application are fanciful, the courts should be vigilant not to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version