Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Ganpati Rollings Pvt. Ltd. And M/s. Bombay Metal Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi

Excess material found during search in the premises of Job worker - appellant has not recorded the excess goods in their statutory records - contravention of the provisions of Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Confiscation of goods - Imposition of redemption fine and penalties - Held that:- On plain reading of the said Rule, the Rule is applicable when the assessee takes Cenvat Credit on inputs/ capital goods. The facts of the case are suc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntral Excise Act, 1944.

Provisions of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules 2002 cannot be invoked for confiscation of the goods in the subject matter as held by this Tribunal in the case of BMW Steels Ltd. (2010 (10)885 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI) and in the case of Sadashiv Ispat Ltd. (2010 (1)500 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT). Therefore, I hold that the provisions of Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 are not applicable to the facts of cases in hand .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpugned order holding the goods liable for confiscation. Consequently, the redemption fine and penalties were imposed. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellants before me are job worker and are engaged in the activity of conversion of copper ingots into copper wire rods. They are procuring goods or raw materials job worker challan under Rule 4(5) A of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and after processing, the goods were cleared to the principal manufacturer. On 27.6.2007, a search was conducted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts. Same were adjudicated holding that appellant has contravened the provisions of Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Therefore, the goods are liable for confiscation and consequently, the redemption fine and penalty were imposed. Aggrieved from the said order appellant is before me. 3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that facts of the case are not in dispute. He submits that the provisions attracted for confiscation for the goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Pepsi Foods vs. CCE [2002 (139) ELT 658 (Tri-Del)]; CCE vs. BMW Steels Ltd. [2011 (272) ELT 315 (Tri-Del)]; and CCE vs. Sadashiv Ispat Ltd. [2010 (255) ELT 349 (P&H). 4. On the other hand, learned AR reiterated the finding of the impugned order and submits that it is not in dispute that at the time of investigation raw material as well as finished goods were found in excess and not recorded in the statutory records. Therefore, the provisions of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 are ri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rules are applicable to the facts of this case or not. For better appreciation, Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is extracted herein below:- [RULE 15. Confiscation and penalty. - (1) If any person, takes or utilises CENVAT credit in respect of input or capital goods or input services, wrongly or in contravention of any of the provisions of these rules, then, all such goods shall be liable to confiscation and such person, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding the duty or service tax .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rms of the provisions of section 11AC of the Excise Act. (3) In a case, where the CENVAT credit in respect of input or capital goods or input services has been taken or utilised wrongly by reason of fraud, collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions of these rules or of the Finance Act or of the rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of service tax, then, the provider of output service shall also be liable to pay penalty in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the facts of the case as appellant have not taken any cenvat credit either wrongly or in contravention of the provisions of any Rule. Therefore, I hold that goods in question are not to be held liable for confiscation under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. 8. The provisions of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 were also attracted for confiscation of the goods in question. The provisions of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 are extracted hereinbelow:- RULE 25. Confiscation and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version