Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Ahmedabad Circle-3, Ahmedabad Versus Anagram Capital Ltd. (Formerly known as Anagram Securities Ltd) , Edelweiss Financial Advisors Ltd (Formerly known as Anagram Capital Ltd) Versus ACIT, Ahmedabad Circle-3, Ahmedabad

Addition of NSE penalty - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT(A) follows case law of ITO vs. GDB Share and Stock Broking Services Ltd. [2003 (8) TMI 169 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C] in deciding the very issue in assessee’s favour. The Revenue fails to point out any distinction on facts or law before us. It does not quote any case law to the contrary. This first ground accordingly fails. - Decided against revenue

Section 36(1)(iii) interest disallowance - CIT(A) deleted the addition - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on - Held that:- Sale/purchase price of shares had been credited in the respective accounts. The CIT(A) follows special bench decision of DCIT vs. Shreyas S. Morakhia [2010 (7) TMI 455 - ITAT MUMBAI] that value of the share transacted by a broker-assessee on behalf of the concerned client is very much allowable as bad debts. The Revenue fails to rebut this legal position.- Decided against revenue

Brokerage rebate disallowance - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Assessee’s gros .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt. It has come on record that it is in stock broking business. It has accordingly offered the impugned rebate of ₹ 34,67,507/- in business expediency. We do not find any ground to interfere with the lower appellate findings under challenge. - Decided against revenue

Section 14A disallowance - Held that:- When there is no net interest expenditure upon setting off interest credited to P&L account, no part of interest debited is to be disallowed as attributable to earning of exemp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent u/s 43B(f) - Held that:- . The assessee submits to have paid leave encashment of ₹ 19,439/- as on 04.09.2008 and ₹ 19,661/- on 24.09.2008. There is no dispute about the above stated facts as well as the legal background of the issue. We follow the hon’ble apex court Bharat Earth Movers vs. CIT, [2000 (8) TMI 4 - SUPREME Court ]order in these facts and direct the assessing authority in the same terms as indicated therein. - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes.. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

NSE lease line charges, NSE VSAT charges and MTNL expenses - Held that:- In recent decision of CIT vs. Ansal Landmark Townships Pvt Ltd, (2015 (9) TMI 79 - DELHI HIGH COURT) held that when a deductor-assessee is not an assessee in default u/s 201(1), it is deemed that it has deducted and paid the tax on such sums on the date of filing of return of income by the concerned payee as referred in the above stated proviso. We accordingly remit this issue back to the Assessing Officer for carrying out .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ondent : Shri Vijay Ranjan, AR ORDER Per Shri S. S. Godara, Judicial Member These cross appeals filed by the Revenue and assessee for AY 2008- 09, arise from order of the CIT(A)-XVI, Ahmedabad, dated 28.04.2011 passed in case no.CIT(A)-XVI/AC.Cir.3/710/10-11, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in short the Act . 2. We come to Revenue s appeal ITA No.1531/Ahd/2014. Its first ground challenges the lower appellate order deleting disallowance / addition of NSE penalty o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The CIT(A) follows caselaw 88 TTJ 352 (Kol), ITO vs. GDB Share and Stock Broking Services Ltd., in deciding the very issue in assessee s favour. The Revenue fails to point out any distinction on facts or law before us. It does not quote any case law to the contrary. This first ground accordingly fails. 2. The second substantive ground seeks to restore section 36(1)(iii) interest disallowance of ₹ 4,61,573/-. The Assessing Officer noticed assessee s interest expenditure paid of ₹ 1,0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

met on behalf of these entities to be lacking any business purpose in absence of details being filed. The Assessing Officer was further of the view that such reimbursements could not be taken as loans/advances. He cited lack of details qua the advances in question of ₹ 32,03,147/-. And observed that assessee had paid huge interest sums on the one hand and advanced its interest bearing funds without charging interest to above stated entities. This would make the Assessing Officer to compute .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y support Assessing Officer s action. It transpires from the case file that assessee s interest free funds as on 31.03.2008 read a figure of ₹ 1,25,83,17,835/- in the nature of share capital, reserves and surplus etc. It files tribunal s order in its own case for AY 2004-05 in ITA No.1890/Ahd/2007 decided on 19.12.2008 deciding the very issue in its favour in identical circumstances. We follow suit in these facts and reject this Revenue s ground as well. 4. The Revenue s third substantive .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

