Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-I Versus M/s. Abhinandan Investment Ltd.

Loss in respect of renunciation of rights to subscribe to partly convertible debentures (hereafter ‘PCD’) - according to the Revenue, the transaction was entered into solely for the purpose of contriving a loss - whether the transaction of renunciation of rights for subscribing to PCDs of JISCO was a colourable device to contrive an artificial loss? - Held that:- In the present case, the facts clearly indicative the transaction to be a part of a scheme, the sole purpose of which is to evade tax .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd the transaction had been implemented by JSL subscribing to the PCDs and in the circumstances, it could not be disputed that the transaction was genuine. It was contended that such transaction were permissible in law and, therefore, the tax effect of such transactions would necessarily follow. It was further contended on behalf of the Assessee that it is permissible for an Assessee to part with its asset with a view to book a loss. In our view, it cannot be disputed that in a case where an Ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

transactions, even though implemented, cannot be considered to be other than a colourable device for avoidance of tax.

In case the Assessee had actually paid the cum rights price of ₹ 625/- for purchase of the shares, the reduction in value of the shares on an ex-right basis would be duly reflected in the value of the closing stock. The Assessee not having paid the price of ₹ 625/- cannot claim a loss on account of a drop in its price. Surely, a trader cannot claim that h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the value of its shareholding in the same proportion as the drop in price of quoted shares. In other words, it could reduce the cost of shares of JISCO in the same proportion as the diminution in the value of the price of its shares on account of the shares being traded on an ex rights basis, that is, the cost of shares of JISCO could be reduced by applying a factor of 425/625 – ex-right price divided by cum-right price. - Decided against assessee.

Sale consideration received by tran .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of his holdings depending on the tax incidence in the year in question; in AY 1988-89 the Assessee reflected to shares of JISCO purchased in that year at below cost – treating them to be stock-in-trade and in AY 1992-93 sought to treat them as investments to avoid tax on the gains. None of the Assessee’s actions in the previous year 1991-92 indicated any change in the Assessee’s intention regarding its holding in shares and debentures. The ITAT observed that there were hardly any transactions i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee sold substantial shares and renounced rights to subscribe to PCDs contrary to its stated intention of holding the same on a long term basis.

In view of the above, the income received by the Assessee from sale of shares of JSL and the renunciation of rights to subscribe to the PCDs of JISCO was rightly held by the AO as business income and not income under the head capital gains. As discussed later, the Assessee could not have claimed any business income on account of renunciat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter ITAT ) in ITA No. 5425(Del)/94. The said appeal (ITA 5425(Del)/94) was preferred by the Assessee against an order dated 18th July, 1994 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereafter CIT(A) ] whereby the Assessee s appeal against an assessment order dated 22nd April, 1993, passed by the Assessing Officer (hereafter AO ) in respect of Assessment Year 1992-93, was rejected. 2. The controversy involved in the present case relates to a loss of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of ₹ 7,14,900/-). As against the aforesaid cost actually paid, the Assessee had claimed a cost of acquisition of rights entitlement to subscribe to PCDs at the rate of ₹ 200 per share of JISCO on the basis of which such rights were acquired. 3. According to the Revenue, the transaction was entered into solely for the purpose of contriving a loss by unjustifiably relying on a decision of the Supreme Court in Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia vs. CIT: (1967) 63 ITR 657 (SC). 4. The present appea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its entitlement to acquire partly convertible debentures and the assessee is entitled to set off the alleged loss from the capital gains/income earned by the assessee? 5. The present appeal was heard alongwith CIT v. M/s Sun Investments Ltd.: ITA 91/2002 and CIT v. M/s Stainless Investment Ltd.: ITA 305/2002 in respect of companies which also belong to the Jindal Group and where similar issues were involved. The learned counsel for the parties argued that the present appeal be considered as a le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r JSL ) and Saw Pipes Ltd. are among the principal manufacturing companies of the Jindal Group. In addition to the manufacturing concerns, Jindal Group also includes investment companies - such as the Assessee - which, inter alia, hold shares of the other manufacturing companies. 6.2 It is not disputed that the investment companies within the Group are under an overall common management and that the registered offices of some of the investment companies are located in residential flats occupied .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8377; 6 lacs was its income. This declaration was made under an amnesty scheme available at the material time. 6.3 During the initial assessment year i.e. AY 1984-85, the Assessee company made investments in shares of the following companies:- (i) JSL, 79,800 equity shares. (ii) Nalwa Steels Ltd., 50,000 equity shares (iii) JISCO 3,50,000 equity shares At the material time, the shares of the aforesaid companies were not quoted at the stock exchange. 6.4 The AO noted that in the previous year rel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

