Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 65 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (12) TMI 65 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Request for re-import of machines duty free under Notification No. 158/95 dated 14.11.1995 - Held that:- Order of the Dy. Commissioner is very cryptic. It appears that he gave a personal hearing to the appellant but does not record the details of the personal hearing. He brushed aside the details of personal hearing by making a short statement in his order to the effect that ‘party appeared for personal hearing’. He has not given details of the evidence p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been found on plates on the burnt machines as indicated in the examination report above. It is also not on record whether the Dy. Commissioner made an attempt to verify from the Central Excise Authorities in whose jurisdiction the machines were got repaired by the manufacturer - Revenue has not made any contention that other identical machines were exported to the same buyer and therefore there could be some confusion whether same machines were re-imported. - Impugned order is set aside - Decide .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exported machines i.e. machine for block cutting of foamed (plastic) material and a second machine for vertical cutting of foamed (plastic) vide shipping bill No. 1223843 dated 03.11.1999 and S.B. No. 1235031 dated 03.12.1999 respectively. In 2001, the machines were re-imported for the purpose of repairs and re-conditioning. The appellant submitted a letter dated 02.09.2000 from the buyer abroad stating that the machines supplied vide invoice bearing nos./date 87/13.11.1999 (machine No.1) and 94 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

djudicating authority. During the hearing before the Tribunal on 25.09.2014, the appellant was asked to file an affidavit showing the details of the machinery exported in 1999 and the details of the machines re-imported vide Bill of Entry No. 504644 dated 02.05.2001. Accordingly, the appellants submitted an affidavit and appeared before us on 03.03.2015. 3. Heard both sides and considered the submissions. 4. We find that the order of the Dy. Commissioner is very cryptic. It appears that he gave .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vailable with the appellant to support their case. Being a very old case, we proceed to decide the matter on the basis of evidence on record. 5. It is not understood how the authorities below came to the conclusion which they arrived at on the basis of examination of the machines. The examination report of the damaged machines at the time of re-import is extracted below:- Lot inspected opened & examined all. Checked description, quantity and found that goods are observed in burnt condition a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Is a control panel which is found in burnt condition with no any markings, etc. which is not reflecting in any of the S/Bill. Both observed plates forwarded to Gr. for inspection. Identity of the goods & time-limit for re-importation may Pl. BE VFD. in Gr. Goods examined under DC/Dock supervision. Duty free of re-import of machines under Notification No. 158/95 is contingent upon the satisfaction of the Dy. Commissioner as to the identity of the goods. However, the order of the Dy. Commissi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t port the goods reached at our factory premises on 21.06.2001 and interred in the warehouse register vide entry number 01 dated 21.06.2001. As per the provision of rule 173MM pre-intimation of arrival of goods were submitted to Jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner with copy to Jurisdictional Superintendent on 18.06.2001 and necessary intimation of receipt of the goods to the Inspector of Central Excise with copy to the Superintendent were submitted on 21.06.2001. The physical examination were don .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version