Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Aurangabad Versus M/s. Narinha Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.

2015 (11) TMI 360 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Denial of refund claim - payment of excess duty - held that:- The period extended for supply of its remaining quantity was also lapsed. Therefore as against 61,000 quintals the respondent could clear 17,329 quintals, hence excise duty paid by the respondent is in excess to what was payable and refund for an amount of ₹ 37,12,051/- arises. Refund was rejected by the Adjudicating authority only on the ground E.R.1 return shows clearance of quantity of 61,000 quintals and accordingly whatever .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd they were legally entitle for refund. - Decided against Revenue. - APPEAL NO. E/915/08 - Dated:- 30-6-2015 - Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) For the Petitioner : Shri. Sanjay Hasija, Superintendent (A.R.) ORDER Per : Ramesh Nair The appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. RKR (178) 260/07 dtd. 1/5/2008 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise & Customs, Aurangabad, wherein the Ld. Commissioner allowed the appeal filed by the appellant. 2. The fact of the case is th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this re-validation order. Since the respondent could not clear the said sugar even up to 25/5/2007, the director further extended validity of period for further 90 days from the date of issue of order dated 15/6/2007. Respondent were able to clear 1739 quintal of free sale sugar as evidenced from invoices 200-322. However, no clearance was effected 2006 onwards. Hence the respondent filed refund claim for excess amount of duty deposited in anticipation of the clearances, the said refund was rej .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who after going through not only the records but also from invoices, has conducted verification in the factory of the respondent and as per report given by the Superintendent (Appeals) appeal was allowed by the impugned order dated 1/5/2008, Aggrieved by the said impugned order Revenue is before me. 3. Shri Sanjay Hasija, Ld. Superintendent (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the ground of the appeal. He further submits that though ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

On the last occasion A.R. was directed to arrange to serve notice to the respondent, he stated that Jurisdictional officer made efforts to deliver notice but factory was closed, no responsible person was available, therefore notice could not be delivered. In this position, I have no option except taking the matter to disposal on the basis of the records available. 5. I have carefully considered the submission made by Ld. A. R. and perused records. 6. From the impugned order, I find that Ld. Comm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

excess. In this report, this official has indicated that,  I have verified RG 1 Register for the month of May 2006 and found Sugar clearance Quantity of November 2006 & December 2006 verified and found Sugar production and clearance. Duty paid vide TR 6 challan No. 1 & 2 of dated 05.01.2007 for ₹ 27,96,249/- only. The above view is reasonably in consonance with the Stock Position as certified by the Range Superintendent on 21-11-2007. Items showing Season wise Levy & Non-Levy .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version