Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Dharwad. Versus The Income-tax Officer, TDS Ward, Dharwad

2015 (11) TMI 180 - ITAT BANGALORE

Non deduction of tds u/s 194LA - compensation paid to various persons for acquiring the non-agricultural land - Held that:- It is clear that the question of compulsory acquisition will arise only where the compensation cannot be determined by agreement. Sub-sec.3 & 4 will come into play only when there is a failure to determine the compensation through negotiation between State Government and the land owners.

When the compensation is based on an agreement between State Government and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Keeliputti, pertinent parts of which have been re-produced by us above, then these would not fall within the definition of compulsory acquisition. However, we are of the opinion, that the acquisition whether the acquisitions for which assessee had not deducted tax at source were based on agreements similar to the one produced by the assessee before us or in other words whether in all such compensation amounts were fixed in accordance with Sec. 29(2) of the KIA Act require verification by the low .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

question as to the failure of machinery provision for applying Sec.194LA is kept open at this juncture. - Decided partly in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - ITA No.1375(B)/2013 - Dated:- 23-9-2015 - SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Assessee : Shri Ashok Kulkarni, Advocate For The Revenue : Shri Gnanaprakash, CIT ORDER PER SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, AM: In this appeal filed by the assessee against an order dated 31-07- 2013 o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

default on the part of the assessee, the act of nondeduction is attributable to a bona-fide error on the part of the assessee. 5. The CI(A) ought to have appreciated that there were serious ambiguities, confusion and doubt regarding liability to deduct tax necessitating legislative interference. 6. Alternatively ad without prejudice the CIT(A) ought to have reduced to the extent of the amount collected from the land owners and remitted to the Government account and also to the extent of income d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

interest under section 201(1) & 201(1A) on the specific ground that the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board has clearly violated the provisions of 194LA whereas the land here in question is as per the provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Aras Development Act and the Sections there under and the Notifications issued for the purpose of acquisition, payment of compensation were all made by the State Government and therefore, the order is unsustainable. 2. This additional ground is onl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t position in law and the same has not been brought to my knowledge by my counsels. We may add here that the very additional aground no.3 is only an alternative ground. Hence, it is prayed that the above ground may be entertained and disposed of in accordance with law . 3. Facts apropos are that the assessee a State Government undertaking was subject to a survey proceeding under the Act. During the course of survey proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee had acquired certain pieces of land .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

For non-deduction of tax, assessee had relied on Circular issued by the revenue department of Bangalore, on 20- 05-2008. As per the assessee it had not deducted tax on compensation paid during the period May 2010 to April 2011. The AO was of the opinion that reliance placed by the assessee on the Circular issued by their higher authorities would not absolve it from its duty to deduct tax at source. He held that the assessee had failed to deduct tax at source u/s 194LA of the IT Act, on compensa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er the assessee the obligation to deduct tax at source was on the person responsible for deducting such tax. The person responsible was defined u/s 204 of the Act. As per the assessee, person responsible for paying in its case was the State Government and not the assessee. Reliance was also placed on amendment to Sec.204 of the IT Act, effective from 01-07- 2012, through which Drawing & Disbursement Officer (DDO) of a State Government or Central Government was included in the definition of p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A), submitted that the acquisitions were made by the State Government and the assessee was only a conduit. It was the State Government which was responsible for making the payments for the acquisition of the land. Just because an Officer of the assessee made the payments as per the learned AR, assessee could not be visited with the obligations stipulated u/s 194LA of the IT Act, 1961. Relying on Sec.2(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (KIADA) learned AR submitted tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8 of Sec.28, the learned AR submitted that the State Government after it had taken possession of the land acquired by it, transferred the land to the Board, only where such land was required by the Board. As per the learned AR Sec.29 of the KIADB Act, clearly specified that it was for the State Government to pay for the acquisition. As per the learned AR where the compensation was determined by agreement between the State Government and owner of the land, it ceased to be compulsory acquisition. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cessor and right holder of Land situated under the Survey No.636B, Plot No.16, Square Area, 0.01.03.75 situated at Unkal Village Talkuk Hobali in Dharwad Dist. As per the directions issued on behalf of the Hon ble Governor of Karnataka in favour of Authorities including the following terms and conditions of the said agreement which are as under; 1. Subject to my below mentioned right, the land situated under Survey No.636B, Plot No.16, Square Area: 0.01.03.75 situated at Unkal Village Taluk Hoba .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ined & thereby, we the land owners & the Govt. have mutually agreed for payment of land compensation to us & accordingly I am being the holder of the land & beneficiary for the land compensation amount, have submitted an application for claiming land compensation amount. Therefore, I have agreed as a land owner to receive the land compensation amount to be paid to the such owners fixed by the KIADB & to be collected from the said Board of ₹ 920791/- in full by executing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e. I am also bound by & I have agreed that the land compensation amount included for all the ownership rights & building situated in the said land. 4. In case, in future, if it is provided that I am not the true & original owner of the acquired land, then I am bound by and omitted to refund the entire compensation amount obtained by me & I will indemnify the losses and cost to the Board or to the Govt. immediately. 5. Further, in case the compensation amount is not refunded by me .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reements through which land was acquired were typically worded as the one reproduced above, none of the acquisition could be termed as compulsory acquisition. 8. In any case, according to him, person responsible for paying as defined in Sec. 204 did not include the Disbursing Officer or a person acting on behalf of the Central Government or State Government prior to 01-07- 2012. Hence, according to him, even if it was held that Sec.194LA of the Act, applied to the assessee, the machinery provisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authorities below and submitted that clause-iv added to sec.204 by Finance Act, 2012 was clarificatory in nature and this was explicitly stated in the Memorandum explaining the provisions in the Finance Bill, 2012. Being clarificatory, according to the learned AR it had to be given retrospective effect. Further, as per the learned DR, the Board was only an arm of the State and hence, the assessee was trying to wriggle out of its liability to deduct tax u/s 194LA of the IT Act, citing technicalit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, 2011. Arguments of the assessee can be divided in to two. The first limb of argument is that definition of person responsible for paying given in Sec.204, as it stood at the relevant point of time did not include an Officer of the Central Government or State Government and hence, computation provision failed. The second limb of its argument is that the acquisitions for which payment were effected were not compulsory in nature. 11. We deem it appropriate to first to deal with the second line of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, whichever is earlier, deduct an amount equal to ten percent of such sum as income-tax thereon. Provided that no deduction shall be made under this section where the amount of such payment or, as the case may be, the aggregate amount of such payments to a resident during the financial year does not exceed. (two) hundred thousand rupees. Explanation….For the purpose of this section,- i) agricultural land means agricultural land in India including land situate in any area referred to in i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

