Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 390 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

2015 (11) TMI 390 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT - [2015] 376 ITR 507 (T&AP) - Disallowance of benefit of accumulation by the assessee of an amount u/s 11(2) - ITAT allowed calim - Held that:- The required information was furnished through Form No. 10 along with the return and subsequently on March 10, 1997, the assessee submitted another letter to the Assessing Officer intimating the specific purpose for which the said amount was sought to be utilised by indicating that they want to utilise the am .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by September 30, 1996, the last date for filing of the return. It is an admitted fact that the said information was furnished before the completion of the assessment.

In view of the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in Nagpur Hotel Owners' Association (2000 (12) TMI 99 - SUPREME Court) and the acceptance of the date of information by the assessee as March 10, 1997, viz., before the date of completion of assessment by the Tribunal, we do not think that the objection raised by the l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act"), against the order in I. T. A. No. 133/V/1997 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, on March 5, 2003. 2. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the substantial question of law that arises for our consideration is as follows : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, was perverse in reversing the order passed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ding medical relief, rendering help to the people affected by natural calamities, etc. It was registered under section 12A of the Act. It filed its return of income for the assessment year 1996-97 on September 25, 1996, declaring nil income. The return was processed and taken up for scrutiny and notices under sections 142(1) and 143(2) of the Act were issued. Pursuant to the said notices, the secretary of the trust appeared before the Assessing Officer and produced the books of account for verif .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lly and economically weaker sections of the society as mentioned in clause 3(a) of the trust deed. He also expressed his willingness to file a revised Form No. 10 for consideration and acceptance. The Assessing Officer passed an order on March 12, 1997, disallowing the benefit of accumulation under section 11(2) of the Act for the amount of ₹ 3,00,000 and demanded the tax at ₹ 1,27,676. Against the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

owed the appeal preferred by the Revenue holding as follows : "In view of the latest position of law as has been held by the apex court in the case of Nagpur Hotel Owners' Association, although there is no specific time limit in the statue for passing on notification/ information to the Assessing Officer regarding the purpose of accu mulation, yet the assessee has to pass the information before the assessment is completed. Even holding such view of the matter and without taking resort t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) suffers from serious infirmity and has to be rejected. Hold ing such view of the matter, we cancel the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby allowed." Against the said order of the Tribunal, the present appeal was preferred by the assessee. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the explanatory letter was submitted to the Assessing Officer on March 10, 1997, well before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g Officer and, hence, the order of the Tribunal is incorrect in law. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue, on the other hand, submitted, by placing reliance on rule 17 of the Income-tax Rules read with section 139 of the Act that the assessee should have filed required information by September 30, 1996, but submitted the information only on March 10, 1997, and, hence, could not be taken into consideration. But he fairly submitted that the explanation in the letter dated March 10, 1997, is i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccumulated or set apart shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income, provided the following conditions are complied with, namely :- (a) such, person specifies, by notice in writing given to the Assessing Officer in the prescribed manner, the purpose for which the income is being accumulated or set apart and the period for which the income is to be accumulated or set apart, which shall in no case exceed ten years ; (b) the money so accumul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d to it under section 256(1) of the Act for the assessment year 1984-85 (page 820 of 199 ITR) : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that there is nothing illegal on the part of the assessee in giving notice to the Income-tax Officer in Form No. 10 listing all its objects for the purpose of accumulation of income as provided in section 11(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which requires specification of the purposes ? 2. W .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d case, the Income-tax Officer allowed the exemption under section 11 of the Act by relying on the notice given by the assessee under section 11(2) of the Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax, by invoking the powers vested in him under section 263 of the Act called for and examined the assessment records of the assessee. After notice to the assessee and response, he set aside the order of assessment and ordered for de novo enquiry. The assessee preferred an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee was not accepted holding that the said contention would render the requirement of specification of the purpose for accumulation in that sub-section redundant. It was held that the purposes to be specified cannot, under any circumstances, tread beyond the objects clause of the trust and the Legislature could not have thought of the need of specification of the purpose if it did not have in mind the particularity of the purpose or purposes falling within the ambit of the objects clause of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and Restaurant Association [2003] 261 ITR 190 (Delhi) and it was held as follows (page 192) : "It is true that specification of certain purpose or purposes is needed for accumulations of the trust's income under section 11(2) of the Act. At the same time the purpose or purposes to be specified cannot be beyond the objects of the trust. Plurality of the purposes for accumulation is not precluded but it depends on the precise purpose for which the accumulation is intended. In the present .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and Co. Environmental Trust [2008] 303 ITR 111 (Delhi) the above issue was considered and the aforementioned decision of the Calcutta High Court was also noticed. Following the earlier judgment in Hotel and Restaurant Association (supra) the High Court reiterated its view. 11. The Supreme Court also had an occasion to consider section 11 of the Act in Nagpur Hotel Owners' Association (supra), wherein the issue related to the time period within which the information should be furnished to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version