crores i.e. ₹ 280/- per share to JSL. 6.5 On 4th April, 1991 the Directors of the Assessee company passed a resolution to the effect that the shares and debentures held in various companies which were shown as stock-in-trade were to be now reflected as investment as the said securities were intended to be retained on a long term basis. 6.6 During the relevant financial year, the Assessee sold an aggregate of 60,000 (sixty thousand) equity shares of JSL for a consideration of ₹ 1,72,6 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of JISCO. The rights issue opened on 14th February, 1992. 6.8 The Assessee renounced its entitlement for subscribing to 1,29,688 PCDs in favour of JSL on 15th February, 1992 i.e. one day after the rights issue opened for subscription. 6.9 The shares of JISCO were quoted at a cum rights price of ₹ 625/- on 3rd January, 1992 and were quoted at ₹ 425/- per share ex rights on 6th January, 1992. 6.10 On the basis of the aforesaid drop in prices, the Assessee claimed that the cost of acqu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at ₹ 200 per share. 6.11 The AO noted that the consideration for renunciation of rights had not been received in the financial year. The AO further noted that the renunciation of right forms was quoted on the stock exchange at a price ranging from ₹ 260 to ₹ 280 per PCD and, thus, had concluded that the sale was made below the market price. 6.12 The AO had noted that the sale proceeds received by the Assessee for sale of shares held by the Assessee in JSL during the relevant p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duce the taxable profits, these companies had renounced rights to subscribe to securities in favour of other companies belonging to the same group at a price much below the market value and, further, on the basis of the notional cost of acquisition, claimed a loss which was sought to be set off from the profits earned from the sale of shares of JSL, JISCO and/or Saw Pipes Ltd. The AO noted that the Assessee could not provide any reason for selling the rights to subscribe to PCDs at below the mar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he stock-in-trade to investments; further renunciation of rights at below the market price; and the renunciation of rights to subscribe PCDs were sham transactions to purchase losses. He also concluded that the transactions were not in aid of the Assessee s business or its stated object of holding investments on a long term basis. 6.14 Aggrieved by the assessment made by the AO, the Assessee appealed before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) rejected the appeals of the Assessee and held that it was amply cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oss claimed by the Assessee on the renunciation of rights to subscribe to PCDs of JISCO was allowed to be set off against the profits made by the Assessee. The ITAT was of the view that the shares of JSL or JISCO held by the Assessee were investments and not trading assets. Consequently, it held that the Assessee was entitled to compute the cost of acquisition of rights to subscribe to PCDs in accordance with the Supreme Court s decision in Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia (supra). The ITAT further held th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ISCO. Submissions 7. Mr Rohit Madan, Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue contended that the Tribunal had grossly erred in not appreciating that the AO had found the transactions to be a device to evade tax. He further pointed out that although the ITAT had observed that the Assessee had sold the shares of JSL as it was interested in subscribing to the rights issue floated by JISCO, the facts indicated quite to the contrary. He submitted that admittedly the Assessee had not subscribed to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as on 31st March, 1992 solely for the purpose of taking benefit of the decision of the Supreme Court in Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia (supra). He contended that the shares in question had been held by the Assessee as stock-in-trade and the resolution to transfer them to investments was taken only once the Assessee contemplated sale of the said shares. He contended that this was apparent from the fact that the shares in JSL were sold within the same financial year - FY 1991-92. He argued that the resolut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enunciation of rights to subscribe to the PCDs of JISCO. He contended that whether the shares in question were held as stock-in-trade or as investments, the Assessee would, in either case, be entitled to claim the loss on renunciation of its rights to subscribe to the PCDs of JISCO. He relied upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. K.A. Patch: (1971) 81 ITR 413 (Bom) in support of his contention that the method of calculation of loss on renunciation of rights would remain the same e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

