Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Central Circle-11, New Delhi Versus Metro Management Service Pvt. Ltd.

Protective assessment - Addition on investment in land from undisclosed income - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT(A) noted that the appellant/assessee was able to convince the AO that it had only made cheque payments to M/s Om Metal and no cash payment has been made by the assessee company. The CIT(A) also noted that the cash payment has been made by M/s Om Metal and the property was not purchased in the name of present assessee and as such there is not enough evidence to allege ‘ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

en made by M/s Om Metal then protective addition in the hands of assessee is not sustainable and the same was correctly deleted by the first appellate authority i.e. CIT(A). We are unable to see any valid reason to interfere with the impugned order and we uphold the same on this ground. - Decided against revenue.

Addition u/s 68 - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- While we analyse last operative paras of CIT(A), it is amply clear that the AO added as received from NKP Holding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rbed the returned amount and the same has been accepted. In view of above noted facts, the CIT(A) rightly concluded that the amount added by the AO was received by the assessee from NKPH and when there is no adverse inference in the case of NKPH, the same cannot be held as unexplained in the case of assessee. Hence, we are in agreement with the conclusion of the CIT(A) that the protective addition in the hands of assessee is not sustainable and he rightly directed the AO to delete the same.- Dec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orrect in deleting the protective addition in the case of the assessee and we are unable to see any valid reason to interfere with the same and we uphold the conclusion of the CIT(A) on this sole issue. - I.T.A. No. 6455/Del/2013, I.T.A. No. 6456/Del/2013 - Dated:- 14-10-2015 - Shri N. K. Saini, Accountant Member And Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial Member For the Appellant : Shri Atiq Ahmad, Sr. DR, Gajanand Meena CIT DR For the Respondent : None ORDER Per Bench These appeals by the revenue ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AO on account of investment in land from undisclosed income. (3) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of ₹ 63,00,000/- made by AO Under Section.68 of the I T Act on protective basis. 3. At the outset, it is relevant to mention that when the appeals were called for hearing, neither the assessee nor his representative appeared before us nor any adjournment applications were filed on behal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se of land is taken at ₹ 2.26 crores which was consideration as investment in land from undisclosed income. Hence, to protect the interest of the revenue, a protective addition was made in the hands of the assessee and substantive addition was made in the hands of M/s Om Metal Developers Private Limited. Ld. DR vehemently contended that the CIT(A) deleted the addition without any justified reason, hence, the same may be set aside by restoring that of the AO. 5. On careful perusal of the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e premises of Shiv-Vani Group at F-315, Ground Floor, Lado Sarai, New Delhi vide page 135 to 146 of annexure A -5 of party B-l4, Page 4 of annexure A-I seized from residence of R.K. Somani from his Malviya Nagar residence confirms that 10 acre of land was purchased by the Om Metal Group & Metro Management Services Private Limited (of Shiv Vani Group) at the rate of 5 crore per acres. However, only 10 acres was purchased for a consideration of ₹ 20.30 crores in the books of Om Metal Dev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4.2.2 The AR had submitted before the AO that the actual purchase of the land was not done by the appellant. The purchaser was OM Metal Developers Pvt. Ltd. The amount paid by the appellant was all in cheque and that the same has been duly accounted in its books. It was submitted before the AO that the appellant had only paid ₹ 5.10 crores as loans to the said OM Management Services Pvt. Ltd. towards its share in the property. The appellant also submitted confirmation from the said party b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hare for which it had paid the amount of ₹ 5.10 crores through banking channel for its share. The 6.5% share of ₹ 55 crore works out to ₹ 3.58 crore (Approx) and even if the amount paid of ₹ 55 crores & advance of another 10 acre of land for ₹ 20 crores (Approx) is considered the total works out to ₹ 75 crores and the of land for ₹ 20 crores (Approx) is considered the total works out to ₹ 75 crores and the assessee company's 6.5% shares com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 34.70 crores (i.e. 55 crores - 20.30 crores has been paid in cash by the purchaser (Mls. Om Metal Developers Private Limited). The assessee company M/s. Metro Management Services Private Limited has 6.5% shares in M/s. Om Metal Developers Private Limited. The share of the assessee company in cash payment comes to ₹ 2.26 crores approximately. 4.2.4 The AO has however, made an addition of ₹ 2.26 crores on protective basis in order to protect the interest of Revenue. 4.2.5 I have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y. Further the AO also does not say that the cash payment was made by the appellant company. The AO merely says that the appellant's shares in the cash payment comes to ₹ 2.26 crores. 4.2.6 It is also noted that even if the amount paid, including the cash portion, on the above transaction is taken at ₹ 75 crores which includes ₹ 20 crore advance, for another 10 acre of land, the appellant's share in the said amount works out to much less than the amount paid by the appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts to M/s Om Metal and no cash payment has been made by the assessee company. The CIT(A) also noted that the cash payment has been made by M/s Om Metal and the property was not purchased in the name of present assessee and as such there is not enough evidence to allege cash payment to the assessee and the AO also does not say that cash payment was made by the assessee. Furthermore, the CIT(A) also concluded that even if the amount paid, including cash portion, on the above transaction is taken a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the impugned order and we uphold the same on this ground. Accordingly, ground no. 1 of the Revenue being devoid of merits is dismissed. Ground No. 2 of the Revenue 7. Apropos ground no.2 of the Revenue, we have heard arguments of ld. DR and also carefully perused the relevant material placed on record before us. Ld. DR submitted that the AO noticed that as per facts brought on record by the AO, Shri N.K. Jain was an entry operator who was involved in giving entries to various group concerns of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of the AO. 8. On careful perusal of the impugned order, we noted that the CIT(A) granted relief to the assessee by observing as under:- 4.3.4 It is noticed that the amount mentioned in the said page of the annexure against the appellant's name is very much supported by credit entries III the appellant's bank account. At page 21 of their paper book the appellant has enclosed bank statement of the appellant maintained with ABN Ambro Bank (produced before the AO), wherein there are follow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

