Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Parvez J. Irani And M/s Daroowala Bros. & Co. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Export) JNCH, Nhava Sheva

2015 (11) TMI 944 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Confiscation of goods - Penalty u/s 114 - CHA did not take care to verify the genuineness of export/exporters and therefore they have aided in smuggling of red sanders - Held that:- It is already concluded in favour of the appellants that they have not indulged themselves malafidely in filing of the shipping bill in question, leading to attempted export of prohibited goods. The Act of negligence and lack of vigilance on the part of the appellants have already been taken care of under the provisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

facts of the present case - Decided in favour of appellant. - APPEAL NO. C/85901 & 85902/13 -MUM - Final Order Nos. A/1383-1384/2015/WZB/SMB - Dated:- 13-5-2015 - Shri Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) For the Petitioner : Shri Anil Balani, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri M.K. Sarangi, Dy. Commr. (A.R.) ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary: The appellants are in appeal against the common order passed by the learned Commissioner of Customs appeals, MumbaiII dated 22/11/2012, wherein their appeal was all .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/4/2008 the appellant-partner met the said Yogesh at JNCH building, near parking area, and was informed that there was a job of one M/s APW President Systems Ltd. having IEC code for export of zinc oxide under factory stuffing procedure. The said Yogesh also showed invoice bearing Central Excise examination report wherein the factory stuffing permission was indicated. The appellant verified the genuineness of the factory staffing permission by going to the 6th floor of the Customs house and foun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in good faith finding the container sealed having the Customs bottle seal and Central Excise seal intact filed the shipping bill and the container was entered in the CFSspeedy buffer yard. The accompanying invoice was also countersigned by the Preventive Officer after verifying the bottle seal and Central Excise seal. In the morning of 2/5/2008 appellant received telephone call from the DRI office enquiring about the address of the said Mr. Yogesh to which the appellant cooperated by giving the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efore the Commissioner (Appeals). 4. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order has taken notice of the order dated 9/06/2010 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (general) wherein the following findings have been recorded in favour of the appellants 31. To sum up, I am of the view that the CHA have performed their job in a casual manner. Even though, I do not fully concur with the findings in the Inquiry Reports, there are enough evidence on records that point out that the CHA ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der suspension on 25.07.2008 and they have been out of business since then causing enormous hardship to the company and to the staff and their family members. Relying on the said finding and also the forfeiture of security deposit the punishment already given under the provisions of CHALR and also taking notice of the fact that the said order have been accepted by the Review Committee, allowed the appeal in part reducing the penalty by 50%. Being still aggrieved the appellants are before this Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g no penalty could've been imposed and/or retained as has been done by the impugned order. The Counsel further relies on the ruling's in the case of Neptune Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Customs 2007 (219) ELT 673, A Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Attempted Export of Red Sandalwood, Considering the fact that the CHA had no role in the transaction that led to confiscation of contraband, except that the manager of CHA being negligent, facilitated the export o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

It is further urged that for the allegation of abetment to stand there has to be finding as to consideration for the said abetment, which is absent in the facts of the present case. The appellant further relies on the ruling in the case of Sethu Samudra 2010 (262) ELT 570, by Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Smuggling of Red Sanders, on the finding that no fact come on record about the involvement of the CHA in the attempt to smuggle out red sanders. Nothing incriminating had been recorded on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder the goods liable to confiscation, no penalty is attracted under Section 114(i). Accordingly the learned Counsel prays for deleting the penalty in full. 6. The learned A.R. relies on the impugned order. It is further stated that in view of the negligence and/or carelessness on the part of the appellant CHA the unscrupulous person's attempted to export prohibited goods. Had the appellant been vigilant the attempted Red Sandalwood export could have been avoided. Accordingly the learned A.R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f Customs (General) as noted above. I further find that there is no finding to the effect that the appellant have indulged into any Act leading to an order of confiscation under the provisions of section 113. Further I find that order of confiscation is the condition precedent for imposition of penalty under Section 114(i). For reference the provisions of Section 114(i), is reproduced herein SECTION 114. Penalty for attempt to export goods improperly, etc. Any person who, in relation to any good .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version