Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs (Appeals) - Vadodara – ii Versus Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd.

Valuation of goods - whether the amortized value of Tonner/Cylinder supplied to the respondent free of charge by the customer for filling the Liquid Chlorine manufactured by the respondent, is to be included in assessable value of goods Liquid Chorine cleared by the respondent to the customers. - Held that:- Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order had observed that the respondent while clearing Liquid chlorine manufactured by them to their customers in the tonners/cylinders supplied by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

[2009 (7) TMI 155 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] . In the case of TCP Ltd (2007 (7) TMI 199 - CESTAT, CHENNAI) the issue involved is the inclusion of the packing charges in the assessable value of the cylinder supplied by the buyers, which is similar to in the present appeal. - No reason to interfere the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals). - Decided against Revenue. - Appeal No. : E/1073,1080,1108/2007 - Order No. A/11246-11248/2015 - Dated:- 18-8-2015 - Mr. P.K. Das, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P.M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lling the Liquid Chlorine manufactured by the respondent, is to be included in assessable value of goods Liquid Chorine cleared by the respondent to the customers. 3. The Learned Authorised Representative on behalf of the Revenue fairly submits that the Commissioner (Appeals) proceeded on the basis of the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Grasim Industries Ltd Vs CCE, Indore 2004(164) ELT.257(Tri.). It is submitted that Revenue filed appeal before the Honble Supreme Court against the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssue, the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Indore Vs Grasim Industries Ltd - 2014(304)ELT.310 (Tri.Del), dismissed the appeal filed by Revenue. It is further submitted that on the identical issue, this Bench in the case of M/s Transpek Industries Ltd Vs CCE Vadodara - A/1382/WZB/AHD/2012 dtd 4.9.2012 following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of TCP Ltd Vs CC Madurai - 2008(227) ELT.109 (Tri.Chennai) allowed the appeal of the assessee. 5. On perusal of the grounds of appeal filed by the Reve .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he buyer, but is by the assessee himself. 6. The Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order had observed that the respondent while clearing Liquid chlorine manufactured by them to their customers in the tonners/cylinders supplied by the later and there is no allegations/findings that the conditions laid down under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act 1944 had not been satisfied. Hence, that the ground taken by the Revenue in the appeal can not be sustained. The revenue also not placed an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ical issue has been decided finally by the co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of TCP Limited Vs CCE Madurai 2008 (227) ELT 109 (Tri-Chennai), the ratio of which we respectfully produce below:- The appellants are manufacturers of liquid Sulphur dioxide and other chemicals. During the period of dispute [November 2004 - August 2005], they cleared liquid Sulphur di-oxide in cylinders supplied by buyers, on payment of duty on the basis of transaction value. The department wanted the amorti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

period in the case of Grasim Industries v. CCE, Indore - 2004 (164) E.L.T. 257 (Tri. Del.). In that case, the excisable commodity was liquid chlorine which was sold by the assessee in tonners supplied by buyers. The buyers were not related to the assessee, nor had the Revenue a case that the price was not the sole consideration for the sale. On these facts, no amount attributable to the value of the tonners was held to be includible in the assessable value of the excisable goods. We have not fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version