had been exercised by JSL and JSL had subscribed to the PCDs of JISCO which were subsequently issued and registered in the name of JSL. He earnestly argued that in the circumstances, the transaction of sale of rights in question could not be considered as a paper or a sham transaction. He referred to the decision of the Madras High Court in M.V. Valliappan v, ITO: (1988) 170 ITR 238 (Mad) in support of its contention that the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in McDowell (supra) were no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

action was held to be a sham transaction, then the consideration received by the Assessee also ought to have been reduced from the profits declared by the Assessee. Mr Vohra conceded that this argument had not been urged by the Assessee in the alternative at any stage - neither before the AO nor at any later stage - as the Assessee was consistently canvassing that the transaction in question was a genuine transaction. Reasoning and Conclusion Question No.(i) 12. The first question relates to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and ₹ 82.55 lacs as stock-in-trade. According to the Assessee, the Board of Directors had on 4th April, 1991 decided to retain the investments held as stock-in-trade on a long term basis and accordingly passed a resolution to that effect. The relevant extract from the minutes of the meeting held on 4th April, 1991 is as under:- RESOLVED THAT the shares and debentures of ₹ 82,55,810/- (Rupees eighty two lakhs fifty thousand eight hundred ten only) held by the company as stock-in-trade .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sham. According to him, the said claim was designed to evade tax due on income from sale of shares of JSL and further claim a loss on renunciation of rights to subscribe to PCDs of JISCO. The Assessee s contention that it was entitled to claim a business loss on account of sale of rights to subscribe to PCDs of JISCO by following the method of computing cost of acquisition as approved by the Supreme Court in Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia (supra) was also rejected by the AO. The CIT(A) also upheld the d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o AY 1991-92. It is also relevant to note that the Assessee had purchased 7500 shares of JISCO in the financial year relevant to the assessment year 1988-89 for a consideration of ₹ 1,35,000/- which was reflected as a part of the closing stock at a value of ₹ 97,500/-. Thus, it appears that the Assessee had booked a loss for the AY 1988-89 on account of the difference in the purchase value and the value at which the closing stock had been valued. This would be impermissible if the As .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ded on the basis that it was always the intention of the Assessee to hold the shares in question as investments and not to trade in them. In our view, this is unsustainable because the Assessee had itself reflected the shares in question as stock-in-trade. The Assessee had also further valued the closing stock at cost or market value, whichever was lower; undisputedly, this treatment could only be accorded to shares held as stock-in-trade and not as investment. It appears that the Assessee had a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ia, engaged in sale and purchase of shares. The resolution purportedly passed by the Board of Directors of the Assessee on 4th April, 1991 also recorded that the shares and debentures valued at cost or market value, whichever is lower as on 31st March 1991 be transferred from stock-in-trade to investments. Thus, it was not the Assessee s case that the said shares be treated as investments from the date they were purchased but were to be retained as investments after the date of the purported res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8. First of all, it is necessary to note that although the resolution dated 4th April, 1991 specifically stated that the shares and debentures of ₹ 82,55,810/- be transferred to investments in the Balance Sheet as on 31st March, 1992; 60,000 shares of JSL were sold in August 1991, that is, within a few months after the passing of the purported resolution and much prior to the end of the financial year. Thus, the said 60,000 shares of JSL, which were reflected as stock-in-trade, were never .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lear import being that the shareholding was fictitious and undisclosed income of the promoters. 19. In the above circumstances, the AO was rightly skeptical as to the resolution dated 4th April, 1991 and found it necessary to examine the actions of the Assessee. It was at once apparent that the actions of the Assessee were not in conformity with the purported resolution dated 4th April, 1991. Whilst the resolution indicated that the Board of Directors had decided to retain the shares and debentu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s but substantial amounts were advanced to JSL. The AO also noted that sale transactions entered during the year in question involved the maximum amount since the incorporation of the Assessee. 20. It is also relevant to note that the Assessee further acquired 40,000 shares of JISCO in July 1992, that is, within a few months of selling its rights to subscribe to the PCDs - and consequently acquire the shares of JISCO - at a fraction of the market value. These shares were purchased at the rate of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were sold to raise funds to enable the Assessee to subscribe to the rights issue of PCDs of JISCO and held as under: The reasons for selling these shares were that assessee company became entitled to subscription to the convertible debentures of JISCO. Each debenture issued by JISCO was for a sum of ₹ 110/- and an investment in debentures would have involved approximate of ₹ 1.5. Crore and if the assessee company would not have sold its 60,000 shares, then the company has to part awa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onclusion. This was also contrary to the statement of the Assessee s director who was examined by the AO. Most importantly, the Assessee did not utilize the sale proceeds of 60,000 JSL shares (Rs.1,72,60,000/-) to subscribe to the PCDs of JISCO but sold the rights to JSL for a fraction of its value. The ITAT also failed to appreciate the reasons that had prompted the AO and the CIT(A) to hold that the shares of JSL and JISCO could not be considered as investments. 