GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 605 - SUPREME COURT

2015 (11) TMI 605 - SUPREME COURT - 2015 (325) E.L.T. 232 (SC) - Valuation of goods - Undervaluation - determination of cost of production as per CAS-4 - inclusion of interest expenditure, depreciation and profit margin - Clearance of goods to sister concern - Captive consumption - Held that:- The impugned order of the Tribunal shall reflect that the Tribunal has kept in mind the Costing Accounting Standard 4 (CAS-4) as adopted by the Department itself. On that basis, it has come to the conclu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

krishnan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv., Mrs. Aruna Gupta, Adv., Mr. Jitin Singhal, Adv., Mr. Pratik, Adv. And Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. V. Sridharan, Sr. Adv., Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv., Ms. L. Charanaya, Adv., Mr. Hemant Bajaj, Adv., Mr. T.D. Satish, Adv., Mr. Anandh K., Adv. And Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. ORDER The issue involved in the present appeal relates to the alleged under valuation of Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB) which is manufactured and cleared by the res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uct. We may also mention that the parties are ad idem that the costing of LAB is to be done as per Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 which prescribes cost method. The appellant-Department had issued five show-cause notices to the respondent herein for different periods alleging therein that the costing as done by the respondent - assessee was not in accordance with the method of costing and it resulted in under valuation and thus lesser payment of duty. The differential duty was, thus, demande .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lyst cost not Includible (6) 333.18 365.34 365.34 (-) Catalyst cost not includible 190.50 1190.50 1190.50 (=) Interest Expenditure 0.00 623.38 623.38 (9)=(4)=(5)-(6)-(7)+(8) 35522.15 34057.96 34057.96 (+) Profit Margin @ 10% (10) 3552.22 34005.80 34005.80 Cost of production as per submissions (11) = (9) + (10) 37764.81 36154.20 36154.20 Value at which duty has been paid (12) 37700.00 37700.00 45000.00 (upto December) (1999) 46500 (From January 2000) The demand was confirmed after considering the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version