Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Vivek Steels And Ors. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Indore

2015 (11) TMI 361 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Waiver of pre deposit - unregistered dealer - the applicant is a broker and introduced the parties with each other. He is neither registered dealer nor authorized dealer of Prakash Industries Ltd. - parallel invoices - Held that:- As per facts & circumstances of the case, Pre deposit is waived in some case and in some case it is directed to deposit the same. - Excise Stay Application Nos. 59376 - 59395 & 59525 of 2013 & Excise Appeal Nos. 58738 - 58757 & 58878 of 2013 - ORDER NO. S/ 52590 - 5261 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

City Steel Industries P Ltd., Diganath Steel Ind & Engg. Works, Prabhu Steel Industries, Munish Forging, R K Steel Industries, Raju Steel Industries, Swetal Steel Industries Ltd., Sunvijay Rolling and Engg. Ltd. And Prakash Industries Ltd. ORDER Per Ashok Jindal : E/stay/59376/2013 - Vivek Steels The applicant is a broker. The allegation of the Revenue is that applicant has traded the goods under the challans which was recovered from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation when the goods entered th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rcumstances, they duty amount worked out to ₹ 1.5 lakh approx. Therefore, we direct the applicant to make a pre-deposit of ₹ 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only within a period of four weeks and report compliance on 27.8.2015. On such compliance, balance amount of penalty shall remain waived during the pendency of the appeal. E/stay/59377/2013 - Jai Ambey Goods Carrier. E/stay/59378/2013 - Lift and Shift The applicants are seeking waive of pre-deposit of penalties imposed upon the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penalty imposed on the applicants and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeals. E/stay/59379 /2013 - Shri Ashok Kumar Sharma E/stay/ 59380/2013 - Shri Rakesh Kumar Bhadoria E/stay/ 59381/2013 - Shri S N Jha E/stay/ 59382/2013 - Shri Sanjay Kumar Joshi E/stay/ 59383/2013 - Shri N K Gupta The applicant are seeking waiver of pre-deposit of penalties imposed upon them under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 3. As the applican .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es, 2002 and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeals. E/stay/ 59384/2013 - Shri G L Mohta The applicant is seeking waiver of pre-deposit of penalty imposed upon him under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. Heard the parties. 3. Considering the fact that applicant is whole time Director of the M/s. Prakash Industries Ltd. who was involved in duty evasion as per the impugned order. As the applicant was issued summons and he did not appear for hearing or for statement. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Sharda Ispat Ltd. E/stay/59388/2013 - Orange City Steel Industries P Ltd. E/stay/59389/2013 - Diganath Steel Ind & Engg. Works E/stay/59390/2013 - Prabhu Steel Industries E/stay/59391/2013 - Munish Forging E/stay/59392/2013 - R K Steel Industries E/stay/59393/2013 - Raju Steel Industries And E/stay/59394/2013 - Swetal Steel Industries Ltd. The applicants are seeking waiver of pre-deposit of penalties imposed upon them under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. The allegation against .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Therefore, prima facie applicants have made out a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. In these terms, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of penalties imposed on them and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeals. E/stay/59395/2013 - Sunvijay Rolling and Engg. Ltd. Applicant is seeking waiver of pre-deposit of penalty confirmed against them under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. The allegation against the applicant is that 2004 invoices were recovered from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version