23. The Assessee appears to hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e were hardly any transactions in the past and on that basis concluded that the Assessee was in substance an investment company. However, the ITAT failed to appreciate that the Assessee had consciously held itself out as a company engaged in sale and purchase of shares; it was also assessed on the income earned from business and also claimed deduction on account of business expenses incurred by the Assessee. The shares in question were, concededly, held as stock-in-trade. All that happened in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e on account of renunciation of rights to subscribe to the PCDs. 25. The first question is, accordingly, answered in affirmative, in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee. 26. There is yet another aspect of the matter that requires to be noted. Assuming arguendo that the Assessee s claim that it had transferred shares and debentures from stock-in-trade to investment during the year in question is accepted; even then, the Assessee could not claim the gains from sale of shares of JSL as l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), but does not include- (i) any stock-in-trade [other than the securities referred to in sub-clause (b)]], consumable stores or raw materials held for the purposes of his business or profession; xxx 28. Undisputedly, the Assessee had held the shares in question as stockin- trade prior to 4th April, 1991 and had claimed that it had decided to retain the shares and debentures as investments thereafter. In the circumstance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vestment. The conversion of stock-in-trade into investments would not immediately yield any business income/loss as an Assessee cannot be held to trade with itself [see: Kikabhai Premchand v. CIT: (1953) 24 ITR 506 (SC)]. However, it is possible to contend that once the asset is sold, the income or loss resulting therefrom would subsume within it the business income/loss at the time of conversion from stock-in-trade to capital asset. Thus, in the year in which the asset is sold, the income/loss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e must add that none of the counsel addressed any arguments on this issue. In the circumstances we do not consider it appropriate to finally decide the same and leave the question open to be decided in an appropriate case. Question No. (ii) 30. The second question relates to whether the Assessee could claim that it has incurred a loss on the sale of its right to subscribe to the PCDs of JISCO and further set off the said loss against the other income from capital gains. 31. First and foremost, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its market value. Further, the Assessee had also not received the consideration for same within the relevant financial year. Clearly, if the business purpose of the Assessee was to sell one of its assets, it would have done so at the best possible price and terms. However, in the present case, the Assessee had chosen not to do so. In the circumstances, the AO had called upon the Assessee to explain the reason for transferring its rights at below the market price but had received no response to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Assessee had not subscribed to those shares but had also renounced its rights in favour of JSL. There is no explanation provided by the Assessee whatsoever for entering into this transaction. 34. It is important to note that the aforesaid transaction had not resulted in any real loss to the Assessee. Admittedly the price paid by the Assessee for purchase of shares of JISCO was less than the consideration received by the Assessee (Rs.30/- per PCD) for renouncing its rights to subscribe to PCD .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a separate matter; but, in our view, it cannot be disputed that such loss could at best be described as notional. 35. The transaction of renunciation of rights in favour of JSL ensured that the right to subscribe remained within the group. Thus, looking at the transaction at a group level, it is apparent that the right to subscribe to the PCDs and consequently acquire further shares of JISCO was not alienated and remained within the Jindal Group. 36. It is also necessary to note that several co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it was open for the Assessee to enter into such transactions to mitigate its tax liability. However, we are not persuaded to accept this contention. 38. It is now well established that although tax planning is permissible but a colorable device to avoid payment of tax would be impermissible. Justice Chinnappa Reddy in his concurring opinion in Mcdowell (supra) had held that in our view the proper way to construe a taxing statute, while considering a device to avoid tax, is not to ask whether the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial benediction . Justice Ranganath Misra speaking for the majority held that tax planning may be legitimate provided it is within the framework of law. Colourable devices cannot be part of tax planning and it is wrong to encourage or entertain the belief that it is honourable to avoid the payment of tax by resorting to dubious method. It is the obligation of every citizen to pay the taxes honestly without resorting to subterfuges . 39. The decision of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce Chinnappa Reddy was a far cry from the majority opinion and further concluded that the decision in Mcdowell (supra) cannot be read as laying down that every attempt at tax planning was illegitimate and must be ignored. 40. The Supreme Court in Azadi Bachao Andolan (supra) approved the following passage from the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Banyan and Berry v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: (1996) 222 ITR 831 (Guj):- The court nowhere said that every action or inaction on the part of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s which lead to McDowell s decision leave us in no doubt that the principle enunciated in the above case has not affected the freedom of the citizen to act in a manner according to his requirements, his wishes in the manner of doing any trade, activity or planning his affairs with circumspection, within the framework of law, unless the same fall in the category of colourable device which may properly be called a device or a dubious method or a subterfuge clothed with apparent dignity. 41. Indisp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by him. 42. In Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sakarlal Balabhai: (1968) 69 ITR 186 (Guj), the Gujarat Court explained the meaning of tax avoidance and observed that Tax avoidance postulates that the assessee is in receipt of amount which is really and in truth his income liable to tax but on which he avoids payment of tax by some artifice or device..... . The Court further explained that such artifice or device may assume diverse forms but there must be some artifice or device enabling the Asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of shares of a non-resident holding company which resulted in transferring the controlling interest in downstream Indian subsidiary, was a device to evade tax. In that context, the Supreme Court observed that whether a transaction is used principally as a colourable device for the distribution of earnings, profits and gains, is determined by a review of all the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction . The Court held that if an actual controlling Non-Resident Enterprise (NRE) makes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

