Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Seminis Vegetable Seeds (I) Pvt Ltd Versus DCIT RG 8 (2) , Mumbai

Disallowance of R&D expenses in respect of product adaptability and demonstration expenses - Held that:- The issue of R&D expenses are recurring in nature and are incurred on yearly basis. Similar nature of expenditure have been allowed from the stage of the Tribunal and also by the Assessing Officer in pursuant of the finding given in earlier years. As stated in assessee’s line of business R & D expenses are continuous process without which assessee cannot carry out its business. Hence such a R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nue expenditure by the assessee, sum of ₹ 55 lakhs has been held to be ‘capital expenditure’ on which depreciation has been allowed, then for the balance amount of ₹ 19,85,707/- also on the same reasoning it has to be held as ‘capital expenditure’, on which the assessee should be liable for depreciation u/s 32. Such a claim cannot be disallowed merely on the ground that assessee had not deducted TDS and therefore is to be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia). Such a direction of the DRP cannot b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g of the DRP. Accordingly, on these facts we hold that depreciation should be allowed on the balance amount of ₹ 19,85,707/- also as has been done/allowed for the sum of ₹ 55 lakhs.- Decided in favour of assessee.

Transfer pricing adjustment - international transaction of import of seeds made by the assessee from its AE - adoption of MAP - Held that:- The entire transfer pricing adjustment has been made after rejecting the assessee’s method of benchmarking the transaction; .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer to adopt RPM as most appropriate method for benchmarking the transaction of import of seeds to its AE and carry out comparability analysis for benchmarking the assessee’s gross margin and determined the appropriate ALP.

Addition on account of fall in gross profit margin - Held that:- there are exceptional items in this year like inventory written off aggregating to ₹ 16,36,68,410/- and extra ordinary increase in sales expenses at ₹ 6,12,55,579/-. If these .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h the contention of the Ld. DR that if the TP adjustments are deleted, then there would be no telescoping and the entire addition made on account of fall in gross margin will get sustained. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer that in case the TP adjustments are deleted after adopting the RPM as MAM, then the entire GP addition should be sustained. - ITA No. : 365/Mum/2012 - Dated:- 16-9-2015 - SHRI G S PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBERITA For The Appellant : .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ejecting the books of account, trading results and thereby making the best judgment assessment u/s 144; (ii) The Ld. Assessing Officer has erred in law and on facts in disallowing R&D expenses in respect of product adaptability and demonstration expenses for sums aggregating to ₹ 74,40,373/-; (iii) The Ld. Assessing Officer has erred in law and on facts in not granting depreciation u/s 32 in respect of compensation received which has been treated as capital expenditure; (iv) The Ld Ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

argest vegetable seeds company and offers several distinct hybrid seeds. As against the return of loss of ₹ 22,67,56,028/-, the assessment in the case of the assessee was completed at a loss of ₹ 29,76,983/- after making the various additions/disallowances, including transfer pricing adjustment of ₹ 15,40,31,031/-. 3. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, Shri Rajan Vora submitted that, so far as the issue relating to disallowance of product adaptability and demonstr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re on R&D on the ground that no details were furnished. He further submitted that the details of product adaptability and demonstration expenses are appearing at page 148 of the paper book, which were there before the Assessing Officer as well as DRP, are as under: Sr. No. Depreciation Amount of Rs. 1 Production Department 35,15,768 2 Quality Department 1,94,184 3 Research & Development Department 21,42,066 4 Research & Development Foundation Seeds 6,08,301 5 Research & Developme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e to all climatic zones of India. For these purpose continued R & D expenses are incurred on yearly basis and are recurring in nature. Similar issue has come for consideration before the Tribunal in AY 2003-04 and in AY 2006- 07 which was decided in favour of the assessee. In the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal had set aside this issue following the directions of the DRP. In pursuance thereof, the Assessing Officer has allowed these expenditures in all the earlier years this issue stan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penses are recurring in nature and are incurred on yearly basis. Similar nature of expenditure have been allowed from the stage of the Tribunal and also by the Assessing Officer in pursuant of the finding given in earlier years. As stated by Ld. Counsel, in assessee s line of business R & D expenses are continuous process without which assessee cannot carry out its business. Hence such a R & D expenses need to be allowed under section 35D. As regard details of expenses, these are already .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay Seeds for termination of agreement dated 13.10.2006. The Assessing Officer has treated the entire expenditure as capital in nature and did not allow the assessee s claim for revenue expenditure. The DRP has upheld the action of the Assessing Officer and treated the compensation paid as capital in nature. However, the DRP directed the Assessing Officer to grant depreciation on the amount of ₹ 55,00,004/- on which tax was deducted at source. In respect of the balance payment amounting to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