accounted in the assessee's books. It has been further submitted that since Mr. Jain was maintaining the bank accounts at Kolkota, his name appears at the top of the page. However the amounts written against various names of the companies are not cash transactions but bank transactions duly reflected in the books and explained to the AO with all supporting documents during the assessment proceedings. 4.3.6 I find that none of the credit entries relate to any cash deposits. They are all eithe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

transaction materialized through banking channel". However he holds that the source is not explained. 4.3.7 It is observed that in the assessment proceedings the complete books of accounts, bank statements & transactions were explained to the AO and no adverse inference was drawn by the AO on the books of accounts & transactions mentioned therein. 4.3.8 The AO has added ₹ 63 Lakhs. The AR has submitted that the same represents share application amount received from group conce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on from NKP holding Pvt. Ltd., the copy of which has also been submitted in the paper book at Page No. 39. The AR has also enclosed copy of assessment order of NKP holding Pvt. Ltd. for A.Y. 2007-08 passed by the same assessing officer on 28.03.2013 and submitted that in the said order, the AO has not disturbed the total income returned by the AO. 4.3.9 Thus it is clear that the amount added by the AO was received from NKP Holdings Pvt. Ltd. a group concern which is also assessed to tax by the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ver, the details found at page 56 of B-14/A-14 (being seized material) were not having any cash element not accounted in the assessee s books. The CIT(A) has further observed that during the assessment proceedings, the complete books of accounts, bank statement and transactions were explained to the AO and no adverse inference was drawn by the AO therein. The CIT(A) explicitly held that none of the credit entries relate to any cash deposit and they are either Bank to Bank transfers or cheque dep .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ource of the same was fully explained as the bank account was maintained by Shri N.K. Jain in his name which appeared in the copy of the bank statement. These entries were very well reflected in the bank statement of account with Punjab National Bank. The CIT(A) also noted that confirmation from NKPH was submitted before the AO during assessment proceedings and from the assessment order for AY 2007-08 passed in the case of NKPH, the AO has not disturbed the returned amount and the same has been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id of merits is also dismissed. ITA No. 6456/Del/2013 of the Revenue 11. The sole ground raised by the Revenue in this appeal reads as follows:- (4) The order of ld. CIT(A) is not correct in law and facts. (5) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of ₹ 5,00,00,000/- made by the AO u/s 68 of the I.T. Act. 12. Ld. DR submitted that the AO noticed that transactions at page 56 of Annexure -1 show that impugned trans .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ands of the assessee as it was a beneficial owner of these transactions. Ld. DR vehemently contended that the AO was quite justified in making impugned addition pertaining to the alleged transaction related to the assessee pertaining to assessment year under consideration and rightly treated the same as unexplained transaction materialised through banking channel wherein source was not properly explained. Ld. DR lastly submitted that the impugned order may be set aside by restoring that of the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