clusion that the corporate structure was not created for avoidance of tax but for other genuine business purposes. 45. It follows from the aforesaid decision that in order to examine whether a transaction is a device or a subterfuge the answer to the question whether the transaction has any reasonable business purpose would be a vital consideration. Clearly, the use of corporate form to evade tax would be impermissible and it is, thus, necessary in the facts of the present case to look at the tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed into transactions for renunciation of rights with related companies of the same group. These incestuous transactions were for no other business purpose but to contrive a loss in the hands of the companies such as the Assessee who had incurred a tax liability on account of the gains made. It is claimed that the transactions of sale of rights entitlement had resulted in a tax loss, although no real loss had been incurred by these companies inasmuch as the consideration received for sale of righ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t a fraction of its market value. Viewed from the perspective that all companies were related and a part of the Jindal Group, the rights to subscribe to PCDs were not alienated and remained within the Group. The corporate structure of the entities within the group was used for contriving the transactions which would conjure a tax loss in the hands of the companies - including the Assessee - which had incurred a tax liability. 46. In Azadi Bachao Andolan (supra), the Supreme Court had cautioned t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of creating. Clearly, the colourable device or a sham transaction would include a transaction and device which purport to show a situation which is much different from the substance of the transaction. In the present case, the transaction of sale of rights entitlement purports to indicate an alienation of a right while in fact at a group level, there has been no alienation of any rights. The transactions have been so executed to ensure that the rights remained within the Jindal Group. The regi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee had in fact relinquished its rights to subscribe to PCDs and the transaction had been implemented by JSL subscribing to the PCDs and in the circumstances, it could not be disputed that the transaction was genuine. It was contended that such transaction were permissible in law and, therefore, the tax effect of such transactions would necessarily follow. It was further contended on behalf of the Assessee that it is permissible for an Assessee to part with its asset with a view to book a loss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the group. This would be an abuse of the corporate form and such transactions, even though implemented, cannot be considered to be other than a colourable device for avoidance of tax. 48. As explained by the Supreme Court in Vodafone International Holdings B.V. (supra) the question whether a scheme is a colourable or an artificial device would have to be considered in the context of the surrounding facts. In the present case, the facts clearly indicative the transaction to be a part of a scheme, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rights entitlement to be a sham or a colourable device. We are also unable to accept this argument as no such contention was advanced even before the CIT(A) or the ITAT. The Assessee had simply declared profits as per its profit and loss account for charge of tax no claim for rendering the profits had been made and there is no reason for the AO to reduce the same. No alternative arguments had been advanced before the AO. The Assessee had claimed a notional capital loss which the AO found to be c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he same. 51. The Assessee has relied upon the decision in the case of Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia (supra) to contend that the Assessee could calculate its income/ loss from renunciation of rights to subscribe to PCDs of JISCO by claiming the cost of acquisition of the rights entitlement as the difference in cum-right price and an ex-right price of shares of JISCO. It has also been contended that the method of computation of cost of acquisition as approved by the Supreme Court in Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

