Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur Versus M/s. Top Security Ltd

Levy of penalty - delay in payment of service tax Revenue contends that setting aside penalty under Sec. 78 is not justified as case involves collection of service tax and non-payment to Government - Held That:- Declaration of liability in ST3 returns shows that assessee is duty bound and undertook to discharge service tax liability and whatever demand raised in SCN was paid alongwith interest Commissioner (Appeals) has taken all aspects into consideration and passed the order No infirmity .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he demand of service tax of ₹ 22,93,525/-, allowed Cenvat credit of ₹ 10,932/- and waived the penalties under Section 76 and 78 by invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 and also waived penalty imposed under section 77(2) on Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda, Managing Director of the Respondents Company. 2. The facts of the case are that the Respondent Company is engaged in providing Security Agency Service and liable to pay service tax for which they are registered with Central Excise de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2.10.2009 was issued to the company as well as to Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda, Managing Director of the Respondents Company. In the adjudication, the adjudicating authority vide Order-in-Original No.02/ST/JC/Kop/2011, dated 24/28.03.2011 confirmed the demand of service tax of ₹ 29,64,569/-, demanded interest, rejected the Cenvat claim of ₹ 10,932/-, imposed penalties under Section 76 and 78 and also penalty of ₹ 5,000/- under section 77(2) on Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda. Aggrieved by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

77(2) on Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda, Managing Director of the Respondents Company. Being aggrieved by the said impugned order, the revenue filed this appeal challenging the portion of the order by which the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the penalties under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Shri Sanjeev Nair, Ld. Examiner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue Appellant reiterates the grounds of the Appeal. He further submits that setting aside the penalty under Sec. 78 is not jus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t produced any evidence to this claim. He submits, in view of the above undisputed facts the Ld. Commissioner wrongly waived the penalties imposed by the original authority under section 76 & 78 only on the ground of financial constraints of the respondent. In support of his submissions, he placed reliance on the following judgments: (a) Remac Marketing (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata [2009(13) S.T.R. 658(Tri. Kolkata)]. (b) Hotel Amarjit Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ears that there are two respondents, one is appellant company and other is Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda, who is Managing Director of the Company. He submits that as regard the penalty under Section 77 on Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda, Committee while reviewing the Commissioners order has not proposed the appeal against penalty under Section 77 set aside by the Commissioner; therefore, there is no appeal by the Revenue against Shri Diwan Rahul Nanda. He further submits that as regard the authorization by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecovered the service tax and did not deposit the same to the department. They have time and again submitted before the Adjudicating authority that huge amount of receivable payments from the client become bad debts which approximately amounting to ₹ 100 crores. In view of this fact it cannot be said that the respondent have retained the service tax collected by them rather respondent have lost huge amount i.e. 100 crores as against small amount of service tax liability. Considering above a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-MUM] (c) Commr. of C. Ex. Mumbai Vs. Top Detective & Security Services Pvt Ltd. [2005(180) 363 (Tri. Mumbai)] (d) Ralson Carbon Black Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. Chandigarh-I [2014(34) S.T.R. 227(Tri. Del.)] (e) M/s. Bhagwati Caterers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad [2014-TIOL-259-CESTAT-AHM]. (f) Toyota Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of E. Ex. Daman [2014(36) S.TR. 199 (Tri. Ahmd.)] (g) Commissioner of Service Tax Bangalore Vs. M/s. Motor World [2012-TIOL-418-HC-KAR- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ability in the ST3 returns, it shows that they are duty bound and undertake to discharged the service tax liability and it is on record that whatever demand was raised in the show cause notice and confirmed in the adjudication order, the same was paid by the appellant alongwith interest. Taking into consideration this undisputed facts, the Ld. Commissioner has passed very reasoned order wherein he has given the waiver of penalty under Section 76 and 78. The relevant paras of the findings of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Sheet. At the same time, they had to make salary payments of their employees and they have borrowed funds to pay to employees. Due to shortage of funds and huge outstanding with debtors, they could not deposit service tax in time. They relied upon the case of CCE V/s Tops Detective & Security Services (2005) f1 STT 22 = 180 ELT 363 = 3 STR 443 (CESTAT) wherein it was held that late receipt of payments from customers was sufficient cause. They also relied on the case law in Tiger Service Bure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. They stated that the company has never attempted to intentionally evade the levy of service tax at any time. It is not correct to say that the information in ST-3 return is mis-declared. They have submitted the detailed worksheet before any investigation or any audit programme. As regards unpaid service tax, they shown readiness to pay the same along with interest. Hence, penalty u/s 76 should not be made applicable to them. They could not make service tax payments in time due to financial har .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: REGISTRETION

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version