Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

A.C.I.T., Central Circle 1 (1) , Ahmedabad Versus Shri Amar Mukesh Shah

Addition on account of suppression of profit by the assessee by way of client code modifications by the borkers in a large number of commodity transactions - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Assessment was framed u/s. 153A (1)(b) r.w.s. 143(3) - Held that:- CIT(A) while deleting the addition has noted that the A.O had calculated notional profits on the assumption as if Client Code Modifications were not carried out and the transactions were closed on the expiry date. Ld. CIT(A) has further noted th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nue are against the order of CIT(A)-I, Ahmedabad dated 22.11.2010 for A.Y. 2005-06 & 2007-08 respectively. 2. At the outset, before us, both the parties submitted that though the appeal of the Assessee relates to two different assessment years but the facts and circumstances of both the years are similar except for the assessment years and amounts involved and the submissions are also common for both the appeals and therefore both the appeals can be heard together. We therefore proceed to di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tained computer data belonging to assessee and accordingly, in view of the provisions of Section 153C r.w.s. 153A of the Act, proceedings u/s. 153C were initiated against the Assessee by issuing notice on 16.09.2009 and in response to which Assessee filed his return of income on 27.10.2009 declaring total income at ₹ 77,99,300/-. Thereafter the assessment was framed u/s. 153A (1)(b) r.w.s. 143(3) vide order dated 29.12.2009 and the total income was determined at ₹ 99,25,850/-. Aggrie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of commodity transactions. 5. A.O has noted that Assessee was engaged in commodity transactions through its broker, Kunwarji Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd. He has noted that on enquiries conducted by Investigation Wing, it was revealed that Kunwarji Commodity Brokers Pvt. Ltd. had done Client Code Modifications unusually high number of times during financial year 2004-05 to 2006-07 and the modifications were resorted with malafide intentions and was for the purpose of transferring the profits/loss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

im of ₹ 20,73,543/- was treated as suppressed profit of Assessee. Aggrieved by the order of A.O., Assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) who deleted the addition made by the A.O by holding as under:- 5.2 I have considered the facts of the case and submissions of the appellant. The entire facts with regard to the adverse inferences drawn by the Assessing Officer on account of Client Code Modifications have been elaborately discussed by me in the case of Kunwarji Finance Pvt. Ltd. whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d with the data of the Commodity Exchanges. The mismatch which has been worked ,out by the Assessing Officer is only on account of the fact that the Assessing Officer has calculated notional profits on the assumption as if Client Code Modifications were not carried out and the transactions were closed on the expiry date. While deciding the appeals in the case of KFPL, on similar issues, it was forcefully argued before me that the addition on the basis of Client Code Modifications are only -on as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ficer for his conclusion that the client code modifications were deliberately and mala fide carried out with a view to transfer the profits so as to reduce the incidence of tax in the case of Kunwarji Group. I have also considered the detailed submissions made before me on behalf of the appellant Company and have also gone through the various judicial pronouncements cited before me. At the very outset, it may be stated that the huge additions made by the Assessing Officer in the assessment years .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made by the Assessing Officer and the Assessing Officer has drawn his own inferences from the client code modifications. Further, the additions made by the Assessing Officer are on the basis of certain assumptions. The main basis of the Assessing Officer for making the additions is that large number of client code modifications were carried out by KCBPL and such modifications during the four Assessment Years under appeal come to 36,161. The assessee explained to the Assessing Officer as also bef .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

code modifications carried out directly by the traders come to 45% of such modifications, which means that the percentage of modifications carried out by KCBPL would be around 0.5%. It was further explained with supporting evidence that one trading order normally comprises of more than one trade, which would further reduce the percentage of modifications to a negligent figure. This point has been explained at page - 35 of the Statement of Facts with reference to transactions at MCX. The total n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

missible to the extent of 1%. If such modifications are more than 1% but less than or equal to 5%, nominal penalty of ₹ 500 is leviable. In the present case, if all the facts are objectively analysed, it is seen that effectively the client code modifications can be said to.be around 0.5% for the Assessment Years under appeal. Therefore, I see no justification in the assumption of the Assessing Officer that large number of client code modifications was carried out. For the same reason, ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ations were thoroughly explained before the Assessing Officer as also before me. The assessee's explanation has been summarised under six points at pages - 42 to 43 of the Statement of Facts. These reasons are convincing and obviously, the client code modifications have been carried out to rectify genuine punching errors. If such genuine errors are not rectified, and the transactions allowed continuing in the name of wrong clients, it would result into a chaotic situation. Therefore, I see n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d suppressed profits on a further assumption that the open position in all contracts to buy or sell are squared off at the expiry prices of the contract. In other words, the Assessing Officer assumed that the transactions would be finalised at the expiry date and accordingly, he calculated the assumed profit on the basis of the prices of the commodity prevailing at the expiry date. Apparently this is a hypothetical . (ii) The Assessing Officer completely ignored the correct factual position that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