account of compulsory acquisition forms part of compensation. At para-22 of its judgment their Lordship s explained what could be considered as compulsory acquisition in the following words; 22. Compulsory nature of acquisition is to be distinguished from voluntary sale or transfer. In the latter, the land owner has the widest advantage in finding out a would be buyer and in negotiating with him regarding the sale price. Even in such negotiations or haggling normally no landowner would bargain f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ain for the sale price. It depends on what the Collector or the Court fixes as per the provisions of the Act. The solatium envisaged in sub-section (2) in consideration of the compulsory nature of the acquisition is thus not the same as damages on account of the distinction to part with the land acquired . 13. How far the above meaning could be applied in relation to interpretation of Sec.194LA of the IT Act, 1961 had come up before the Hon ble Chattisgarh High Court in the case of Naya Raipur D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xpropriation or is done in exercise of eminent domain the word, which was coined by 17th Century Jurist Grotius. 14. Halsbury s Laws of England, Vol.8(1), 4th Edition explains that where land on an interest in land is purchased or taken under statutory powers without the agreement of the owner . It is said to have been compulsorily acquired . 15. In Sunder Vs Union of India (2001) 7(SCC 211) the question involved before the Supreme Court was whether the State liable to pay interest on the amount .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he price. The price is fixed by the statute itself. The conditions that must be satisfied before a purchase can be said to be compulsory acquisition are as follows; (i) The seller has no option but to sell the land. (ii) The seller cannot negotiate the price. It is fixed by the statute or determined under the principles mentioned therein. 17. There are many examples of such statutes. The Zamindari Abolition Acts, Ceiling Acts, Nationalism Acts are examples of such compulsory acquisition but the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

umitra Shivanand Keeliputti which has reproduced by us at para-6 According to the Sec.28(6) of the said Act, the Govt. has acquired the said land & in this regard the Notice has been served to the land owners & right holders & to successors & to us to make payment of land compensation amount u/s 29(2) & accordingly further the land compensation amount has also been fixed & determined & thereby we he land owners & the Govt. have mutually agreed for payment of land .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nsation in accordance with the provisions of this Act. (2) Where the amount of compensation has been determined by agreement between the State Government and the person to be compensated, it shall be paid in accordance with such agreement . (3) Where no such agreement can be reached, the State Government shall refer the case to the Deputy Commissioner for determination of the amount of compensation to be paid for such acquisition as also the persons to whom such compensation shall be paid (4) On .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version