Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s R.R. Kobler Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC, ICD, Tuglakabad, New Delhi

2015 (10) TMI 2391 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Export of Leather Pouches - 100% EOU - Reimported goods under Notification No. 158/95-Cus - Appellant contended that reimport was within 3 years from date of report and delay of a few months is well within Commissioner's power to condone - Held That:- Condition No. II of Notification No. 158 / 1995-Cus. required that goods be re-exported from date of importation within 6 months of date of re-importation or such extended period not exceeding a further period of six months as Commissioner may allo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

K. Singh: Appeal has been filed against order-in-appeal dated 15.10.2009 which upheld the order-in-original dated 19.08.2009 in terms of which it was ordered that the duty be charged on goods imported vide Bill of Entry No. 505835 dated 28.03.2008 along with interest at applicable rate. The importer was directed to pay duty along with interest within seven days of the order-in-original failing which the Bank Guarantee was to be enforced. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are as under: The appellan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g a further period of six months as the Commissioner of Customs may allow; iii) The Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs is satisfied as regards identity of the goods; iv) The importers at the time of importation executes a bond undertaking to:- a) Export the goods after repairs or reconditioning within the period as stipulated; b) Pay, on demand, in the event of his failure to comply with any of the aforesaid conditions, an amount equal to the difference between t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l within the power of the Commissioner to condone as Commissioner had power to extend the six months period for re-export by a further period of six months. The appellant cited the judgment in the case of Teletube Electronics Ltd. vs. CC, ICD, TKD, New Delhi 2009 (240) ELT 710 (Tri. Del.) and Government of India decision in the case of Harison Chemicals 2006 (200) ELT 171 (G.O.I.) in this regard. 4. We have considered the contentions of the appellant. There is no dispute that the goods were re-i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version