value of ₹ 75 and a premium of ₹ 30). Thus, the Assessee - who was not a dealer in the shares - became entitled to subscribe to 710 ordinary shares of TISCO. She did not subscribe to her entitlement but sold her entitlement to subscribe 710 shares of TISCO for a consideration of ₹ 45,262.50/-. It is important to note that there was no dispute between the Assessee and the Revenue that the amount received was taxable as capital gains. It is, in those circumstances, that the Court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st of acquisition of the rights and the same was accepted. The contention of the Revenue that the cost of acquisition should be taken as Nil was rejected as the Court held that the Assessee would suffer some loss in the value of her existing shareholding by reason of increase in the issued share capital of TISCO. It was necessary to determine the cost of acquisition of the rights entitlement for the capital gains to be computed. It is also relevant to bear in mind that in a later case, CIT v. B. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

accepted the Assessee s contention and held that the principles accepted by the Supreme Court for determining the cost of acquisition of a rights entitlement for the purposes of computing capital gains would also be applicable for computing business profits. We, respectfully, are unable to concur with this view for several reasons. First of all, for the reason that the commercial and accounting principles for computing trading income/loss are materially different from the principles that may be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubsumed in his trading account, which is mandatorily required to be drawn up. It is neither necessary nor an accounting practice to determine profit and loss on each piece of trading asset that is sold. Therefore, there is no necessity or occasion for trader to separately determine the cost of acquisition of each item of goods sold by him; he is only required to prepare a trading account while reflecting the aggregate sales and purchases. Thus, in a case of a trader, the principle of ascertainin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unting practices. Typically, a trading account would include Opening Stock, which would be the same as the Closing Stock of the preceding year and would be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower. The purchases made during the year would also be debited to the trading account. All revenues earned by the Assessee as well as the closing stock would be reflected as a credit in the trading account. The closing stock would be the stock-in-trade in the hands of the Assessee as on the closin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

count. The cost incurred by the Assessee would be naturally subsumed in the value of the closing stock, assuming that the shares on the basis of which rights entitlement has been granted to an Assessee are still retained by him at the end of the closing period. In the present case, the Assessee has, admittedly, credited the income from sale of rights entitlement in the Profit and Loss Account. Undisputedly, all costs incurred by the Assessee as well as the value of closing stock have also been t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has also been audited. In our view, there is no scope to provide for a deduction of notional business loss which is neither incurred by the Assessee nor recorded in its audited books of accounts on the basis of notional costs of acquisition which are neither incurred by the Assessee, nor form a part of its audited accounts. In our view, it would be erroneous to impute notional cost after the Assessee has drawn up its Profit and Loss Account in accordance with the mandatory accounting standards .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: import purchase

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version