Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Jaipur Texweaving Park Ltd. Versus The I.T.O. Ward-7 (2) , Jaipur and Vica-Versa

2015 (10) TMI 2014 - ITAT JAIPUR

Interest earned by the appellant during pre operation period on the grant received from government of India - Held that:- Going through the serial No. 31 to 40 of the paper book and various copies of orders of Ministry of Textile about agreement of subsidy, which required to be considered before deciding the nature of interest income, therefore, we set aside this issue to the Assessing Officer and is directed to give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t had filed detailed information as to when the share capital was received and how the part of share capital was advanced to his sister concern on which no interest has been charged. Even in respect of credit transactions on account of sweep transfer in the bank account against which loan was advanced to M/s JTPL Texmart Pvt. Ltd. The ld CIT(A) has held that sweep transfer is the amount from FDRs, which were earlier got by the appellant when the requirement of funds was there for making such loa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

No. 256/JP/2014 - Dated:- 11-9-2015 - Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JM & SHRI T.R. MEENA, AM For The Assessee : Shri Mukesh Khandelwal (CA) For The Revenue : Shri Raj Mehra (JCIT ORDER PER: R.P. TOLANI, J.M. These are cross appeals one by the assessee and another by the department are against the order dated 28/01/2014 passed by the learned CIT(A)-III, Jaipu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in confirming the action of the ld A.O. whereby he has taxed the interest of ₹ 63,21,497/- earned by the appellant during pre operation period on the grant received from government of India. Grounds of revenue s appeal 1. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in restricting the addition made under the head income from other sources from ₹ 66,22,116/- to ₹ 63,21,497/- without considering the entries reflected in form 26AS. 2. The CIT(A) has further e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rmed to setup a Textile Weaving Park near Kishangarh. For this it was allotted a piece of land by RIICO and got grant of ₹ 23.23 crores from the Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India. The assessee company is to allot/sell the infrastructure in the said Textile Weaving Park to the concerns in the business of Textile Weaving. The ld Assessing Officer observed that the assessee maintained relevant records, books of account and supporting documents which were produced during the course of asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals Fertilizers Ltd. 227 ITR 172. The assessee replied vide letter dated 22/10/2012 which has been reproduced by the Assessing Officer on page 2-3 of the assessment order. The ld Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation filed by the assessee and after considering the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Bokaro Steel 236 ITR 315 (SC) and Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals Fertilizers Ltd. (supra) treated the interest income as income fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eting of the Central Govt. about treatment of interest earned on grant amount, clarification issued by IFSL on the settled term of the Central Govt. The ld CIT(A) held that the additional evidence can be admitted in case of condition laid down under Clause a to d of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (in short the Rules). These evidences were asked to give comment by the Assessing Officer, the ld CIT(A) after considering the comment on additional evidence, has held that assessment in this ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee before completion of assessment. The ld Assessing Officer had given proper opportunity of being heard as also that in spite of such opportunities during the assessment proceedings, such documents were not furnished. The assessee has not raised this issue before the Assessing Officer at the time of assessment proceedings that the interest amount being of capital nature is to be reduced from subsidy received and accordingly interest earned on such FDRs should not be taxed. There is no suf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lments and that such amount was kept by way of FDRs in the bank on which such interest income was earned and that making of FDRs was not at all due to any compelling circumstances which may have been imposed by the Govt. of India and that in such circumstances, such interest income is to be taxed as income from other sources. It is a settled law that the interest income from FDRs before commencing of business would ways be taxed as income from other sources. He further relied on the following de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

revenue are in appeals before us. The ld AR has submitted that the additional evidence filed by the assessee had not been adjudicated/admitted under Rule 46A of the Rules. These evidences were not available with the assessee at the time of assessment order even they were dated before the date of assessment order. These evidences are going to root of the ground, therefore, same are required to be admitted as Govt. of India has granted subsidy to the appellant and imposed certain restrictions on i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is income from other sources as held by the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra), therefore, order of the ld CIT(A) may please be confirmed. However, the ld CIT(A) has reduced interest income from ₹ 66,22,116/- to ₹ 63,21,497/- without giving any opportunity to the Assessing Officer, therefore, the interest income is to be assessed at ₹ 66,22,116/-. 6. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

equired details. Accordingly, we set aside this issue to the Assessing Officer for de novo. Hence, ground No. 1 and 2 of the assessee s appeal and ground No. 2 of the revenue s appeal are allowed for statistical purposes only. 7. The second ground of the revenue s appeal is against granting of relief of ₹ 11,67,000/- of interest disallowed against interest free loan given to the related concern. The ld DR supported that the assessee had advances of ₹ 97.25 lacs to M/s JTPL Texmart Pv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the textile park at Kishangarh. The assessee also stated that the loan extended to M/s JTPL Texmart Pvt. Ltd. was utilized for buying of shares in the assessee s company and because of this reason, the loan was granted without any interest. No nexus has been established by the Assessing Officer that interest bearing fund was diverted for advancing money to the sister company, therefore, charging of interest @ 12% on such fund of ₹ 97,25,000/- advanced to sister concern is without any basi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e record. The ld CIT(A) has thoroughly examined this issue on facts as well as on legal side of the case. The appellant had filed detailed information as to when the share capital was received and how the part of share capital was advanced to his sister concern on which no interest has been charged. Even in respect of credit transactions on account of sweep transfer in the bank account against which loan was advanced to M/s JTPL Texmart Pvt. Ltd. The ld CIT(A) has held that sweep transfer is the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Therefore, we uphold the order of the ld CIT(A) on this ground. Accordingly, revenue s appeal on this ground is dismissed. 7. In the result, the assessee appeal is allowed for statistical purposes only and revenue s appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 11/09/2015.

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d= false Priority= 9 QFormat= true Name= heading 6 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on Locked= false Priority= 1 Name= Default Paragraph Font />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ight Grid />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Priority= 72 SemiHidden= false UnhideWhenUsed= false Name= Colorful List />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alse UnhideWhenUsed= false QFormat= true Name= List Paragraph />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Locked= false Priority= 72 SemiHidden= false UnhideWhenUsed= false Name= Colorful List Accent 1 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m List 2 Accent 2 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

UnhideWhenUsed= false Name= Light List Accent 3 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alse Priority= 70 SemiHidden= false UnhideWhenUsed= false Name= Dark List Accent 3 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent 4 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sed= false Name= Colorful Grid Accent 4 /> .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y= 68 SemiHidden= false UnhideWhenUsed= false Name= Medium Grid 2 Accent 5 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eption Locked= false Priority= 63 SemiHidden= false UnhideWhenUsed= false Name= Medium Shading 1 Accent 6 />

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version