Home List
← Previous	Next →

M/s Ceebuild Co Pvt Ltd, Shri Sanjiv Kabra Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia

2015 (10) TMI 2269 - CESTAT KOLKATA

Waiver of pre deposit - revenue contended that applicant was not a manufacturer of the goods supplied to the power corporations but got it manufactured from various job workers. - Imposition of penalty - Held that:- Issues involved in the present cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

offer to deposit further ₹ 20.00 Lakhs seems to be reasonable at this stage. Consequently, the appellant (1) M/s. Ceebuild Co. Pvt. Ltd. is directed to deposit ₹ 20.00 Lakhs within a period of eight weeks and report compliance on 26/10/20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

os. 801 & 802/2012, 808/2012, In Excise Appeal Nos. E/484/2012, 480 & 481/2012 - Dated:- 20-8-2015 - D M Misra, Member (J) And H K Thakur, Member (T) For the Petitioner : Sri B N Chattopadhyay, Consultant & Sri Arijit Chakraborty, Adv. For the Re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ri Sanjiv Kabra (Appeal No. 481/12) and ₹ 10,000/- penalty under Rule 25 (1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 (Appeal No. 484/12). 2. The Ld. Consultant Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, assisted by Ld. Advocate Shri Arijit Chakraborty submitted that the d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the applicant had declared themselves as manufacturer with an intention to qualify for the tenders. It is the contention of the Ld. Advocate that the applicant was not a manufacturer of the goods supplied to the power corporations but got it manufa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

20/07/2015 in the case of M/s. S.A. Enterprise and others Vs. CCE, Kolkata-II. Further, he submits that during the course of adjudication, they have already deposited an amount of ₹ 5.00 Lakhs. On the instruction of their client, he offers to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and perused the records. Prima facie, we find that the issues involved in the present case are more or less comparable to the facts and circumstances involved in M/s. S.A. Enterprise case (supra). In these circumstances, considering that the applica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X