New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 28 - ITAT MUMBAI

2015 (12) TMI 28 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - TDS u/s 194I - non deduction of TDS - assessee in default - agreement of lease and the nature of payment of rent - CIT(A) deleted the disallowance - Held that:- The Tribunal has been taking a consistent view after taking into consideration the agreement of lease and the nature of payment and also the scope and ambit of definition of "rent" as given in section 194I, that no TDS is required to be deducted on such a premium paid for acquisition of rights in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eal has been filed by the revenue against impugned order dated 11.02.2014, passed by CIT(A)-14, Mumbai in relation to the order passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) for the assessment year 2011-12, vide which following grounds have been raised :- "(i) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that the amount paid by the Lessee (Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt Ltd) to the Lessor (MMRD) was not in the nature of rent, as defined in the Explanation (i) to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ating the assessee as an assessee in default u/s 201(1) in respect of the amount of tax which has not been deducted under section 194I form the payment made to MMRDA and levying interest under section 201(1A). (iv) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in ignoring the definition of rent, as contained in section 194I and in restoring to interpretative reasoning whereas as per the settled principle of jurisprudence, this exercise is required only wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

parties agreed that the issue involved in the aforesaid appeal is covered by series of Tribunal decisions in various cases, wherein it has been consistently held that payment of lease premium paid to MMRDA towards acquiring rights and use of land is not covered under definition of rent, within the section 194I and, therefore, assessee is not required to deduct TDS on such payment and, therefore, assessee cannot be treated as assessee in default u/s 201 and consequently no liability for interest .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se premium and ₹ 380 crores respectively. The AO held that, the said payments were in the nature of lease rent on which assessee has not deducted tax at source hence there was contravention of provisions of section 194I. 4. Before the AO, the assessee has made a very detailed submission that amount of one time lease payment was in the nature of premium for acquiring the rights in respect of the plots and it was not in the nature of rent as contemplated u/s 194I. The assessee s submissions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on which has been incorporated by CIT(A) in para 4.2. The Ld. CIT(A) held that, the premium is not paid under any lease but was made upon granting of rights and allotment of plot as it was considered a payment for acquisition of land rights and not merely a payment of rent for the use of the land. The amount charged was as per the stamp duty ready recokner, therefore, such a premium paid is capital in nature and not a rent as contemplated u/s 194I. After following the decision of ITAT Mumbai Ben .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version