Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Amar Sparklers Factory Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, C.C. III, Madurai

2015 (11) TMI 11 - ITAT CHENNAI

Difference between sales tax order and the sales made to the total income of the assessee - assessee submitted that there was difference in turnover disclosed to the sales tax department and the turnover disclosed to the Income tax department on account of inclusion of Mahamai, handling charges and transit insurance and if the above items are excluded, there will be no difference of turnover disclosed to the sales tax department and the income tax department - Held that:- The assessee has not pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s.1308 & 1309/Mds/2015 - Dated:- 2-9-2015 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri. V. Rajasekaran, C.A. For The Respondent : Shri. A.B. Koli, IRS, JCIT. ORDER These appeals by the assessee are directed against common order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai, dated 24.02.2015 for the above assessment years. Since the issue involved in these appeals are common in nature, these appeals are combined, heard together, and disposed of by this order for th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the Act in the case of M/s. Amar Sparklers Factory and its partners on 21.10.2008. Books of accounts, documents and other materials relating to the assessee and the group concerns were found and seized. Subsequently, relevant statutory notices were issued. The assessee filed return of incomes for the AY 2004-05 and 2005-06 admitting E4,58,860/- and E6,39,634/ - respectively on 23.12.2009. During the course of assessment proceedings, it was found out that the sales turnover as per Sales tax Ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 4. On appeal, The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) observed that the contention of the assessee are found to be apparently not correct and against the uncontrolled fact recorded in the assessment order. The Assessing Officer in the assessment order for the assessment year 2004-05 has observed that the sales as per Sales Tax Order is ₹ 79,60,649/- whereas the assessee firm had admitted E76,74,894/- as sales inclu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version