Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 32 - CESTAT BANGALORE

2015 (11) TMI 32 - CESTAT BANGALORE - 2015 (330) E.L.T. 697 (Tri. - Bang.) - Confiscation of gold bars - Six bars recovered concealed in shoes and pant pockets - Foreign currency and Indian currency also found - Penalty imposed under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 - Revenue contends that passengers were intercepted after they crossed green channel thus claim of appellants that they have not crossed Customs barriers is not correct - Total quantity brought by them is much more than .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

no reason to allow redemption on payment of fine under facts and circumstances - Penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 114AA is harsh - Because of seizure of gold and confiscation thereafter it cannot be said short levy has taken place - Penalties set aside - Decided partially in favour of Revenue. - C/21873/2014-DB, C/21874/2014-DB, C/21875/2014-DB, C/22869/2014-DB, C/22868/2014-DB, C/22870/2014-DB - Final Order Nos. 21348 - 21353 / 2015 - Dated:- 16-7-2015 - Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Judicia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assed through the green channel. The disembarkation slips of the passengers were verified and it was found that column No. 6, in which the passengers are required to declare total value of the goods they carry, was blank. Thereafter search of the passengers was conducted and from each of the appellant, six gold bars weighing 01 Kg. each were recovered. According to the Order-in-Original, the gold bars were found concealed in shoes and pant pockets to avoid detection by the authorities. Some fore .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pellants. The submissions in brief are as under : The three appellants are friends and are doing business independently and men of means contrary to the statements recorded at the time of seizure. All of them filed Income Tax Returns and copy of the returns were also filed. Shri Haji Mohamed, the third appellant wanted to start a hotel project in Kumbakonam, Tamilnadu and for the purpose of investment for the hotel, they purchased gold bars to sell in India. The appellants were guided by website .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

before they had an opportunity to declare the gold; they had sufficient money to pay all the duty; the seizure was effected in the Customs hall and therefore, import was not complete at all; since they had not crossed the Customs barrier, there was no offence committed; it is preemptive seizure and the appellants relied upon case law holding that seizure cannot be effected before the goods cross the Customs barrier. It was submitted that the appellants parents were citizens of India and therefor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the observations of the Commissioner in the order that the appellants had visited India and therefore they are not eligible for the benefit is wrong since their visit was less than 30 days in the case of two passengers; it was also observed by the Commissioner that the appellants did not show any evidence to show that they did not avail exemption earlier; according to the instructions issued, it was for the department to verify whether the appellant had availed the benefit or not; gold is n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s not been cross examined. Therefore, Mahazar has to be accepted as depicting true picture of what happened. According to the Mahazar, the passengers were intercepted after they crossed the green channel. Therefore, the claim of the appellants that they have not crossed the Customs barriers is not at all correct. He also submits that even if it was accepted that the passengers are of Indian origin, yet, total quantity brought by them is much more than the admissible quantity and therefore confis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ross examination of the Mahazar with witness, it is not possible to accept the claim of the appellants that they were intercepted in the Customs hall and had not crossed the Customs barriers and importation was not complete. In any case, it has been clearly brought on record that in the disembarkation slip/card filed by the appellants, they had mentioned value of the imported goods as nil. True declaration could have been made in the disembarkation card in which case, no case could have been mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and therefore, the facts as brought out by the Revenue have to be accepted and it is not possible to take a contrary view. 6. Once it is held to be not importable, e gold becomes a prohibited item and therefore, the Commissioner has the power to confiscate the same absolutely. He has a choice to give an option to redeem on payment of fine but the claim of the appellants that he must release the gold on payment of fine is not correct legal position. The decision of the Commissioner of Customs (A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion policy and repeal of Gold Control order weighed with the Tribunal - Tribunal ought to have considered whether he could have carried the gold as part of his baggage as an eligible passenger - Goods imported in violation of Import (Control) Order, 1955 read with Section 3(i) of Import and Export Control Act, 1947 - Concealment weighted with the Commissioner to order absolute confiscation - Commissioner s order upheld - Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962. This judgement was upheld by the Hon ble .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

esident in India. However no evidence to show that the appellants or their parents or grand parents or grand grand parents are Indian residents have been produced before us. All of the three appellants are holders of Singapore passport and therefore unless evidence is produced to show that their parents or grand parents are Indian origin, it is not possible to accept the statement that they have to be treated as person of Indian origin. In any case, we have already observed that even if a person .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ete or partial, it includes restriction which is one type of prohibition. This judgement was reaffirmed in the case of Om Prakash Bhatia Vs. Commissioner [2003 (155) E.L.T. 423 (S.C.)]. In the case of Garg Wollen Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Addl. Collector of Customs New Delhi [1998 (104) E.L.T. 306], the Honble Supreme Court held that absolute confiscation of goods is justified when it is not a fit case to exercise discretion to give option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation. 8. In view of the above d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version