date and how the expiry prices can be adopted for calculating the so called suppressed profits. (iv) The trading parties could not have been aware of the expiry price and, therefore, no motive can be imputed that the modifications were carried out with a view to avoid tax. There is no material whatsoever to support the conclusion drawn by the Assessing Officer that client code modifications were carried out mala fide with a view to transfer profits. Such assumption is totally illogical for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dology adopted by the Assessing Officer for calculating notional and hypothetical profits gives rise to several crucial questions which remain unanswered and this point was thoroughly explained by the assessee at pages -14 to 19 of the reply dated-23rd November, 2009 filed before the Assessing Officer. These anomalies in the presumptions of the Assessing Officer have also been explained at pages - 45 to 50 of the Statement of Facts. 4.13 Another factor which cannot be ignored is that all transac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y various letters filed by the assessee as enumerated at pages 57 to 66 of the Statement of Facts which have been reproduced supra. 4.14 Considering the entire facts and the legal position, I have no hesitation in holding that the additions made by the Assessing Officer in the four Assessment Years under appeal on account of client code modifications are without any basis and accordingly these additions are deleted." 5.3 Further, in the case of the appellant the total number of Client Code .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty of the facts and the legal position I hold that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of Client Code Modifications is without any basis whatsoever and accordingly, these additions are deleted. 6. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of ld. CIT(A), Revenue is now in appeal before us. 7. Before us, ld. D.R strongly supported the order of A.O. On the other hand ld. A.R. reiterated the submissions made before A.O and ld. CIT(A) and further submitted that in case of Kunwarji Finance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reduction in profit due to client modification in A.Y. 2005-06 & 2007-08 but when there was increase in profit due to Client Code Modifications in A.Y. 2006-07, the increase in profits was accepted by him. He further placed reliance on the decisions in the case of Sambhavnath Investment vs. ACIT 38 CCH 077, Ashok Goyal (HUF) vs. ACIT 37 CCH 543 and Alpha Commodities Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT ITA No. 2119/Mum/2010. He also placed on record the copy of the aforesaid decisions. He thus supported the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Client Code Modifications was on the basis of assumption and surmises and was not on the basis of concept of real income. We further find that in the case of Kunwarji Finance Pvt. Ltd. (supra) against the order of ld. CIT(A), Revenue had preferred appeal before the Co-ordinate Bench of Tribunal which was dismissed by the Co-ordinate Bench by order dated 19.03.2015 and the relevant finding of the Co-ordinate Bench reads as under:- 8.We have carefully considered the arguments of both the sides .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder:- "Circular no. MCX/T&S/032/2007 January 22, 2007 Client Code Modifications In terms of provisions of the Rules, Bye-Laws and Business Rules of the Exchange, the Members of the Exchange are notified as under: forward Markets Commission (FMC) vide its letter no. 6/3/2006/MKT-II (VOL III) dated December 20, 2006 and January 5, 2007 has directed as under. a. The facility of client code modifications intra-day are allowed. b. b. The members are also allowed to change their client codes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

client trades and client trades shall not be allowed to be modified as proprietary trades. e. In order to ensure that client codes are entered with alertness and care, a penalty on the client code changes made on a daily basis shall be imposed as under S.No Percentage of Client Code changed to total orders (matched) on a daily basis Penalty (Rs.) 1 Less than or equal to 1% Nil 2 Greater than 1 % but less than or equal to 5% 500 3 Greater than 5% but less than or equal to 10% 1000 4 Greater than .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t compliance." From the above, it is evident that client code modification is permitted intra-day, i.e. on the same day. As per Commodity Exchange, if client code modification is upto 1% of the total orders, there is no penalty and if it is greater than 1% but less than 5%, the penalty is ₹ 500/-. If it is greater than 5% but less than 10%, penalty is ₹ 1000/- and if it is greater than 10%, then penalty is ₹ 10,000/-. From the above, the only inference that can be drawn is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aragraph No.4.3, the CIT(A) has given the number of transactions entered into by the assessee for the period 2004-05 to 2007-08 and the number of client code modification and percentage thereof. We have also reproduced the same at paragraph No.6 of our order. From the said details, it is evident that the client code modification was done in four years 36,161 times. As an absolute figure, the client code modification may look very high, but if we look it at in terms of total transactions, it is o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the opinion that the client code modification was quite nominal and not unusually high as alleged by the Assessing Officer. 9. The Assessing Officer held the client code modifications to be malafide with the intention to transfer the profit to other person by modifying the client code so as to avoid the payment of tax. From the circular of the Commodity Exchange, it is evident that client code modification is permitted on the same day. Therefore, we are unable to find out any justification f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

there was no basis or justification to hold the same to be malafide. 10. Moreover, the Id. Assessing Officer has computed the notional profit/loss till the transactions period and not till the period by which the client code modification took place. Even if the view of the Revenue is accepted that the client code modification was with malafide intention, then the profit or loss accrued till the client code modification can be considered in the case of the assessee but by no stretch of imaginatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: REGISTRETION

Notification: Absolute Exemption from IGST on inter-State supplies of goods

Notification: CGST Rate Schedule u/s 9(1) - notifying rates of CGST @ 2.5%, 6%, 9%, 14%, 1.5% and 0.125% on Supply of Goods

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version