come u/s 36(2) of the Act in profit and loss account. He accordingly made the impugned disallowance of this bad debts claim. 5. The CIT(A) deletes this bad debts disallowance after quoting case law of TRF Ltd. Vs. CIT, 323 ITR 397 (SC) to the fact that it is not necessary to prove the same to have actually become bad as per the relevant law amended from 01.04.1989. The CIT(A) comes to latter aspect (supra). The assessee submitted in the lower appellate proceedings that it had already credited it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s to rebut this legal position. We reject this third substantive ground accordingly. 6. This leaves us with the Revenue s forth and last substantive ground seeking to restore brokerage rebate disallowance of ₹ 34,67,507/-. This sum represents assessee s rebate to its client on the ground that the brokerage rate charged was found to be more than that agreed, the same was reduced in order to retain the clientele and it is a volume-base promotion scheme by following commercial expediency. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ledger account of the clients. The assessee s ledger balance in this regard was found to be accordingly reduced in all cases. All this results in deletion of the impugned disallowance. 8. We have heard both the parties. It transpires from pages 91 to 102 of the paper-book that assessee s gross brokerage income is of ₹ 59,23,26,790/-. The corresponding brokerage refund figure in question is @ 0.59% of this gross income. The relevant segments are cash and F&O of ₹ 9,06,412.88 and & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he lower appellate findings under challenge. This forth and last ground is also rejected. Revenue s appeal ITA No.1531/Ahd/2011 is dismissed. 9. We advert to assessee s appeal ITA No.1718/Ahd/2011. Its first ground challenges Section 14A disallowance of ₹ 15,50,074/-. Its exempt income from dividends reads a figure of ₹ 11,67,255/- arising from investment of ₹ 3,37,75,313/- in shares of M/s. Arvind Mills Ltd. with long term investment in shares of its subsidiary amounting to &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/-. The CIT(A) confirms Assessing Officer s action. 10. The Assessee states in the course of hearing that its interest free funds as on 31.03.2008 are of ₹ 1,25,83,17,836/- in the nature of share capital, reserves and surplus etc. Corresponding investments giving raise to the impugned exempt income are of ₹ 3,37,75,313/-. Much less than the interest free funds. It is evident that assessee s exempt income in relevant previous year is of ₹ 12.56 crores (Page 27 of the paper-book) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The Revenue does not point out any exception thereto. We accordingly delete the interest disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) of ₹ 13,81,198/- (supra). Coming to administrative expenses disallowance of ₹ 1,68,877/- under Rule 8D(2)(iii), the assessee fails to dispute correctness thereof since the impugned assessment year is 2008- 09. This latter disallowance figure is confirmed. This ground is partly allowed. 11. The second substantive ground challenges disallowance of provision made fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

08 directing the said assessee to pay tax as if the above said statutory provision duly stood in the Act and also holding it entitled to raise the very claim simultaneously. He disallowed the impugned leave encashment claim accordingly. The CIT(A) upholds the same. 12. We have heard rival contentions. The assessee submits to have paid leave encashment of ₹ 19,439/- as on 04.09.2008 and ₹ 19,661/- on 24.09.2008. There is no dispute about the above stated facts as well as the legal bac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is not an eligible asset u/s 32 of the Act as held by hon ble Bombay high court in M/s. Technoshares and Stocks Ltd. Vs. CIT 193 Taxman 248. The CIT(A) observes that the hon ble apex court has reversed the above stated decision as reported in 327 ITR 323 with a rider that the same relates to Bombay Stock Exchange card only. He reproduces relevant portion of this judgment as well. However, the Revenue fails to point out any distinction between the assessee s Ahmedabad Stock Exchange card and rele .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

News: Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters

News: Clarification about Transition Credit

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version