TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 2193X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der dated 05.09.2006 is set aside and earlier order dated 22.11.2005 is restored – Rectification limited to redemption fine. - Civil Appeal No. 1169/2007 - - - Dated:- 24-9-2015 - Mr. A.K. Sikri And Mr. Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG., Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. A. K. Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Pratik, Adv. And Mr. B. Krish ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by this Court wherein the appeal of the Revenue/Customs Authorities was allowed and it was held that the respondent herein is liable to pay the penalty. The matter in that respect was remitted back to the CESTAT to dispose of the appeal on its own merits. Operative portion of the order reads as under:- 34. We find that reference was made by departmental authorities to the proviso appended to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n of limitation. That being so we find no substance in the plea of learned counsel for the respondents that the action taken by authorities was beyond the period of limitation. Even otherwise, the proviso to subsection (2) of Section 28 is clearly applicable as the materials clearly indicate non levy and short levy on account of misrepresentation of facts by the respondents. On remand, the C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
