Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (11) TMI 614

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... specific provisions contained under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, no show cause notice for the said liability should have been issued to them. It is conceded by the Appellant that this plea has not been raised before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) and advanced for the first time before this Tribunal. In the interest of justice, I am of the view that the appellant be given a fair chance to raise the said plea before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) and the Ld. Commissioner should accordingly consider the same and decide the issue of imposition of penalty under Sec.76 of Finance Act,1994, accordingly. - Appeal disposed of. - ST/71430/2013 - Order No : FO/a/75494/15 - Dated:- 4-9-2015 - Dr. D.M. Misra, Judicial Member, J. For .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e of the show cause notice. It is the plea of the Ld. Advocate that since there was no suppression of facts and mis-declaration in discharging the service tax liability, therefore, show cause notice should not have been issued as the amount had already been paid before the issuance of the show cause notice in view of specific provisions prescribed under Section 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994. In support of his contention, he has referred to the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of Electro World Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh reported in 2010 (20) S.T.R. 210 (Tri.-Del.), Auto Transport Services Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II reported in 2006 (3) S.T.R. 330 (Tri.-Del.) and Gopsons Papers Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Centr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the impugned Order contended that since the appellant had discharged their liability before issuance of show cause notice, therefore, in view of the specific provisions contained under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, no show cause notice for the said liability should have been issued to them. It is conceded by the Appellant that this plea has not been raised before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) and advanced for the first time before this Tribunal. In the interest of justice, I am of the view that the appellant be given a fair chance to raise the said plea before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) and the Ld. Commissioner should accordingly consider the same and decide the issue of imposition of penalty under Sec.76 of Finance Act,1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates