Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Transtron Electricals Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax

2015 (11) TMI 267 - ITAT DELHI

Revision u/s 263 - issue of share application money - Held that:- With regard to the issue of share application money, we find that the amount of ₹ 52,48,000/- taken by the CIT is a clear mistake and it represents the opening balance as on 01.04.2007 and, in fact, the addition during the year was of ₹ 2.53 lakhs. The assessee has filed the required details and the order of the learned CIT itself is erroneous on this issue. In these facts of the case, we hold that the learned CIT was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vouchers and bills, receipts etc. were also summoned and produced by the assessee on 25.10.2010 and on 28.10.2010. The accounts of the assessee were audited by the Chartered Accountant. We find that the order of learned CIT u/s 263 on this issue is based on mere suspicion and there is no material brought on record to suggest that the order of the Assessing Officer was erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Accordingly, we hold that there was no justification for the learned CI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2013. 2. The effective ground of appeal of the assessee is ground No.1, which reads as under:- "That the learned Commissioner of Income-tax erred in law and on the facts invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and passing the Order dated 25.03.2013. The Order passed and various directions given are bad in law, arbitrary, erroneous, illegal and unwarranted in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the material on record. The order, therefore, deserves .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

37,01,797/- and share application money of ₹ 52,48,000/- has been accepted by the A.O. without any enquiry or verification. b) There is difference in the receipt shown by the assessee in TDS certificate which is at ₹ 2,12,03,930/- and 26AS which is ₹ 2,22,87,066/- which means that there is a suppression of ₹ 10,83,136/-, which was required to be added to the income of the assessee, but A.O.s order is silent on this issue. c) Claims of expenses have been accepted as such w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

otice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 142(1) of the Act dated 10.05.2010 wherein in question No.5, the Assessing Officer had asked for confirmation of sundry creditors along with their permanent account numbers and complete address and copy of return of income, genuineness of the transaction and creditworthiness. He submitted that complete details were filed along with the confirmation from the trade creditors and they were existing income tax assessees and copy thereof has been filed at pag .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ars and was opening balance as on 01.04.2007 and the addition during the year was only ₹ 2.53 lakhs for which necessary evidence was filed. He referred to the relevant details filed in the compilation in this behalf. 5. Learned DR has opposed the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee on this issue. He submitted that not only enquiry but proper enquiry should have been made by the Assessing Officer, which was not done in this case. The Assessing Officer has failed to do any en .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A). Regarding the first issue of trade creditors and share application money, we find that the Assessing Officer has served on the assessee a notice u/s 142(1) of the Act dated 10.05.2010 wherein vide enquiry No.5, he has asked for the relevant details with regard to sundry creditors. The assessee has complied with the said notice and has given complete details along with copy of account, complete address and a confirmation of account along with permanent account number of the sundry credit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

share application money, we find that the amount of ₹ 52,48,000/- taken by the CIT is a clear mistake and it represents the opening balance as on 01.04.2007 and, in fact, the addition during the year was of ₹ 2.53 lakhs. The assessee has filed the required details and the order of the learned CIT itself is erroneous on this issue. In these facts of the case, we hold that the learned CIT was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the Act on the issue of trade credi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version