Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ITO, Ward-5 (2) , New Delhi Versus Smt. Kavita Behal

Penalty u/s. 271D and 271E - numerous cash deposits and repayment was made in cash - CIT(A) deleted the penalty - Held that:- There is nothing to indicate that the amount received and repayment is a loan or unaccounted for. It is entered in the accounts duly maintained by both. In fact, the purpose for which the said amount was received is also clear from the material on record and therefore, there is nothing to indicate that this amount is paid as loan or deposit. Find considerable cogency in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he real exigency of taking the cash loans.

CIT(A) has rightly observed that assessee has demonstrated the funds were arranged in cash on urgent requirement of the business which is in accordance with commercial expediency of assessee’s business which was being closed during the year as the remaining stock of cloth was being sold to clear the outstanding of the business by paying the outstanding creditors and as a result, the assessee has undergone a financial crisis, hence, Ld. CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elevant to assessment years 2009-10. Since the issues involved in both the appeals are identical, hence, these appeals are being consolidated by this common order for the sake of convenience, by dealing with ITA No. 6528/Del/2013. 2. The following grounds have been raised in ITA No. 6528/Del/2013 (AY 2009-10) :- 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the penalty u/s. 271D of the I.T. Act, 1961 of ₹ 27,01,600/-. 2. That the ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erroneous and is not tenable on facts and in law. 3. That the appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or forgo any ground(s) of the appeal raised above at the time of the hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed her return of income on 30.07.2009 declaring an income of ₹ 1,78,400/-. The case was fixed for scrutiny and the assessment was completed on 30.12.2011 at an income of ₹ 1,78,400/-. As per A.O. assessee is maintaining the bank accounts and in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cause notice for penalty u/s 271D and passed an ex-parte order dated 27.09.2012 u/s 271D of the Act imposing the penalty of ₹ 27,01,600/-. 5. Against the above penalty order, the Assessee appealed before the Ld. CIT(A), who vide impugned order dated 6.9.2013 has allowed the appeal of the assessee and delete the penalty in dispute. 6. Aggrieved with the Ld. CIT(A) s Order dated 6.9.2013, Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. 7. Ld. DR relied upon the order of the Assessing Officer and f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lso relied upon the following cases laws and stated that the present case of the assessee is squarely covered by these case laws:- (a) Kamen Jaswantlal Shah vs. ITO {2012) 19 Taxmann.com 99 (Ahd.) - ITAT, Ahmedabad (b) CIT vs. Sree Krishna Promoters & Builders [2011] 16 taxmann.com 138 (Kar.) - High Court of Karnataka (c) CIT vs. Shivalik Loha Mills Ltd. - 2007-TIOL-75-HCP& H-IT (d) CIT vs. Bangalore Leather & Leather Crafts Ltd. [2012] 19 taxmann.com 21 (Kar.) (e) CIT vs. Lakshmi Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

asthan High Court. (l) DCIT vs. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav [2012] 26 taxmann.com 264 (Agra Tribunal) (m) Bright Play Centre vs. Addl. CIT 2011-TIOL-712-ITATAHM (n) OMEC Engineers vs. CIT [2007] 294 ITR 599 (Jhar) (o) CIT vs. T. Perumal (Indl.) [2015] 370 ITR 313 (Mad.) (p) CIT vs. Speedways Rubber Pvt. Ltd. [2010] 326 ITR 31 (P&H). 9. I have heard both the parties and perused the relevant records, especially the orders of the revenue authorities as well as the case laws cited by both the parties. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rovides that no penalty shall be imposable on a person or an assessee, as the case may be, for any failure referred to in the said provision if the assessee proves that there was a reasonable cause for such failure. In other words, penalty is not automatic under section 271D on mere violations of provisions of section 269SS.The words reasonable cause' have not been defined under the Act, but they could receive the same interpretation which is given to the expression 'sufficient cause' .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

easonable cause failed to comply with the provisions. While considering reasonableness one should keep in mind commercial expediency and object of the section for which it was inserted. It is to see whether the transaction is in accordance with commercial expediency. If I see the facts of the case under consideration in consolidated way, I noticed that the assessee has demonstrated the funds were arranged in cash on urgent requirement of the business which is in accordance with commercial expedi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s passed without any adverse inference and the returned income was accepted without any additions or disallowances. From the facts of the case, we find that the assessee took small amounts of money from time to time and repaid back in small amounts was in accordance with commercial expediency of assessee's business as the demand of business of the assessee was such at that point of time. The bona fide transactions of the assessee carried out in accordance with commercial expediency and busin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the said amount was received is also clear from the material on record and therefore there is nothing to indicate that this amount is paid as loan or deposit. In the absence of such material on record keeping in mind the relationship between the parties the nature of transaction coupled with the fact that the assessee was undergoing a financial difficulty, if. I do not see any merit in this appeal. 8. I therefore, delete the penalty of ₹ 27,01,600/- levied by the AO u/s. 27lD of the Act. 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Notification: Seeks to exempt goods imported for organising FIFA under 17, world cup, 2017

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: INELIGIBLE INPUT TAX CREDIT UNDER GST REGIME

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Article: All about E-way Bill under GST

Highlight: Provision for sick leave liability - based on the basis of notional figures - such notional liability cannot be allowed as deduction - section 43B(f) is not applicable.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version