operly explained. Ld. DR lastly submitted that the impugned order may be set aside by restoring that of the AO. 15. On careful consideration of above submissions of the Revenue, at the outset, from bare reading of the impugned order, we noted that the CIT(A) granted relief to the assessee by observing as under:- 4.2.4 It is noticed that the amount mentioned in the said page of the annexure against the appellant's .name is very much supported by credit entries in the appellant's bank acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7 By CLEARING - 454962 (BRABDURKE ROAD) 50,00,000.00 06-09-2007 By CLEARING - 454966 (BRABDURKE ROAD) 50,00,000.00 06-09-2007 By CLEARING - 454967 (BRABDURKE ROAD) 50,00,000.00 06-09-2007 By CLEARING - 454968 (BRABDURKE ROAD) 50,00,000.00 06-09-2007 By CLEARING - 454969 (BRABDURKE ROAD) 50,00,000.00 07-09-2007 By CLEARING - 454970 (BRABDURKE ROAD) 40,00,000.00 4.2.5 It has been explained that wherever there was cash element in the transaction with Mr. lain, the appellant has duly included the sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt proceedings. 4.2.6 I find that none of the credit entries relate to any cash deposits. They are all either bank-to-bank transfers or cheque deposits. The narrations in the bank account give the details of the account nos from where the amount has been received or the cheque numbers. I. also observe that there appears to be no dispute about amounts having been received in the appellant's bank account through banking channels. The AO also admits in the assessment order that all these transa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7; 5,00,00,000/-. The AR has submitted that the same represents share application amount received from group concern which is very much assessed by the same AO. The amount of ₹ 5,00,00,000/- was received from the Macro Leafin Pvt. Ltd. on 10 different dates. Since the bank account was maintained by Mr. N. K. Jain his name appears at the top of the page. The source of the amount is thus explained fully. Further the entries to this effect are also available in the bank account statement of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the amount added by the AO was received from Macro Leafin Pvt. Ltd. a group concern which is also assessed to tax by the same Assessing Officer. In the assessment order of Macro Leafin Pvt. Ltd. there is no adverse finding of the AO. Considering these facts, there is no ground for holding the amount as unexplained. Thus ₹ 5,00,00,000/- added on protective basis is hereby deleted. 16. In the light of conclusion of the AO and observations of the first appellate authority, we note that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

News: Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters

News: Clarification about Transition Credit

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 08/2017-IT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services.

News: Tax on fuel more important for a dry state like Gujarat

Highlight: For an ayurvedic medicine to be classified under Chapter 30 has to pass the test whether it is for cure of any disease. If the same is only meant for care, then such product would not fall under medicament.

Highlight: Demand of interest - the period of limitation that applies to a claim for the principal amount should also apply to the claim of interest thereon.

Highlight: Government issues new notifications under CGST, IGST and UTGST to grant fresh exemptions in respect of certain supplies.

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

Article: SIMPLIFIED E-WAY BILL UNDER GST

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version