Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ROLEX RINGS PVT LTD & 1 Versus UNION OF INDIA & 3

Waiver of pre-deposit - Confiscation of exported goods - Classification of machined rigs - Classification under Chapter Sub-heading 84829900 or under Drawback tariff item No. 848221 - Held that:- Appellate Tribunal had thought it fit to direct pre-deposit of ₹ 48,03,301/- as against the demand of excess drawback of ₹ 2,71,78,810/-, whereas the Commissioner (Appeals) has thought it fit to direct the petitioners to pre-deposit ₹ 24,00,000/- and ₹ 10,00,000/- in relation to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rits of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), as pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the classification issue which is involved in the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) stands concluded by an order dated 29.10.2015 of the Appellate Tribunal in favour of the petitioners. Under the circumstances, the petitioners have a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.

When the court has found merit in the case of the petitioners and the matter does not involve a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8509 of 2015 - Dated:- 5-11-2015 - MS. HARSHA DEVANI AND MR. A.G.URAIZEE, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR PARESH V SHETH, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS : MRS VD NANAVATI, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1. Rule. Mrs. V. D. Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. Having regard to the controversy involved in the present case which lies in a very narrow compass, the matter is taken up for fin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nst the petitioners holding that the machined rings for bearings manufactured and exported by the first petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner ) should be classified under Chapter Sub-heading 84829900 of the Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1962; that the machined rings for bearings manufactured and exported by the petitioner should be classified under Drawback tariff item No. 848221 of the Drawback Schedule; that the gear blanks manufactured and exported by the petitioner shou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

confirmed the demand and ordered recovery of excess drawback aggregating ₹ 48,03,301/- and imposed penalty of an equal amount on the petitioner under the proviso to section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. A penalty of ₹ 20,00,000/- also came to be imposed on the Managing Director of the petitioner, that is the second petitioner herein. 5. Being aggrieved, the petitioners carried the matter in appeal before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad, who, by an order dated 01 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the petitioners, thereafter, moved an application requesting the Commissioner (Appeals) to waive the pre-deposit. By an order dated 16.01.2015, the Commissioner (Appeals) found that the petitioners had not put forth any new or valid reasons which warrant reconsideration of the order dated 01.01.2015. He, accordingly, maintained the stay order and directed the first petitioner to pre-deposit ₹ 24,00,000/- and the second petitioner to pre-deposit ₹ 10,00,000/- towards penalty in r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o adjudicated a show cause notice for the period from 01.01.2011 to 30.09.2012, which came to be challenged before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Tribunal ). Along with the appeal, the petitioners had also filed the stay application for stay of recovery of the duty confirmed and the penalty imposed. The Tribunal, by an order dated 21.07.2011 (Annexure O to the petition), had in relation to the amount of excess availed drawback of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the demand of ₹ 2,71,78,810/-, thought it fit to direct pre-deposit of only ₹ 40,00,000/-, whereas in a similar case, the Commissioner (Appeals) in relation to duty demand of ₹ 48,03,301/-, had thought it fit to direct pre-deposit of ₹ 34,00,000/-. According to the learned counsel, the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified in directing payment of such a huge amount of predeposit, when on a similar issue, the Tribunal had thought it fit to direct payment of a much les .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g with interest and penalties. It was submitted that having regard to the order passed by the Tribunal on merits, on a similar issue, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners on account of non-payment of pre-deposit is required to be quashed and set aside. It was submitted that at the time of issuance of notice, this court had directed the petitioners to deposit ₹ 10,00,000/- with the original authority which can be treated as pre-deposit and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich is not merited by the conduct of the claimant, or is very much disproportionate to it. Undue hardship is caused when the hardship is not warranted by the circumstances. It was submitted that the undue hardship is caused by the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) directing payment of pre-deposit which is very much disproportionate to the amount of pre-deposit ordered to be paid by the Tribunal in a similar set of facts. 7. Opposing the petition, Mrs. V. D. Nanavati, learned standing c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Central Government in revision which is not permissible. It was submitted that the Commissioner (Appeals) was in law justified in not entertaining the appeal as the petitioners did not comply with the provisions of pre-deposit under section 129E of the Customs Act. It was accordingly urged that this court may not entertain the petition and that the petitions be dismissed and the petitioners be relegated to avail of the alternative statutory remedy available under the provisions of the Customs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-, whereas, the Commissioner (Appeals) has thought it fit to direct the petitioners to pre-deposit an amount of ₹ 34,00,000/- as against a duty demand of ₹ 48,03,301/-. Thus, there is a considerable disparity in the amount of predeposit as directed by the Appellate Tribunal and as directed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 10. The Supreme Court in Benara Valves Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise (supra) had, in the context of the expression of hardship as envisaged under section 35F .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

matter within the special knowledge of the applicant for waiver and has to be established by him. A mere assertion about undue hardship would not be sufficient. It was noted by this Court in S. Vasudeva v. State of Karnataka and Ors. (AIR 1994 SC 923) that under Indian conditions expression "Undue hardship" is normally related to economic hardship. "Undue" which means something which is not merited by the conduct of the claimant, or is very much disproportionate to it. Undue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1. Examining the facts of the present case in the light of the principles propounded in the above decision, as noticed hereinabove, in relation to an identical issue, the Appellate Tribunal had thought it fit to direct pre-deposit of ₹ 48,03,301/- as against the demand of excess drawback of ₹ 2,71,78,810/-, whereas the Commissioner (Appeals) has thought it fit to direct the petitioners to pre-deposit ₹ 24,00,000/- and ₹ 10,00,000/- in relation to demand of excess drawback .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the classification issue which is involved in the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) stands concluded by an order dated 29.10.2015 of the Appellate Tribunal in favour of the petitioners. Under the circumstances, the petitioners have a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit. 12. By an order dated 16.07.2015, this court had directed the petitioners to deposit ₹ 10,00,000/- with the original authority, that is, the respondent No.4 herein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Forum: REGISTRETION

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version