Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Ashok Kapasiawala Versus The ITO Ward-7 (1) , Surat

2015 (10) TMI 2045 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Entitlement to exemption u/s.54F - Held that:- In the present case, the assessee purchased new asset on 05/10/2009 and had transferred the original asset on 8/01/2008. As per Section 54F (1) of the Act, the exemption would be available if the assessee purchased the residential house within two years after the date when transfer took place. As per the judgment of K. Ramachandra Rao case [2015 (4) TMI 620 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] the provisions of section 54F(4) would not be attracted in the event .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Therefore, respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs K.Ramachandra Rao (supra), we hereby set aside the impugned order and direct the AO to re-compute the assessed income after granting the benefit of section 54F of the Act to the assessee. - Decided partly in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - I.T.A. No. 2692/Ahd/2014 - Dated:- 10-9-2015 - SHRI G.D. AGARWAL,VICE PRESIDENT (AZ) And SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The App .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ption u/s.54F. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A s) erred in not appreciating that the investment in residential property was made before the expiry of 2 years from the relevant date. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A s) erred in not considering the latest decision on the above issue. Notice u/s.148 issued after the limitation period 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A s) erred in conf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2. In response to the notice, the assessee filed return of income on 30/04/2012 received by the Assessing Officer (AO in short) on 01/05/2012. Subsequently, the AO framed assessment u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act vide order dated 30/03/2013; thereby the AO made addition of ₹ 28,07,078/- on account of Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) as discussed in para-2 of assessment order, addition on account of unexplained investment in mutual funds of ₹ 2,40,000/- and addition towards undisclosed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he limitation period 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A s) erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer with regard to reopening of assessment as being barred by limitation. 3.1. The ld.counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld.CIT(A) failed to appreciate the fact that the reopening of the assessment was bad by limitation. 3.2. On the contrary, Sr.DR submitted that this argument of the assessee is misplaced and he submitted that no such ground .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reopening is barred by time. As per section 149 of the Act, no notice u/s.148 can be issued for relevant assessment year, if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless he case falls under clause (b). If four years, but not more than six years, have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year unless the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to one lakh rupees or more for that year. In the case in hand, it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uch act of the AO was confirmed by the ld.CIT(A). The ld.counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee had sold office for ₹ 36 lacs on 08/01/2008. And had invested ₹ 1,06,00,000/- in residential property on 05/10/2009. The authorities below have grossly erred in not giving the benefit of section 54F of the Act. In support of the contention, ld.counsel for the assessee placed reliance on various case-laws enclosed with the paperbook of the assessee (at page Nos.3 to 19); inclu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the claim of deduction u/s.54F of the Act. 6. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below as well as the case-law relied upon by the ld.counsel for the assessee. The only question which needs to be decided is whether the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s.54F of the Act under the facts and circumstances of the present case. Before adverting to the rival contentions, it would be appropriate for the sake of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inal asset), and the assessee has, within a period of one year before or [two years] after the date on which the transfer took place purchased, or has within a period of three years after that date [constructed, one residential house in India] (hereinafter in this section referred to as the new asset), the capital gain shall be dealt with in accordance with the following provisions of this section, that is to say,- (a) if the cost of the new asset is not less than the net consideration in respec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

residential house, other than the new asset, on the date of transfer of the original asset; or (ii) purchases any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of one year after the date of transfer of the original asset; or (iii) constructs any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of three years after the date of transfer of the original asset; and (b) the income from such residential house, other than the one residential house owned on the date of transf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of [two years] after the date of the transfer of the original asset, or constructs, within the period of three years after such date, any residential house, the income from which is chargeable under the head "Income from house property" , other than the new asset, the amount of capital gain arising from the transfer of the original asset not charged under section 45 on the basis of the cost of such new asset as provided in clause (a), or, as the case may be, clause (b), of sub-section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vided in clause (a) or, as the case may be, clause (b), of sub-section (1), shall be deemed to be income chargeable under the head "Capital gains" relating to long-term capital assets of the previous year in which such new asset is transferred.] [(4) The amount of the net consideration which is not appropriated by the assessee towards the purchase of the new asset made within one year before the date on which the transfer of the original asset took place, or which is not utilised by hi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay, by notification in the Official Gazette, frame in this behalf and such return shall be accompanied by proof of such deposit; and, for the purposes of sub-section (1), the amount, if any, already utilised by the assessee for the purchase or construction of the new asset together with the amount so deposited shall be deemed to be the cost of the new asset: Provided that if the amount deposited under this sub-section is not utilised wholly or partly for the purchase or construction of the new a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in sub-section (1) been the cost of the new asset, shall be charged under section 45 as income of the previous year in which the period of three years from the date of the transfer of the original asset expires ; and (ii) the assessee shall be entitled to withdraw the unutilised amount in accordance with the scheme aforesaid. 6.1. A combined reading of section 54F(1) and 54F(4) of the Act, it is evident that the assessee would be entitled for exemption/deduction u/s.54F of the Act in the event h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in a specified capital gain account before the due date of filing of return u/d.193(1) of the Act. The question which is required to be examined whether the assessee has utilized the amount before the time limit prescribed for such purpose or if not whether the amount was deposited in the manner prescribed u/s.54F(4) In the present case, the undisputed facts are that the original asset was transferred on and the new asset was purchased on 05/10/2009. The assessee had not filed income-tax retu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e relied on the judgement of Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Jagtar Singh Chawla and judgement of Hon ble Karnataka High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. K. Ramachandra Rao. The Hon ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana held as under:- In the case of Fathima Bai vs. ITO, ITA No.435 of 2004 it was held that the extended due date u/s. 139(4) would be 31.3.1990. The assessee did not file the return within the extended due date. However, the assessee had .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

held to be an untenable contention. In the present case, the assessee had proved the payment of substantial amount of sale consideration for purchase of a residential property on or before 31.3.2008, that was within extended period of limitation of filing of return. Only a sum of ₹ 24 lacs was paid out of total sale consideration on 23.4.2008, though possession was delivered to the assessee on execution of the power of attorney on 30.3.2008. Since the assessee, has acquired a residential .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ransfer. Could he be denied exemption under section 54 F on the ground that he did not deposit the said amount in capital gain account scheme before the due date prescribed u/s.139(1) of the Act. The Hon ble High Court of Karnataka High Court held as under:- As it clear from Sub-section (4) in the event of the assessee not investing the capital gains either in purchasing the residential house or in constructing a residential house within the period stipulated in Section 54F(1), if the assessee w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version