Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Medical Engineers (I) Ltd., Varun Khurana And Raj K. Motwani Versus CC (Import) , Nhavasheva

Benefit of concessional rate of Customs duty under Notification No.21/2002-Cus - Benefit of CVD - whether the show-cause notice dated 16.3.2011 issued by the authorities for demanding the differential CVD along with interest and also for imposition of penalties to all appellants is hit by limitation or otherwise - Held that:- There is no answer as when the benefit of Notification 21/2002-Cus for the imported consignments was extended based upon the certificate issued by the Ministry of Environme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellant has suppressed any material fact from the Customs department, atleast in the case in hand.

Demand in question in the case in hand and consequent penalty imposed is incorrect as provisions of Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the proviso thereof, may not be applicable on the facts as recorded by us herein above. It has to be hold that the there was no suppression of material fact by the appellant; and Customs authorities have also erred in not noting that the imp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/CB - Dated:- 27-5-2015 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P.S. Pruthi, Member (Technical) For the Petitioner : Shri Bharat Raichandani, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri M.K. Sarangi, Asst. Commr (AR) ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran These appeals are directed against Orders-in-Original No. CAO/65/2011 dated 21.09.2013 and 107/2012 dated 28.09.2012. All these appeals are disposed of by a common order as the issue involved in these cases is arising out of the same impugned order. 2. The r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

carried out on the ground that there was evasion of customs duty by paying C.V.D on CNG kits and components on the transaction value are not on the retail sale price (RSP) as required under the provisions of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Entry No.108 of Notification No.49/2008-CE (NT) dated 24.12.2008. After recording various statements, show-cause notice dated 16.3.2011 was issued demanding differential C.V.D amounting to ₹ 73,16,285/- interest thereof and penaltie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

imported by them, for the cases in hand he would restrict the argument only to the limitation aspect. He would draw our attention to the fact that the bills of entries filed with the authorities correctly describes that the imported goods are CNG kits and components. He would submit that the assessment was a final assessment and along with documents they had submitted a certificate issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest (MOEF) indicated that imported goods are eligible for concessiona .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

C v. N.M.K. Jewellers - 2008 (225) ELT 3 (S.C.). He would also relied upon the judgement of the Tribunal in the case of CEV Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Jong Sung Kim v. CCE 2014-TIOL-796-CESTAT-DEL as also Jyanti Food Processing (P) Ltd. v. CCE - 2007 (215) ELT 327 SC. It is his submission that the impugned order be set aside. 4. Learned D.R. on the other hand, would submit that the imported items are specified under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Rules made thereunder as unit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lls of Entry without providing on the package any such declaration that the goods were to be sold on the declared MRP. It is also his submission that the appellants were aware of the fact that the goods are sold on MRP and for which purpose he draws our attention to the invoice issued by the appellant wherein it was indicated that the goods were sold as per MRP. It is his submission that the appellant cannot raise the bogey of limitation as having not declared the MRP on package subscribed to de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ition of penalties to all appellants is hit by limitation or otherwise. 6.1 The facts are not much in dispute inasmuch, there is an import of the goods during the material period August 2006 to July 2007 and are eligible for benefit of concessional rate of Customs duty under Notification No.21/2002-Cus and are liable for CVD. It is also undisputed that the appellant has paid the CVD on the transaction value which was declared by them to the customs authorities. There is also no dispute as to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icating that the goods imported by the appellant are eligible for benefit of exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. We have noticed that the certificate as issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest is consignment specific and all the consignments cleared during the period August 2006 to July 2007 were based upon such certificate given and filed before the customs authorities. It is to be noted that there is no dispute that all the bills of entries have been finally assessed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the assessing officer. If it is the claim of the Revenue that the appellant had not fixed the retail sale price on the imported package and those being non-compliance with Standards of Weights and Measures Act, it was also for the department to bring to the notice of the appellant that the goods were covered under the said Act and as per the provisions of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 they are liable to discharge of CVD on value of MRP/RSP. 6.5 Secondly, we find that there is no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version