Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) , Gurgaon Versus M/s Misty Meadows Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

2015 (11) TMI 1073 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Territorial jurisdiction to decide the appeal - Assessing Officer passed the assessment order based at Alwar and the first appeal was adjudicated by the CIT(A), Central Jaipur - Held that:- The matter is no longer res integra. This Court in Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Gurgaon v. M/s Parabolic Drugs Ltd. [2013 (1) TMI 565 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] following its earlier Division Bench judgment in The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/s Motorola India Ltd. [2007 (10) TMI 38 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ) against the order dated 19.12.2014 (Annexure-3) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) in C.O. No. 68/JP/2012, claiming the following substantial questions of law:- (i) Whether, in the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. ITAT was right in law in upholding the order of CIT(A) and dismissing th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962? (iv) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon'ble ITAT was legally justified in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,05,00,000/- and ₹ 14,01,765/- made u/s 68 of IT Act, 1961 by holding that the assessee has discharged the onus cast upon it u/s 68 of the Act while ignoring the facts that the initial evidences furnished by the assessee were duly rebutted by the Assessing Officer after making thorough enquiries and holding that the applican .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d deleting addition of ₹ 10,00,000/- on the basis of cross objection filed by the assessee whereas the said issue was not a part of revenue's appeal and as such, no cross objection could have been filed by the assessee and the issue could have been legally decided only on appeal filed by the assessee before the Tribunal against this addition? (vii) Whether the findings have been recorded by ITAT on misreading and misinterpretation of facts and evidence emanating on record? (viii) Wheth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Act was issued to the assessee who filed its return on 30.3.2010 for the assessment year 2003-04 declaring the total income at ₹ 1,22,320/-. Thereafter, notice dated 7.5.2010 under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) of the Act along with a questionnaire were issued to the assessee who filed reply to the same. The assessment order dated 15.12.2010 (Annexure- 1) under Section 143(3) of the Act was passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Alwar assessing the income of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version