also depreciation should be allowed on such a capital expenditure. The Ld. DR on the other hand, strongly relied upon the order of the DRP. 7. After considering the relevant observation and the finding of the DRP and also the submissions made by the parties, we find that, if out of the total claim of expenditure of ₹ 74,85,711/-, which was claimed as revenue expenditure by the assessee, sum of ₹ 55 lakhs has been held to be capital expenditure on which depreciation has been allowed, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is claiming revenue expenditure and not where it has been held to be disallowable as capital expenditure and secondly, if provision of 40(a)(ia) is to be invoked then the entire expenditure has to be first treated as revenue expenditure and then it has to be examined, whether it attracts TDS provisions. Thus, there is inherent inconsistency in the finding of the DRP. Accordingly, on these facts we hold that depreciation should be allowed on the balance amount of ₹ 19,85,707/- also as has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ofit Level Indicator (PLI) and identified eight comparables for benchmarking the Arm s Length Price of the assessee. The assessee s gross margin was (-) 44.57% whereas, the arithmetic mean of gross margins of the comparables based on single year data was (-) 29.93%. The Transfer Pricing Officer however has disregarded the assessee s Transfer Pricing Analysis by rejecting the RPM method and instead adopted TNMM on entity level as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM). Thereafter, the TPO, took three .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

PLI (OP/OI) is at - 12.44%. The comparable companies along with their PLI are as under :- Sr. No. Name of comparable PLI for FY 2006-07 (OP/OI) 1 Gujarat State Seeds Corpn. Ltd. 8.77% 2 Kaveri Seed Co. Ltd.* 23.86% 3 Syngenta India Ltd. 27.80% 4 Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. NA Arithmetic Mean 20.14% Assessee -12.44% Thus, from the above table, it can be seen that the PLI of the assessee is significantly less compared to PLI of the 3 comparables. Therefore, this transaction is benchmarked by takin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9. Shri Rajan Vora, submitted that, so far as the TP adjustments are concerned, similar issue was also involved in the earlier years, wherein similar TP adjustment has been deleted from the stage of the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide order dated 13th May, 2011 for the assessment year 2006-07 has directed the TPO to consider RPM as the most appropriate method for benchmarking the international transaction of import of seeds and then carry out TP and comparability analysis. In pursuance thereof, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ase of the assessee, a huge addition on account of gross profit was made by the Assessing Officer after rejecting the books of account, in the draft assessment order. The assessee before the DRP had written a letter dated 27.09.2011 stating that if G.P. additions are to be sustained then transfer pricing adjustment should be telescoped in such GP additions. Accordingly, the DRP has given direction to the Assessing Officer, that no separate TP addition of ₹ 15,40,31,031/- should be made in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be required to be made. On the issue of GP addition also, Mr. Vora made his detail submissions as to why on the facts of the assessee s case no addition is called for. 11. On the other hand, the Ld. DR submitted that, once the assessee itself has given a letter to the DRP agreeing for TP adjustment, to be telescoped from the addition of gross profit which the DRP has agreed, then assessee cannot backtrack from such an offer and plead that such an adjustment should be deleted. In any case, he sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ethod of TNMM by the department has been found to be inappropriate by the Tribunal in the earlier years and assessee s RPM has been accepted. As a result of adopting RPM as MAM, similar adjustments made in the earlier assessment years stands deleted. Thus, as a matter of judicial precedence and without there being any change of material facts and circumstances, we also direct the TPO/Assessing Officer to adopt RPM as most appropriate method for benchmarking the transaction of import of seeds to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch an addition will get enhanced. On the merits of the addition made on account of gross profit margin, it is seen from the records that the Assessing Officer has rejected the books of account mainly on the ground that assessee s GP margin is very low in this year as compared to previous year G.P. rate of 46.47% and secondly, the assessee could not produce the relevant records on the ground that the record maintained at the assessee s office at Aurangabad were washed away due to very heavy rain .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version